Management of complicated lumbar artery injury after blunt trauma

Kuo Ching Yuan, Yu Pao Hsu, Yon Cheong Wong, Jen Feng Fang, Being Chung Lin, Huan Wu Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objective: Lumbar artery injury after blunt trauma is not frequently discussed. We review our experience with blunt lumbar artery injury management, especially alternative treatments in which embolization is not feasible. Methods: We reviewed our trauma registry for 8 years 8 months. We sought all patients who sustained blunt torso trauma and had lumbar artery injury detected by angiography. Variables collected included demographic data, trauma mechanism, vital signs in triage, Injury Severity Score, associated injuries, computed tomography results, angiography results, embolizations, and outcome. Results: Sixteen of the 3,436 patients in the trauma registry system had a blunt lumbar artery injury verified by angiography. For patients with lumbar artery injury, the mean Injury Severity Score was 38.6 (SD 12), and 10 (63%) of these 16 patients were in shock and 12 patients (75%) had closed head injuries. Angioembolization caused bleeding cessation in 11 patients but failed in 5 patients, who were treated conservatively. The overall mortality rate of patients with lumbar artery injury was 50%. Conclusion: Lumbar artery injury in multiply injured patients with blunt trauma leads to a high mortality rate, especially if accompanied by head injury. Embolization often stops bleeding, but, if embolization is not feasible, conservative treatment without retroperitoneal surgery can be successful.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)531-535
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume58
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nonpenetrating Wounds
Arteries
Wounds and Injuries
Injury Severity Score
Registries
Angiography
Hemorrhage
Closed Head Injuries
Torso
Mortality
Vital Signs
Triage
Craniocerebral Trauma
Shock

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Management of complicated lumbar artery injury after blunt trauma. / Yuan, Kuo Ching; Hsu, Yu Pao; Wong, Yon Cheong; Fang, Jen Feng; Lin, Being Chung; Chen, Huan Wu.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 58, No. 6, 01.12.2011, p. 531-535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yuan, Kuo Ching ; Hsu, Yu Pao ; Wong, Yon Cheong ; Fang, Jen Feng ; Lin, Being Chung ; Chen, Huan Wu. / Management of complicated lumbar artery injury after blunt trauma. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 58, No. 6. pp. 531-535.
@article{59261233d08b41f8b9a36f22c0868783,
title = "Management of complicated lumbar artery injury after blunt trauma",
abstract = "Study objective: Lumbar artery injury after blunt trauma is not frequently discussed. We review our experience with blunt lumbar artery injury management, especially alternative treatments in which embolization is not feasible. Methods: We reviewed our trauma registry for 8 years 8 months. We sought all patients who sustained blunt torso trauma and had lumbar artery injury detected by angiography. Variables collected included demographic data, trauma mechanism, vital signs in triage, Injury Severity Score, associated injuries, computed tomography results, angiography results, embolizations, and outcome. Results: Sixteen of the 3,436 patients in the trauma registry system had a blunt lumbar artery injury verified by angiography. For patients with lumbar artery injury, the mean Injury Severity Score was 38.6 (SD 12), and 10 (63{\%}) of these 16 patients were in shock and 12 patients (75{\%}) had closed head injuries. Angioembolization caused bleeding cessation in 11 patients but failed in 5 patients, who were treated conservatively. The overall mortality rate of patients with lumbar artery injury was 50{\%}. Conclusion: Lumbar artery injury in multiply injured patients with blunt trauma leads to a high mortality rate, especially if accompanied by head injury. Embolization often stops bleeding, but, if embolization is not feasible, conservative treatment without retroperitoneal surgery can be successful.",
author = "Yuan, {Kuo Ching} and Hsu, {Yu Pao} and Wong, {Yon Cheong} and Fang, {Jen Feng} and Lin, {Being Chung} and Chen, {Huan Wu}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.002",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "531--535",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of complicated lumbar artery injury after blunt trauma

AU - Yuan, Kuo Ching

AU - Hsu, Yu Pao

AU - Wong, Yon Cheong

AU - Fang, Jen Feng

AU - Lin, Being Chung

AU - Chen, Huan Wu

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Study objective: Lumbar artery injury after blunt trauma is not frequently discussed. We review our experience with blunt lumbar artery injury management, especially alternative treatments in which embolization is not feasible. Methods: We reviewed our trauma registry for 8 years 8 months. We sought all patients who sustained blunt torso trauma and had lumbar artery injury detected by angiography. Variables collected included demographic data, trauma mechanism, vital signs in triage, Injury Severity Score, associated injuries, computed tomography results, angiography results, embolizations, and outcome. Results: Sixteen of the 3,436 patients in the trauma registry system had a blunt lumbar artery injury verified by angiography. For patients with lumbar artery injury, the mean Injury Severity Score was 38.6 (SD 12), and 10 (63%) of these 16 patients were in shock and 12 patients (75%) had closed head injuries. Angioembolization caused bleeding cessation in 11 patients but failed in 5 patients, who were treated conservatively. The overall mortality rate of patients with lumbar artery injury was 50%. Conclusion: Lumbar artery injury in multiply injured patients with blunt trauma leads to a high mortality rate, especially if accompanied by head injury. Embolization often stops bleeding, but, if embolization is not feasible, conservative treatment without retroperitoneal surgery can be successful.

AB - Study objective: Lumbar artery injury after blunt trauma is not frequently discussed. We review our experience with blunt lumbar artery injury management, especially alternative treatments in which embolization is not feasible. Methods: We reviewed our trauma registry for 8 years 8 months. We sought all patients who sustained blunt torso trauma and had lumbar artery injury detected by angiography. Variables collected included demographic data, trauma mechanism, vital signs in triage, Injury Severity Score, associated injuries, computed tomography results, angiography results, embolizations, and outcome. Results: Sixteen of the 3,436 patients in the trauma registry system had a blunt lumbar artery injury verified by angiography. For patients with lumbar artery injury, the mean Injury Severity Score was 38.6 (SD 12), and 10 (63%) of these 16 patients were in shock and 12 patients (75%) had closed head injuries. Angioembolization caused bleeding cessation in 11 patients but failed in 5 patients, who were treated conservatively. The overall mortality rate of patients with lumbar artery injury was 50%. Conclusion: Lumbar artery injury in multiply injured patients with blunt trauma leads to a high mortality rate, especially if accompanied by head injury. Embolization often stops bleeding, but, if embolization is not feasible, conservative treatment without retroperitoneal surgery can be successful.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81555203422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81555203422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 21802772

AN - SCOPUS:81555203422

VL - 58

SP - 531

EP - 535

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 6

ER -