Lesser-sac lavage for intraoperative detection of blunt pancreatic duct injury

Yu Pao Hsu, Ray Jade Chen, Jen Feng Fang, Being Chuan Lin, Jung Liang Kao, Yi Chin Kao, Po Chin Yu, Yu Chun Wang, Ping Kuei Chung, Yon Cheong Wong, Li Jen Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: Blunt pancreatic duct injury is difficult to differentiate, especially during surgery. In terms of demonstration of pancreatic duct injury, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) is the gold standard imaging study, however, availability can be problematic. Therefore, we have designed a method utilizing lesser-sac lavage to differentiate pancreatic duct injury. Methodology: Patients sustaining blunt pancreatic trauma treated at our institution over a two-year period were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Based on computed tomography (CT), these patients were divided into two groups: deep laceration or complete transection (Group 1) and superficial laceration (Group 2). Additionally, ten patients sustaining blunt abdominal trauma who had undergone emergency laparotomy for other visceral organ injury (Group 3) and four undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (Group 4) were selected as controls. For laparotomy in Groups 1-3, the lesser sac was opened for lavage, with 50mL of 0.9% normal saline inserted, and 3mL of the sample fluid withdrawn at four time points (15, 30, 45 and 60 mins) with the fluid immediately replaced with 3mL of saline. Lavage-ascites amylase (LAA) and lipase (LAL) levels were measured. Serum amylase and lipase activities were measured intraoperatively from 3mL of the patient's blood. Results: Over the two-year study period, there were four pancreatic duct transections (Group 1), five partial pancreatic lacerations confirmed by post-ERP CT (Group 2), ten non-pancreatic traumas (Group 3), and four pancreatoduodenectomies due to pancreatic-head cancer (Group 4). The LAA and LAL for Group 1 were significantly higher than those for Group 2 or 3 at each of the four time points. The LAA and LAL ratios for Group 1 relative to Group 2 or 3 decreased gradually over time. These LAA ratios ranged from 7-13 for Group 1 to Group 2, 138-232 for Group 1 to Group 3, and 17-21 for Group 2 to Group 3. By contrast, the LAL ratio ranged from 3.0-3.4 comparing Group 1 to Group 2, 3180-29124 for Group 1 to Group 3, and 1058-8705 for Group 2 to Group 3. Conclusions: Using lesser-sac lavage for measurement of LAA and LAL constitutes a rapid, non-invasive and effective method for detection of pancreatic duct injury, especially transection of the main duct. LAA appears to be a better indicator for differentiation of minor (superficial laceration or side branch) or major (MPD) pancreatic injury at the first time point (15 minutes post lavage) compared to LAL. By contrast, LAL appears to be a better indicator with respect to differentiation of the injured pancreas from the normal organ at this time point.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)570-577
Number of pages8
JournalHepato-Gastroenterology
Volume54
Issue number74
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pancreatic Ducts
Therapeutic Irrigation
Peritoneal Cavity
Lipase
Amylases
Ascites
Wounds and Injuries
Lacerations
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Laparotomy
Tomography
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Pancreas
Emergencies

Keywords

  • Amylase
  • Blunt pancreatic duct injury
  • Lesser-sac lavage
  • Lipase

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Hsu, Y. P., Chen, R. J., Fang, J. F., Lin, B. C., Kao, J. L., Kao, Y. C., ... Wang, L. J. (2007). Lesser-sac lavage for intraoperative detection of blunt pancreatic duct injury. Hepato-Gastroenterology, 54(74), 570-577.

Lesser-sac lavage for intraoperative detection of blunt pancreatic duct injury. / Hsu, Yu Pao; Chen, Ray Jade; Fang, Jen Feng; Lin, Being Chuan; Kao, Jung Liang; Kao, Yi Chin; Yu, Po Chin; Wang, Yu Chun; Chung, Ping Kuei; Wong, Yon Cheong; Wang, Li Jen.

