Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in the adolescent cleft patient: Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of linear and volumetric changes over five years

Philip Kuo Ting Chen, Yong Chen Por, Eric Jein Wein Liou, Frank Chun Shin Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the results of maxillary distraction osteogenesis with the Rigid External Distraction System using three-dimensional computed tomography scan volume-rendered images with respect to stability and facial growth at three time frames: preoperative (T0), 1-year postoperative (T1), and 5-years postoperative (T2). Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: Tertiary. Patients: A total of 12 patients with severe cleft maxillary hypoplasia were treated between June 30, 1997, and July 15, 1998. The mean age at surgery was 11 years 1 month. Interventions: Le Fort I maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Distraction was started 2 to 5 days postsurgery at a rate of 1 mm per day. The consolidation period was 3 months. No face mask was used. A paired t test was used for statistical analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Overjet, ANB, and SNA and maxillary, pterygoid, and mandibular volumes. Results: From T0 to T1, there were statistically significant increments of overjet, ANB, and SNA and maxillary, pterygoid, and mandibular volumes. The T1 to T2 period demonstrated a reduction of overjet (30.07%) and ANB (54.42%). The maxilla showed a stable SNA and a small but statistically significant advancement of the ANS point. There was a significant increase in the mandibular volume. However, there was no significant change in the maxillary and pterygoid volumes. Conclusions: Maxillary distraction osteogenesis demonstrated linear and volumetric maxillary growth during the distraction phase without clinically significant continued growth thereafter. Overcorrection is required to take into account recurrence of midface retrusion over the long term.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-454
Number of pages10
JournalCleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Distraction Osteogenesis
Tomography
Growth
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Maxilla
Masks
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Recurrence

Keywords

  • 3D CT analysis
  • Cleft maxillary distraction
  • Relapse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in the adolescent cleft patient : Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of linear and volumetric changes over five years. / Chen, Philip Kuo Ting; Por, Yong Chen; Liou, Eric Jein Wein; Chang, Frank Chun Shin.

In: Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, Vol. 48, No. 4, 01.07.2011, p. 445-454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2af357d956264fdabcb3d3b182623330,
title = "Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in the adolescent cleft patient: Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of linear and volumetric changes over five years",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the results of maxillary distraction osteogenesis with the Rigid External Distraction System using three-dimensional computed tomography scan volume-rendered images with respect to stability and facial growth at three time frames: preoperative (T0), 1-year postoperative (T1), and 5-years postoperative (T2). Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: Tertiary. Patients: A total of 12 patients with severe cleft maxillary hypoplasia were treated between June 30, 1997, and July 15, 1998. The mean age at surgery was 11 years 1 month. Interventions: Le Fort I maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Distraction was started 2 to 5 days postsurgery at a rate of 1 mm per day. The consolidation period was 3 months. No face mask was used. A paired t test was used for statistical analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Overjet, ANB, and SNA and maxillary, pterygoid, and mandibular volumes. Results: From T0 to T1, there were statistically significant increments of overjet, ANB, and SNA and maxillary, pterygoid, and mandibular volumes. The T1 to T2 period demonstrated a reduction of overjet (30.07{\%}) and ANB (54.42{\%}). The maxilla showed a stable SNA and a small but statistically significant advancement of the ANS point. There was a significant increase in the mandibular volume. However, there was no significant change in the maxillary and pterygoid volumes. Conclusions: Maxillary distraction osteogenesis demonstrated linear and volumetric maxillary growth during the distraction phase without clinically significant continued growth thereafter. Overcorrection is required to take into account recurrence of midface retrusion over the long term.",
keywords = "3D CT analysis, Cleft maxillary distraction, Relapse",
author = "Chen, {Philip Kuo Ting} and Por, {Yong Chen} and Liou, {Eric Jein Wein} and Chang, {Frank Chun Shin}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1597/09-087",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "445--454",
journal = "Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal",
issn = "1055-6656",
publisher = "American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in the adolescent cleft patient

T2 - Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of linear and volumetric changes over five years

AU - Chen, Philip Kuo Ting

AU - Por, Yong Chen

AU - Liou, Eric Jein Wein

AU - Chang, Frank Chun Shin

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - Objective: To assess the results of maxillary distraction osteogenesis with the Rigid External Distraction System using three-dimensional computed tomography scan volume-rendered images with respect to stability and facial growth at three time frames: preoperative (T0), 1-year postoperative (T1), and 5-years postoperative (T2). Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: Tertiary. Patients: A total of 12 patients with severe cleft maxillary hypoplasia were treated between June 30, 1997, and July 15, 1998. The mean age at surgery was 11 years 1 month. Interventions: Le Fort I maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Distraction was started 2 to 5 days postsurgery at a rate of 1 mm per day. The consolidation period was 3 months. No face mask was used. A paired t test was used for statistical analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Overjet, ANB, and SNA and maxillary, pterygoid, and mandibular volumes. Results: From T0 to T1, there were statistically significant increments of overjet, ANB, and SNA and maxillary, pterygoid, and mandibular volumes. The T1 to T2 period demonstrated a reduction of overjet (30.07%) and ANB (54.42%). The maxilla showed a stable SNA and a small but statistically significant advancement of the ANS point. There was a significant increase in the mandibular volume. However, there was no significant change in the maxillary and pterygoid volumes. Conclusions: Maxillary distraction osteogenesis demonstrated linear and volumetric maxillary growth during the distraction phase without clinically significant continued growth thereafter. Overcorrection is required to take into account recurrence of midface retrusion over the long term.

AB - Objective: To assess the results of maxillary distraction osteogenesis with the Rigid External Distraction System using three-dimensional computed tomography scan volume-rendered images with respect to stability and facial growth at three time frames: preoperative (T0), 1-year postoperative (T1), and 5-years postoperative (T2). Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: Tertiary. Patients: A total of 12 patients with severe cleft maxillary hypoplasia were treated between June 30, 1997, and July 15, 1998. The mean age at surgery was 11 years 1 month. Interventions: Le Fort I maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Distraction was started 2 to 5 days postsurgery at a rate of 1 mm per day. The consolidation period was 3 months. No face mask was used. A paired t test was used for statistical analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Overjet, ANB, and SNA and maxillary, pterygoid, and mandibular volumes. Results: From T0 to T1, there were statistically significant increments of overjet, ANB, and SNA and maxillary, pterygoid, and mandibular volumes. The T1 to T2 period demonstrated a reduction of overjet (30.07%) and ANB (54.42%). The maxilla showed a stable SNA and a small but statistically significant advancement of the ANS point. There was a significant increase in the mandibular volume. However, there was no significant change in the maxillary and pterygoid volumes. Conclusions: Maxillary distraction osteogenesis demonstrated linear and volumetric maxillary growth during the distraction phase without clinically significant continued growth thereafter. Overcorrection is required to take into account recurrence of midface retrusion over the long term.

KW - 3D CT analysis

KW - Cleft maxillary distraction

KW - Relapse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960467203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960467203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1597/09-087

DO - 10.1597/09-087

M3 - Article

C2 - 20536369

AN - SCOPUS:79960467203

VL - 48

SP - 445

EP - 454

JO - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

JF - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

SN - 1055-6656

IS - 4

ER -