Long-term comparison of four techniques for obtaining nasal symmetry in unilateral complete cleft lip patients: A single surgeon's experience

Chun Shin Chang, Yong Chen Por, Eric Jein Wein Liou, Chee Jen Chang, Philip Kuo Ting Chen, M. Samuel Noordhoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study was the result of a constant evaluation of surgical techniques and results to obtain excellence in primary cleft rhinoplasty. Methods: This was a retrospective study from 1992 to 2003 comparing the long-term outcomes of four techniques of nasal reconstruction. There were 76 patients divided into four groups: group I (n = 23 patients), primary rhinoplasty alone; group II (n = 16 patients), nasoalveolar molding alone; group III (n = 14 patients), nasoalveolar molding plus primary rhinoplasty; and group IV (n = 23 patients), nasoalveolar molding plus primary rhinoplasty plus overcorrection. The surgical results were analyzed using photographic records obtained at 5 years of age. A ratio of six measurements was obtained comparing the cleft and noncleft sides. A panel assessment was obtained to grade the appearance of the surgical results. All surgery was performed by the senior author (P.K.T.C.). Results: The results are given for groups I to IV, respectively. The nostril height ratio was 0.73, 0.77, 0.81, and 0.95. The nostril width ratio was 1.23, 1.36, 1.23, and 1.21. The one-fourth medial part of nostril height ratio was 0.70, 0.87, 0.92, and 1.00. The nasal sill height ratio was 0.75, 1.02, 1.07, and 1.07. The nostril area ratio was 0.86, 0.89, 0.95, and 1.08. The nostril height-to-width ratio was 0.58, 0.58, 0.71, and 0.92. Finally, group IV had the best panel assessment. Conclusions: The results revealed that group IV had the best overall result. Overcorrection of 20 percent was necessary to maintain the nostril height. Further technical modifications are necessary to minimize widening of the nostril width.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1276-1284
Number of pages9
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume126
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cleft Lip
Rhinoplasty
Nose
Retrospective Studies
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Long-term comparison of four techniques for obtaining nasal symmetry in unilateral complete cleft lip patients : A single surgeon's experience. / Chang, Chun Shin; Por, Yong Chen; Liou, Eric Jein Wein; Chang, Chee Jen; Chen, Philip Kuo Ting; Noordhoff, M. Samuel.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 126, No. 4, 01.10.2010, p. 1276-1284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chang, Chun Shin ; Por, Yong Chen ; Liou, Eric Jein Wein ; Chang, Chee Jen ; Chen, Philip Kuo Ting ; Noordhoff, M. Samuel. / Long-term comparison of four techniques for obtaining nasal symmetry in unilateral complete cleft lip patients : A single surgeon's experience. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2010 ; Vol. 126, No. 4. pp. 1276-1284.
@article{5ac9ae3a78e14cdba52e811ec1404641,
title = "Long-term comparison of four techniques for obtaining nasal symmetry in unilateral complete cleft lip patients: A single surgeon's experience",
abstract = "Background: This study was the result of a constant evaluation of surgical techniques and results to obtain excellence in primary cleft rhinoplasty. Methods: This was a retrospective study from 1992 to 2003 comparing the long-term outcomes of four techniques of nasal reconstruction. There were 76 patients divided into four groups: group I (n = 23 patients), primary rhinoplasty alone; group II (n = 16 patients), nasoalveolar molding alone; group III (n = 14 patients), nasoalveolar molding plus primary rhinoplasty; and group IV (n = 23 patients), nasoalveolar molding plus primary rhinoplasty plus overcorrection. The surgical results were analyzed using photographic records obtained at 5 years of age. A ratio of six measurements was obtained comparing the cleft and noncleft sides. A panel assessment was obtained to grade the appearance of the surgical results. All surgery was performed by the senior author (P.K.T.C.). Results: The results are given for groups I to IV, respectively. The nostril height ratio was 0.73, 0.77, 0.81, and 0.95. The nostril width ratio was 1.23, 1.36, 1.23, and 1.21. The one-fourth medial part of nostril height ratio was 0.70, 0.87, 0.92, and 1.00. The nasal sill height ratio was 0.75, 1.02, 1.07, and 1.07. The nostril area ratio was 0.86, 0.89, 0.95, and 1.08. The nostril height-to-width ratio was 0.58, 0.58, 0.71, and 0.92. Finally, group IV had the best panel assessment. Conclusions: The results revealed that group IV had the best overall result. Overcorrection of 20 percent was necessary to maintain the nostril height. Further technical modifications are necessary to minimize widening of the nostril width.",
author = "Chang, {Chun Shin} and Por, {Yong Chen} and Liou, {Eric Jein Wein} and Chang, {Chee Jen} and Chen, {Philip Kuo Ting} and Noordhoff, {M. Samuel}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ec21e4",
language = "English",
volume = "126",
pages = "1276--1284",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term comparison of four techniques for obtaining nasal symmetry in unilateral complete cleft lip patients

T2 - A single surgeon's experience

AU - Chang, Chun Shin

AU - Por, Yong Chen

AU - Liou, Eric Jein Wein

AU - Chang, Chee Jen

AU - Chen, Philip Kuo Ting

AU - Noordhoff, M. Samuel

PY - 2010/10/1

Y1 - 2010/10/1

N2 - Background: This study was the result of a constant evaluation of surgical techniques and results to obtain excellence in primary cleft rhinoplasty. Methods: This was a retrospective study from 1992 to 2003 comparing the long-term outcomes of four techniques of nasal reconstruction. There were 76 patients divided into four groups: group I (n = 23 patients), primary rhinoplasty alone; group II (n = 16 patients), nasoalveolar molding alone; group III (n = 14 patients), nasoalveolar molding plus primary rhinoplasty; and group IV (n = 23 patients), nasoalveolar molding plus primary rhinoplasty plus overcorrection. The surgical results were analyzed using photographic records obtained at 5 years of age. A ratio of six measurements was obtained comparing the cleft and noncleft sides. A panel assessment was obtained to grade the appearance of the surgical results. All surgery was performed by the senior author (P.K.T.C.). Results: The results are given for groups I to IV, respectively. The nostril height ratio was 0.73, 0.77, 0.81, and 0.95. The nostril width ratio was 1.23, 1.36, 1.23, and 1.21. The one-fourth medial part of nostril height ratio was 0.70, 0.87, 0.92, and 1.00. The nasal sill height ratio was 0.75, 1.02, 1.07, and 1.07. The nostril area ratio was 0.86, 0.89, 0.95, and 1.08. The nostril height-to-width ratio was 0.58, 0.58, 0.71, and 0.92. Finally, group IV had the best panel assessment. Conclusions: The results revealed that group IV had the best overall result. Overcorrection of 20 percent was necessary to maintain the nostril height. Further technical modifications are necessary to minimize widening of the nostril width.

AB - Background: This study was the result of a constant evaluation of surgical techniques and results to obtain excellence in primary cleft rhinoplasty. Methods: This was a retrospective study from 1992 to 2003 comparing the long-term outcomes of four techniques of nasal reconstruction. There were 76 patients divided into four groups: group I (n = 23 patients), primary rhinoplasty alone; group II (n = 16 patients), nasoalveolar molding alone; group III (n = 14 patients), nasoalveolar molding plus primary rhinoplasty; and group IV (n = 23 patients), nasoalveolar molding plus primary rhinoplasty plus overcorrection. The surgical results were analyzed using photographic records obtained at 5 years of age. A ratio of six measurements was obtained comparing the cleft and noncleft sides. A panel assessment was obtained to grade the appearance of the surgical results. All surgery was performed by the senior author (P.K.T.C.). Results: The results are given for groups I to IV, respectively. The nostril height ratio was 0.73, 0.77, 0.81, and 0.95. The nostril width ratio was 1.23, 1.36, 1.23, and 1.21. The one-fourth medial part of nostril height ratio was 0.70, 0.87, 0.92, and 1.00. The nasal sill height ratio was 0.75, 1.02, 1.07, and 1.07. The nostril area ratio was 0.86, 0.89, 0.95, and 1.08. The nostril height-to-width ratio was 0.58, 0.58, 0.71, and 0.92. Finally, group IV had the best panel assessment. Conclusions: The results revealed that group IV had the best overall result. Overcorrection of 20 percent was necessary to maintain the nostril height. Further technical modifications are necessary to minimize widening of the nostril width.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958576285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958576285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ec21e4

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ec21e4

M3 - Article

C2 - 20885247

AN - SCOPUS:77958576285

VL - 126

SP - 1276

EP - 1284

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 4

ER -