In: Hepato-Gastroenterology, Vol. 54, No. 74, 03.2007, p. 570-577.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hsu, YP, Chen, RJ, Fang, JF, Lin, BC, Kao, JL, Kao, YC, Yu, PC, Wang, YC, Chung, PK, Wong, YC & Wang, LJ 2007, 'Lesser-sac lavage for intraoperative detection of blunt pancreatic duct injury', Hepato-Gastroenterology, vol. 54, no. 74, pp. 570-577.
Hsu YP, Chen RJ, Fang JF, Lin BC, Kao JL, Kao YC et al. Lesser-sac lavage for intraoperative detection of blunt pancreatic duct injury. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2007 Mar;54(74):570-577.
Hsu, Yu Pao ; Chen, Ray Jade ; Fang, Jen Feng ; Lin, Being Chuan ; Kao, Jung Liang ; Kao, Yi Chin ; Yu, Po Chin ; Wang, Yu Chun ; Chung, Ping Kuei ; Wong, Yon Cheong ; Wang, Li Jen. / Lesser-sac lavage for intraoperative detection of blunt pancreatic duct injury. In: Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2007 ; Vol. 54, No. 74. pp. 570-577.
@article{bcd41e9aa6ed4e109f0a7014abf52bdd,
title = "Lesser-sac lavage for intraoperative detection of blunt pancreatic duct injury",
abstract = "Background/Aims: Blunt pancreatic duct injury is difficult to differentiate, especially during surgery. In terms of demonstration of pancreatic duct injury, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) is the gold standard imaging study, however, availability can be problematic. Therefore, we have designed a method utilizing lesser-sac lavage to differentiate pancreatic duct injury. Methodology: Patients sustaining blunt pancreatic trauma treated at our institution over a two-year period were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Based on computed tomography (CT), these patients were divided into two groups: deep laceration or complete transection (Group 1) and superficial laceration (Group 2). Additionally, ten patients sustaining blunt abdominal trauma who had undergone emergency laparotomy for other visceral organ injury (Group 3) and four undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (Group 4) were selected as controls. For laparotomy in Groups 1-3, the lesser sac was opened for lavage, with 50mL of 0.9{\%} normal saline inserted, and 3mL of the sample fluid withdrawn at four time points (15, 30, 45 and 60 mins) with the fluid immediately replaced with 3mL of saline. Lavage-ascites amylase (LAA) and lipase (LAL) levels were measured. Serum amylase and lipase activities were measured intraoperatively from 3mL of the patient's blood. Results: Over the two-year study period, there were four pancreatic duct transections (Group 1), five partial pancreatic lacerations confirmed by post-ERP CT (Group 2), ten non-pancreatic traumas (Group 3), and four pancreatoduodenectomies due to pancreatic-head cancer (Group 4). The LAA and LAL for Group 1 were significantly higher than those for Group 2 or 3 at each of the four time points. The LAA and LAL ratios for Group 1 relative to Group 2 or 3 decreased gradually over time. These LAA ratios ranged from 7-13 for Group 1 to Group 2, 138-232 for Group 1 to Group 3, and 17-21 for Group 2 to Group 3. By contrast, the LAL ratio ranged from 3.0-3.4 comparing Group 1 to Group 2, 3180-29124 for Group 1 to Group 3, and 1058-8705 for Group 2 to Group 3. Conclusions: Using lesser-sac lavage for measurement of LAA and LAL constitutes a rapid, non-invasive and effective method for detection of pancreatic duct injury, especially transection of the main duct. LAA appears to be a better indicator for differentiation of minor (superficial laceration or side branch) or major (MPD) pancreatic injury at the first time point (15 minutes post lavage) compared to LAL. By contrast, LAL appears to be a better indicator with respect to differentiation of the injured pancreas from the normal organ at this time point.",
keywords = "Amylase, Blunt pancreatic duct injury, Lesser-sac lavage, Lipase",
author = "Hsu, {Yu Pao} and Chen, {Ray Jade} and Fang, {Jen Feng} and Lin, {Being Chuan} and Kao, {Jung Liang} and Kao, {Yi Chin} and Yu, {Po Chin} and Wang, {Yu Chun} and Chung, {Ping Kuei} and Wong, {Yon Cheong} and Wang, {Li Jen}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "570--577",
journal = "Acta hepato-splenologica",
issn = "0172-6390",
publisher = "H.G.E. Update Medical Publishing Ltd.",
number = "74",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lesser-sac lavage for intraoperative detection of blunt pancreatic duct injury

