Learning curve of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in an Asian low-volume bariatric unit

Shih Chiang Shen, Chun Yi Tsai, Chien Hung Liao, Yu Yin Liu, Ta Sen Yeh, Keng Hao Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Obesity has become a healthcare burden in Taiwan and the rest of Asia. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) provides good weight loss outcome, and improves comorbidity as well as quality of life. We present our experience of the learning curve for LRYGB in a low-volume bariatric unit. Methods: From March 2009 to August 2011, 60 consecutive patients who underwent LRYGB were included. They were separated into two groups, with the first 30 cases in Group 1 and the remaining 30 cases in Group 2. Indicators for evaluating the learning curve for LRYGB included surgical time, rate of conversion to open surgery, surgical and total complication rates, length of hospital stay, mortality, and postoperative weight loss. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic measurements between the two groups. In Group 1, the median surgical time was 120 minutes and in Group 2 it was 80 minutes (p < 0.01). Two cases were converted to laparotomy in Group 1, but none in Group 2. There was no surgical mortality and the total complication rate of all patients was 16.7%. The complication rate significantly decreased from Group 1 (26.7%) to Group 2 (6.7%). Three patients needed further surgical procedures in Group 1, with no patients needing them in Group 2. There was no significant difference in hospital stay and percentage excess weight loss between the two groups. Conclusion: The learning curve for LRYGB has no mortality and an acceptable complication rate. The operating time and morbidity rate are the indicators for overcoming the learning curve.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-175
Number of pages6
JournalAsian Journal of Surgery
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bariatrics
Learning Curve
Gastric Bypass
Weight Loss
Length of Stay
Operative Time
Conversion to Open Surgery
Mortality
Hospital Mortality
Taiwan
Laparotomy
Comorbidity
Obesity
Quality of Life
Demography
Morbidity
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Asia
  • laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
  • learning curve
  • low-volume unit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Learning curve of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in an Asian low-volume bariatric unit. / Shen, Shih Chiang; Tsai, Chun Yi; Liao, Chien Hung; Liu, Yu Yin; Yeh, Ta Sen; Liu, Keng Hao.

In: Asian Journal of Surgery, Vol. 41, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 170-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shen, Shih Chiang ; Tsai, Chun Yi ; Liao, Chien Hung ; Liu, Yu Yin ; Yeh, Ta Sen ; Liu, Keng Hao. / Learning curve of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in an Asian low-volume bariatric unit. In: Asian Journal of Surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 170-175.
@article{00c34c3969af45df9d8ab134cc6b5221,
title = "Learning curve of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in an Asian low-volume bariatric unit",
abstract = "Background: Obesity has become a healthcare burden in Taiwan and the rest of Asia. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) provides good weight loss outcome, and improves comorbidity as well as quality of life. We present our experience of the learning curve for LRYGB in a low-volume bariatric unit. Methods: From March 2009 to August 2011, 60 consecutive patients who underwent LRYGB were included. They were separated into two groups, with the first 30 cases in Group 1 and the remaining 30 cases in Group 2. Indicators for evaluating the learning curve for LRYGB included surgical time, rate of conversion to open surgery, surgical and total complication rates, length of hospital stay, mortality, and postoperative weight loss. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic measurements between the two groups. In Group 1, the median surgical time was 120 minutes and in Group 2 it was 80 minutes (p < 0.01). Two cases were converted to laparotomy in Group 1, but none in Group 2. There was no surgical mortality and the total complication rate of all patients was 16.7{\%}. The complication rate significantly decreased from Group 1 (26.7{\%}) to Group 2 (6.7{\%}). Three patients needed further surgical procedures in Group 1, with no patients needing them in Group 2. There was no significant difference in hospital stay and percentage excess weight loss between the two groups. Conclusion: The learning curve for LRYGB has no mortality and an acceptable complication rate. The operating time and morbidity rate are the indicators for overcoming the learning curve.",
keywords = "Asia, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, learning curve, low-volume unit",
author = "Shen, {Shih Chiang} and Tsai, {Chun Yi} and Liao, {Chien Hung} and Liu, {Yu Yin} and Yeh, {Ta Sen} and Liu, {Keng Hao}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.007",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "170--175",
journal = "Asian Journal of Surgery",
issn = "1015-9584",
publisher = "Elsevier Taiwan LLC",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning curve of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in an Asian low-volume bariatric unit

AU - Shen, Shih Chiang

AU - Tsai, Chun Yi

AU - Liao, Chien Hung

AU - Liu, Yu Yin

AU - Yeh, Ta Sen

AU - Liu, Keng Hao

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Background: Obesity has become a healthcare burden in Taiwan and the rest of Asia. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) provides good weight loss outcome, and improves comorbidity as well as quality of life. We present our experience of the learning curve for LRYGB in a low-volume bariatric unit. Methods: From March 2009 to August 2011, 60 consecutive patients who underwent LRYGB were included. They were separated into two groups, with the first 30 cases in Group 1 and the remaining 30 cases in Group 2. Indicators for evaluating the learning curve for LRYGB included surgical time, rate of conversion to open surgery, surgical and total complication rates, length of hospital stay, mortality, and postoperative weight loss. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic measurements between the two groups. In Group 1, the median surgical time was 120 minutes and in Group 2 it was 80 minutes (p < 0.01). Two cases were converted to laparotomy in Group 1, but none in Group 2. There was no surgical mortality and the total complication rate of all patients was 16.7%. The complication rate significantly decreased from Group 1 (26.7%) to Group 2 (6.7%). Three patients needed further surgical procedures in Group 1, with no patients needing them in Group 2. There was no significant difference in hospital stay and percentage excess weight loss between the two groups. Conclusion: The learning curve for LRYGB has no mortality and an acceptable complication rate. The operating time and morbidity rate are the indicators for overcoming the learning curve.

AB - Background: Obesity has become a healthcare burden in Taiwan and the rest of Asia. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) provides good weight loss outcome, and improves comorbidity as well as quality of life. We present our experience of the learning curve for LRYGB in a low-volume bariatric unit. Methods: From March 2009 to August 2011, 60 consecutive patients who underwent LRYGB were included. They were separated into two groups, with the first 30 cases in Group 1 and the remaining 30 cases in Group 2. Indicators for evaluating the learning curve for LRYGB included surgical time, rate of conversion to open surgery, surgical and total complication rates, length of hospital stay, mortality, and postoperative weight loss. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic measurements between the two groups. In Group 1, the median surgical time was 120 minutes and in Group 2 it was 80 minutes (p < 0.01). Two cases were converted to laparotomy in Group 1, but none in Group 2. There was no surgical mortality and the total complication rate of all patients was 16.7%. The complication rate significantly decreased from Group 1 (26.7%) to Group 2 (6.7%). Three patients needed further surgical procedures in Group 1, with no patients needing them in Group 2. There was no significant difference in hospital stay and percentage excess weight loss between the two groups. Conclusion: The learning curve for LRYGB has no mortality and an acceptable complication rate. The operating time and morbidity rate are the indicators for overcoming the learning curve.

KW - Asia

KW - laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

KW - learning curve

KW - low-volume unit

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009811974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009811974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.007

DO - 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 28108085

AN - SCOPUS:85009811974

VL - 41

SP - 170

EP - 175

JO - Asian Journal of Surgery

JF - Asian Journal of Surgery

SN - 1015-9584

IS - 2

ER -