Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty and laparoscopic gastric bypass: A comparison

Wei Jei Lee; Ming Te Huang; Po Jui Yu; Weu Wang; Tai Chi Chen

doi:10.1381/096089204323093390

Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty and laparoscopic gastric bypass: A comparison

Wei Jei Lee, Ming Te Huang, Po Jui Yu, Weu Wang, Tai Chi Chen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and gastric bypass (GBP) are the two bariatric procedures recommended by NIH consensus conference. Recent advancement in laparoscopic (L) techniques has made LVBG and LGBP alternatives for the conventional open approach. Methods: From December 2000 to February 2002, 80 patients (24 men and 56 women; mean age 32 years, range 18-57) with morbid obesity (mean BMI 43.2 kg/m ², range 36-59.8) were enrolled in a prospective trial and randomly assigned to LVBG or LGBP. Changes in quality of life were assessed using the Gastro-intestinal quality of life index (GIQLI). Results: The conversion rate was zero for LVBG and 2.5% (1/40) for LGBP. There has been no mortality. Surgical time was significantly longer for LGBP (209 min vs 126 min for LVBG, P

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	626-634
Number of pages	9
Journal	Obesity Surgery
Volume	14
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1381/096089204323093390
Publication status	Published - May 2004
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Bariatric surgery
Gastric bypass
Laparoscopy
Morbid obesity
Randomized trial
Vertical banded gastroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1381/096089204323093390

Cite this

@article{b9eb73f7a5f244dba4c8c396617fbcc9,

title = "Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty and laparoscopic gastric bypass: A comparison",

abstract = "Background: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and gastric bypass (GBP) are the two bariatric procedures recommended by NIH consensus conference. Recent advancement in laparoscopic (L) techniques has made LVBG and LGBP alternatives for the conventional open approach. Methods: From December 2000 to February 2002, 80 patients (24 men and 56 women; mean age 32 years, range 18-57) with morbid obesity (mean BMI 43.2 kg/m 2, range 36-59.8) were enrolled in a prospective trial and randomly assigned to LVBG or LGBP. Changes in quality of life were assessed using the Gastro-intestinal quality of life index (GIQLI). Results: The conversion rate was zero for LVBG and 2.5% (1/40) for LGBP. There has been no mortality. Surgical time was significantly longer for LGBP (209 min vs 126 min for LVBG, P",

keywords = "Bariatric surgery, Gastric bypass, Laparoscopy, Morbid obesity, Randomized trial, Vertical banded gastroplasty",

author = "Lee, {Wei Jei} and Huang, {Ming Te} and Yu, {Po Jui} and Weu Wang and Chen, {Tai Chi}",

year = "2004",

month = may,

doi = "10.1381/096089204323093390",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "626--634",

journal = "Obesity Surgery",

issn = "0960-8923",

publisher = "Springer New York LLC",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty and laparoscopic gastric bypass

T2 - A comparison

AU - Lee, Wei Jei

AU - Huang, Ming Te

AU - Yu, Po Jui

AU - Wang, Weu

AU - Chen, Tai Chi

PY - 2004/5

Y1 - 2004/5

N2 - Background: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and gastric bypass (GBP) are the two bariatric procedures recommended by NIH consensus conference. Recent advancement in laparoscopic (L) techniques has made LVBG and LGBP alternatives for the conventional open approach. Methods: From December 2000 to February 2002, 80 patients (24 men and 56 women; mean age 32 years, range 18-57) with morbid obesity (mean BMI 43.2 kg/m 2, range 36-59.8) were enrolled in a prospective trial and randomly assigned to LVBG or LGBP. Changes in quality of life were assessed using the Gastro-intestinal quality of life index (GIQLI). Results: The conversion rate was zero for LVBG and 2.5% (1/40) for LGBP. There has been no mortality. Surgical time was significantly longer for LGBP (209 min vs 126 min for LVBG, P

AB - Background: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and gastric bypass (GBP) are the two bariatric procedures recommended by NIH consensus conference. Recent advancement in laparoscopic (L) techniques has made LVBG and LGBP alternatives for the conventional open approach. Methods: From December 2000 to February 2002, 80 patients (24 men and 56 women; mean age 32 years, range 18-57) with morbid obesity (mean BMI 43.2 kg/m 2, range 36-59.8) were enrolled in a prospective trial and randomly assigned to LVBG or LGBP. Changes in quality of life were assessed using the Gastro-intestinal quality of life index (GIQLI). Results: The conversion rate was zero for LVBG and 2.5% (1/40) for LGBP. There has been no mortality. Surgical time was significantly longer for LGBP (209 min vs 126 min for LVBG, P

KW - Bariatric surgery

KW - Gastric bypass

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Morbid obesity

KW - Randomized trial

KW - Vertical banded gastroplasty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2642541927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2642541927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1381/096089204323093390

DO - 10.1381/096089204323093390

M3 - Article

C2 - 15186629

AN - SCOPUS:2642541927

VL - 14

SP - 626

EP - 634

JO - Obesity Surgery

JF - Obesity Surgery

SN - 0960-8923

IS - 5

ER -

Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty and laparoscopic gastric bypass: A comparison

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this