AU - Hsu, Yu Pao

AU - Chen, Ray Jade

AU - Fang, Jen Feng

AU - Lin, Being Chuan

AU - Kao, Jung Liang

AU - Kao, Yi Chin

AU - Yu, Po Chin

AU - Wang, Yu Chun

AU - Chung, Ping Kuei

AU - Wong, Yon Cheong

AU - Wang, Li Jen

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - Background/Aims: Blunt pancreatic duct injury is difficult to differentiate, especially during surgery. In terms of demonstration of pancreatic duct injury, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) is the gold standard imaging study, however, availability can be problematic. Therefore, we have designed a method utilizing lesser-sac lavage to differentiate pancreatic duct injury. Methodology: Patients sustaining blunt pancreatic trauma treated at our institution over a two-year period were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Based on computed tomography (CT), these patients were divided into two groups: deep laceration or complete transection (Group 1) and superficial laceration (Group 2). Additionally, ten patients sustaining blunt abdominal trauma who had undergone emergency laparotomy for other visceral organ injury (Group 3) and four undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (Group 4) were selected as controls. For laparotomy in Groups 1-3, the lesser sac was opened for lavage, with 50mL of 0.9% normal saline inserted, and 3mL of the sample fluid withdrawn at four time points (15, 30, 45 and 60 mins) with the fluid immediately replaced with 3mL of saline. Lavage-ascites amylase (LAA) and lipase (LAL) levels were measured. Serum amylase and lipase activities were measured intraoperatively from 3mL of the patient's blood. Results: Over the two-year study period, there were four pancreatic duct transections (Group 1), five partial pancreatic lacerations confirmed by post-ERP CT (Group 2), ten non-pancreatic traumas (Group 3), and four pancreatoduodenectomies due to pancreatic-head cancer (Group 4). The LAA and LAL for Group 1 were significantly higher than those for Group 2 or 3 at each of the four time points. The LAA and LAL ratios for Group 1 relative to Group 2 or 3 decreased gradually over time. These LAA ratios ranged from 7-13 for Group 1 to Group 2, 138-232 for Group 1 to Group 3, and 17-21 for Group 2 to Group 3. By contrast, the LAL ratio ranged from 3.0-3.4 comparing Group 1 to Group 2, 3180-29124 for Group 1 to Group 3, and 1058-8705 for Group 2 to Group 3. Conclusions: Using lesser-sac lavage for measurement of LAA and LAL constitutes a rapid, non-invasive and effective method for detection of pancreatic duct injury, especially transection of the main duct. LAA appears to be a better indicator for differentiation of minor (superficial laceration or side branch) or major (MPD) pancreatic injury at the first time point (15 minutes post lavage) compared to LAL. By contrast, LAL appears to be a better indicator with respect to differentiation of the injured pancreas from the normal organ at this time point.

AB - Background/Aims: Blunt pancreatic duct injury is difficult to differentiate, especially during surgery. In terms of demonstration of pancreatic duct injury, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) is the gold standard imaging study, however, availability can be problematic. Therefore, we have designed a method utilizing lesser-sac lavage to differentiate pancreatic duct injury. Methodology: Patients sustaining blunt pancreatic trauma treated at our institution over a two-year period were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Based on computed tomography (CT), these patients were divided into two groups: deep laceration or complete transection (Group 1) and superficial laceration (Group 2). Additionally, ten patients sustaining blunt abdominal trauma who had undergone emergency laparotomy for other visceral organ injury (Group 3) and four undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (Group 4) were selected as controls. For laparotomy in Groups 1-3, the lesser sac was opened for lavage, with 50mL of 0.9% normal saline inserted, and 3mL of the sample fluid withdrawn at four time points (15, 30, 45 and 60 mins) with the fluid immediately replaced with 3mL of saline. Lavage-ascites amylase (LAA) and lipase (LAL) levels were measured. Serum amylase and lipase activities were measured intraoperatively from 3mL of the patient's blood. Results: Over the two-year study period, there were four pancreatic duct transections (Group 1), five partial pancreatic lacerations confirmed by post-ERP CT (Group 2), ten non-pancreatic traumas (Group 3), and four pancreatoduodenectomies due to pancreatic-head cancer (Group 4). The LAA and LAL for Group 1 were significantly higher than those for Group 2 or 3 at each of the four time points. The LAA and LAL ratios for Group 1 relative to Group 2 or 3 decreased gradually over time. These LAA ratios ranged from 7-13 for Group 1 to Group 2, 138-232 for Group 1 to Group 3, and 17-21 for Group 2 to Group 3. By contrast, the LAL ratio ranged from 3.0-3.4 comparing Group 1 to Group 2, 3180-29124 for Group 1 to Group 3, and 1058-8705 for Group 2 to Group 3. Conclusions: Using lesser-sac lavage for measurement of LAA and LAL constitutes a rapid, non-invasive and effective method for detection of pancreatic duct injury, especially transection of the main duct. LAA appears to be a better indicator for differentiation of minor (superficial laceration or side branch) or major (MPD) pancreatic injury at the first time point (15 minutes post lavage) compared to LAL. By contrast, LAL appears to be a better indicator with respect to differentiation of the injured pancreas from the normal organ at this time point.

KW - Amylase

KW - Blunt pancreatic duct injury

KW - Lesser-sac lavage

KW - Lipase

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248148990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248148990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 570

EP - 577

JO - Acta hepato-splenologica

JF - Acta hepato-splenologica

SN - 0172-6390

IS - 74

ER -