Left mediastinal width and mediastinal width ratio are better radiographic criteria than general mediastinal width for predicting blunt aortic injury

Yon Cheong Wong, Chip Jin Ng, Li Jen Wang, Kuang Hung Hsu, Chi Jen Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: General mediastinal width, left mediastinal width, and mediastinal width ratio were compared as radiographic predictors of aortic injury. Methods: A retrospective study investigated the chest radiographs of 51 patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center during a 6-year period for a thorough survey of aortic injury. Mediastinal width (MW ≥ 8 cm), left mediastinal width (LMW ≥ 6 cm), mediastinal width ratio (MWR ≥ 0.60), and a combination of LMW and MWR were compared as predictors of aortic injury. The cutoff points were predetermined by receiver-operator-curve to accommodate 100% sensitivity for each criterion. Results: Of the 51 patients, 21 had aortic injuries and 30 had normal imaging studies. All criteria had 100% negative predictive value. The specificities and positive predictive values, respectively, were 13.3% and 44.7% (MW), 40.0% and 53.8% (LMW), 43.3% and 55.3% (MWR), and 66.7% and 67.7% (combined LMW and MWR). The positive likelihood ratio of aortic injury was 3.00 when LMW was 6 cm or more and MWR was 0.60 or more. Conclusions: Both an LMW of 6 cm or more and an MWR of 0.60 or more are better radiographic criteria than an MW of 8 cm or more for predicting blunt aortic injury. Trauma patients with positive test results based on the combined LMW and MWR criteria should proceed immediately to aortography or helical computed tomography.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-94
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume57
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nonpenetrating Wounds
Wounds and Injuries
Aortography
Spiral Computed Tomography
Trauma Centers
Thorax
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Blunt aortic injury
  • Chest radiography
  • Left mediastinal width
  • Mediastinal width ratio
  • Predictive values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Left mediastinal width and mediastinal width ratio are better radiographic criteria than general mediastinal width for predicting blunt aortic injury. / Wong, Yon Cheong; Ng, Chip Jin; Wang, Li Jen; Hsu, Kuang Hung; Chen, Chi Jen.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 57, No. 1, 07.2004, p. 88-94.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7d3d50734cc84dcb8c8ea2459f83ba02,
title = "Left mediastinal width and mediastinal width ratio are better radiographic criteria than general mediastinal width for predicting blunt aortic injury",
abstract = "Background: General mediastinal width, left mediastinal width, and mediastinal width ratio were compared as radiographic predictors of aortic injury. Methods: A retrospective study investigated the chest radiographs of 51 patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center during a 6-year period for a thorough survey of aortic injury. Mediastinal width (MW ≥ 8 cm), left mediastinal width (LMW ≥ 6 cm), mediastinal width ratio (MWR ≥ 0.60), and a combination of LMW and MWR were compared as predictors of aortic injury. The cutoff points were predetermined by receiver-operator-curve to accommodate 100{\%} sensitivity for each criterion. Results: Of the 51 patients, 21 had aortic injuries and 30 had normal imaging studies. All criteria had 100{\%} negative predictive value. The specificities and positive predictive values, respectively, were 13.3{\%} and 44.7{\%} (MW), 40.0{\%} and 53.8{\%} (LMW), 43.3{\%} and 55.3{\%} (MWR), and 66.7{\%} and 67.7{\%} (combined LMW and MWR). The positive likelihood ratio of aortic injury was 3.00 when LMW was 6 cm or more and MWR was 0.60 or more. Conclusions: Both an LMW of 6 cm or more and an MWR of 0.60 or more are better radiographic criteria than an MW of 8 cm or more for predicting blunt aortic injury. Trauma patients with positive test results based on the combined LMW and MWR criteria should proceed immediately to aortography or helical computed tomography.",
keywords = "Blunt aortic injury, Chest radiography, Left mediastinal width, Mediastinal width ratio, Predictive values",
author = "Wong, {Yon Cheong} and Ng, {Chip Jin} and Wang, {Li Jen} and Hsu, {Kuang Hung} and Chen, {Chi Jen}",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "88--94",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Left mediastinal width and mediastinal width ratio are better radiographic criteria than general mediastinal width for predicting blunt aortic injury

AU - Wong, Yon Cheong

AU - Ng, Chip Jin

AU - Wang, Li Jen

AU - Hsu, Kuang Hung

AU - Chen, Chi Jen

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - Background: General mediastinal width, left mediastinal width, and mediastinal width ratio were compared as radiographic predictors of aortic injury. Methods: A retrospective study investigated the chest radiographs of 51 patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center during a 6-year period for a thorough survey of aortic injury. Mediastinal width (MW ≥ 8 cm), left mediastinal width (LMW ≥ 6 cm), mediastinal width ratio (MWR ≥ 0.60), and a combination of LMW and MWR were compared as predictors of aortic injury. The cutoff points were predetermined by receiver-operator-curve to accommodate 100% sensitivity for each criterion. Results: Of the 51 patients, 21 had aortic injuries and 30 had normal imaging studies. All criteria had 100% negative predictive value. The specificities and positive predictive values, respectively, were 13.3% and 44.7% (MW), 40.0% and 53.8% (LMW), 43.3% and 55.3% (MWR), and 66.7% and 67.7% (combined LMW and MWR). The positive likelihood ratio of aortic injury was 3.00 when LMW was 6 cm or more and MWR was 0.60 or more. Conclusions: Both an LMW of 6 cm or more and an MWR of 0.60 or more are better radiographic criteria than an MW of 8 cm or more for predicting blunt aortic injury. Trauma patients with positive test results based on the combined LMW and MWR criteria should proceed immediately to aortography or helical computed tomography.

AB - Background: General mediastinal width, left mediastinal width, and mediastinal width ratio were compared as radiographic predictors of aortic injury. Methods: A retrospective study investigated the chest radiographs of 51 patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center during a 6-year period for a thorough survey of aortic injury. Mediastinal width (MW ≥ 8 cm), left mediastinal width (LMW ≥ 6 cm), mediastinal width ratio (MWR ≥ 0.60), and a combination of LMW and MWR were compared as predictors of aortic injury. The cutoff points were predetermined by receiver-operator-curve to accommodate 100% sensitivity for each criterion. Results: Of the 51 patients, 21 had aortic injuries and 30 had normal imaging studies. All criteria had 100% negative predictive value. The specificities and positive predictive values, respectively, were 13.3% and 44.7% (MW), 40.0% and 53.8% (LMW), 43.3% and 55.3% (MWR), and 66.7% and 67.7% (combined LMW and MWR). The positive likelihood ratio of aortic injury was 3.00 when LMW was 6 cm or more and MWR was 0.60 or more. Conclusions: Both an LMW of 6 cm or more and an MWR of 0.60 or more are better radiographic criteria than an MW of 8 cm or more for predicting blunt aortic injury. Trauma patients with positive test results based on the combined LMW and MWR criteria should proceed immediately to aortography or helical computed tomography.

KW - Blunt aortic injury

KW - Chest radiography

KW - Left mediastinal width

KW - Mediastinal width ratio

KW - Predictive values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4043176947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4043176947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15284554

AN - SCOPUS:4043176947

VL - 57

SP - 88

EP - 94

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -