Magnetoencephalographic yield of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy: Comparison with scalp EEG recordings

Y. Y. Lin, Y. H. Shih, J. C. Hsieh, H. Y. Yu, C. H. Yiu, Tai-Tong Wong, T. C. Yeh, S. Y. Kwan, L. T. Ho, D. J. Yen, Z. A. Wu, M. S. Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To compare magnetoencephalography (MEG) with scalp electroencephalography (EEG) in the detection of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), we simultaneously recorded MEG and scalp EEG with a whole-scalp neuromagnetometer in 46 TLE patients. We visually searched interictal spikes on MEG and EEG channels and classified them into three types according to their presentation on MEG alone (M-spikes), EEG alone (E-spikes), or concomitantly on both modalities (M/E-spikes). The M-spikes and M/E-spikes were localized with MEG equivalent current dipole modeling. We analyzed the relative contribution of MEG and EEG in the overall yield of spike detection and also compared M-spikes with M/E-spikes in terms of dipole locations and strengths. During the 30- to 40-min MEG recordings, interictal spikes were obtained in 36 (78.3%) of the 46 patients. Among the 36 patients, most spikes were M/E-spikes (68.3%), some were M-spikes (22.1%), and some were E-spikes (9.7%). In comparison with EEG, MEG gave better spike yield in patients with lateral TLE. Sources of M/E- and M-spikes were situated in the same anatomical regions, whereas the average dipole strength was larger for M/E- than M-spikes. In conclusion, some interictal spikes appeared selectively on either MEG or EEG channels in TLE patients although more spikes were simultaneously identified on both modalities. Thus, simultaneous MEG and EEG recordings help to enhance spike detection. Identification of M-spikes would offer important localization of irritative foci, especially in patients with lateral TLE.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1115-1126
Number of pages12
JournalNeuroImage
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Magnetoencephalography
Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
Scalp
Electroencephalography

Keywords

  • Interictal spikes
  • Magnetoencephalography
  • Scalp EEG
  • Spike detection
  • Temporal lobe epilepsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Magnetoencephalographic yield of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy : Comparison with scalp EEG recordings. / Lin, Y. Y.; Shih, Y. H.; Hsieh, J. C.; Yu, H. Y.; Yiu, C. H.; Wong, Tai-Tong; Yeh, T. C.; Kwan, S. Y.; Ho, L. T.; Yen, D. J.; Wu, Z. A.; Chang, M. S.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.07.2003, p. 1115-1126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lin, YY, Shih, YH, Hsieh, JC, Yu, HY, Yiu, CH, Wong, T-T, Yeh, TC, Kwan, SY, Ho, LT, Yen, DJ, Wu, ZA & Chang, MS 2003, 'Magnetoencephalographic yield of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy: Comparison with scalp EEG recordings', NeuroImage, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1115-1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00181-2
Lin, Y. Y. ; Shih, Y. H. ; Hsieh, J. C. ; Yu, H. Y. ; Yiu, C. H. ; Wong, Tai-Tong ; Yeh, T. C. ; Kwan, S. Y. ; Ho, L. T. ; Yen, D. J. ; Wu, Z. A. ; Chang, M. S. / Magnetoencephalographic yield of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy : Comparison with scalp EEG recordings. In: NeuroImage. 2003 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 1115-1126.
@article{096275795e654dd6810b18c55330a905,
title = "Magnetoencephalographic yield of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy: Comparison with scalp EEG recordings",
abstract = "To compare magnetoencephalography (MEG) with scalp electroencephalography (EEG) in the detection of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), we simultaneously recorded MEG and scalp EEG with a whole-scalp neuromagnetometer in 46 TLE patients. We visually searched interictal spikes on MEG and EEG channels and classified them into three types according to their presentation on MEG alone (M-spikes), EEG alone (E-spikes), or concomitantly on both modalities (M/E-spikes). The M-spikes and M/E-spikes were localized with MEG equivalent current dipole modeling. We analyzed the relative contribution of MEG and EEG in the overall yield of spike detection and also compared M-spikes with M/E-spikes in terms of dipole locations and strengths. During the 30- to 40-min MEG recordings, interictal spikes were obtained in 36 (78.3{\%}) of the 46 patients. Among the 36 patients, most spikes were M/E-spikes (68.3{\%}), some were M-spikes (22.1{\%}), and some were E-spikes (9.7{\%}). In comparison with EEG, MEG gave better spike yield in patients with lateral TLE. Sources of M/E- and M-spikes were situated in the same anatomical regions, whereas the average dipole strength was larger for M/E- than M-spikes. In conclusion, some interictal spikes appeared selectively on either MEG or EEG channels in TLE patients although more spikes were simultaneously identified on both modalities. Thus, simultaneous MEG and EEG recordings help to enhance spike detection. Identification of M-spikes would offer important localization of irritative foci, especially in patients with lateral TLE.",
keywords = "Interictal spikes, Magnetoencephalography, Scalp EEG, Spike detection, Temporal lobe epilepsy",
author = "Lin, {Y. Y.} and Shih, {Y. H.} and Hsieh, {J. C.} and Yu, {H. Y.} and Yiu, {C. H.} and Tai-Tong Wong and Yeh, {T. C.} and Kwan, {S. Y.} and Ho, {L. T.} and Yen, {D. J.} and Wu, {Z. A.} and Chang, {M. S.}",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00181-2",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1115--1126",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnetoencephalographic yield of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy

T2 - Comparison with scalp EEG recordings

AU - Lin, Y. Y.

AU - Shih, Y. H.

AU - Hsieh, J. C.

AU - Yu, H. Y.

AU - Yiu, C. H.

AU - Wong, Tai-Tong

AU - Yeh, T. C.

AU - Kwan, S. Y.

AU - Ho, L. T.

AU - Yen, D. J.

AU - Wu, Z. A.

AU - Chang, M. S.

PY - 2003/7/1

Y1 - 2003/7/1

N2 - To compare magnetoencephalography (MEG) with scalp electroencephalography (EEG) in the detection of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), we simultaneously recorded MEG and scalp EEG with a whole-scalp neuromagnetometer in 46 TLE patients. We visually searched interictal spikes on MEG and EEG channels and classified them into three types according to their presentation on MEG alone (M-spikes), EEG alone (E-spikes), or concomitantly on both modalities (M/E-spikes). The M-spikes and M/E-spikes were localized with MEG equivalent current dipole modeling. We analyzed the relative contribution of MEG and EEG in the overall yield of spike detection and also compared M-spikes with M/E-spikes in terms of dipole locations and strengths. During the 30- to 40-min MEG recordings, interictal spikes were obtained in 36 (78.3%) of the 46 patients. Among the 36 patients, most spikes were M/E-spikes (68.3%), some were M-spikes (22.1%), and some were E-spikes (9.7%). In comparison with EEG, MEG gave better spike yield in patients with lateral TLE. Sources of M/E- and M-spikes were situated in the same anatomical regions, whereas the average dipole strength was larger for M/E- than M-spikes. In conclusion, some interictal spikes appeared selectively on either MEG or EEG channels in TLE patients although more spikes were simultaneously identified on both modalities. Thus, simultaneous MEG and EEG recordings help to enhance spike detection. Identification of M-spikes would offer important localization of irritative foci, especially in patients with lateral TLE.

AB - To compare magnetoencephalography (MEG) with scalp electroencephalography (EEG) in the detection of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), we simultaneously recorded MEG and scalp EEG with a whole-scalp neuromagnetometer in 46 TLE patients. We visually searched interictal spikes on MEG and EEG channels and classified them into three types according to their presentation on MEG alone (M-spikes), EEG alone (E-spikes), or concomitantly on both modalities (M/E-spikes). The M-spikes and M/E-spikes were localized with MEG equivalent current dipole modeling. We analyzed the relative contribution of MEG and EEG in the overall yield of spike detection and also compared M-spikes with M/E-spikes in terms of dipole locations and strengths. During the 30- to 40-min MEG recordings, interictal spikes were obtained in 36 (78.3%) of the 46 patients. Among the 36 patients, most spikes were M/E-spikes (68.3%), some were M-spikes (22.1%), and some were E-spikes (9.7%). In comparison with EEG, MEG gave better spike yield in patients with lateral TLE. Sources of M/E- and M-spikes were situated in the same anatomical regions, whereas the average dipole strength was larger for M/E- than M-spikes. In conclusion, some interictal spikes appeared selectively on either MEG or EEG channels in TLE patients although more spikes were simultaneously identified on both modalities. Thus, simultaneous MEG and EEG recordings help to enhance spike detection. Identification of M-spikes would offer important localization of irritative foci, especially in patients with lateral TLE.

KW - Interictal spikes

KW - Magnetoencephalography

KW - Scalp EEG

KW - Spike detection

KW - Temporal lobe epilepsy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0043172267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0043172267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00181-2

DO - 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00181-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 12880837

AN - SCOPUS:0043172267

VL - 19

SP - 1115

EP - 1126

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 3

ER -