Low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in dyslipidemic women: The Lipid Treatment Assessment Project (L-TAP) 2

Raul D. Santos, David D. Waters, Lisa Tarasenko, Michael Messig, J. Wouter Jukema, Jean Ferrières, Juan Verdejo, Cheng Wen Chiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Differences between women and men have been documented for both diagnostic testing and treatment in cardiology. This analysis evaluates whether low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) success rates according to current guidelines and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels differ by gender in the L-TAP 2 population. Methods: Patients aged ≥20 years with dyslipidemia on stable lipid-lowering therapy were assessed in 9 countries between September 2006 and April 2007. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment by cardiovascular risk level and region and determinants of low HDL-C were compared between genders. Results: Of 9,955 patients (45.3% women) evaluated, women had a significantly lower overall LDL-C success rate than men (71.5% vs 73.7%, P = .014), due entirely to the difference in the high-risk/coronary heart disease (CHD) group (LDL-C goal

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)860-866
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume158
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in dyslipidemic women: The Lipid Treatment Assessment Project (L-TAP) 2'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Santos, R. D., Waters, D. D., Tarasenko, L., Messig, M., Jukema, J. W., Ferrières, J., Verdejo, J., & Chiang, C. W. (2009). Low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in dyslipidemic women: The Lipid Treatment Assessment Project (L-TAP) 2. American Heart Journal, 158(5), 860-866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.009