Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity

A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

Wei Jei Lee, Po Jui Yu, Weu Wang, Tai Chi Chen, Po Li Wei, Ming Te Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

246 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This prospective, randomized trial compared the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) and laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGBP) in the treatment of morbid obesity. Summary Background Data: LRYGBP has been the gold standard for the treatment of morbid obesity. While LMGBP has been reported to be a simple and effective treatment, data from a randomized trial are lacking. Methods: Eighty patients who met the NIH criteria were recruited and randomized to receive either LRYGBP (n = 40) or LMGBP (n = 40). The minimum postoperative follow-up was 2 years (mean, 31.3 months). Perioperative data were assessed. Late complication, excess weight loss, BMI, quality of life, and comorbidities were determined. Changes in quality of life were assessed using the Gastro-Intestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Results: There was one conversion (2.5%) in the LRYGBP group. Operation time was shorter in LMGBP group (205 versus 148, P <0.05). There was no mortality in each group. The operative morbidity rate was higher in the LRYGBP group (20% versus 7.5%, P <0.05). The late complications rate was the same in the 2 groups (7.5%) with no reoperation. The percentage of excess weight loss was 58.7% and 60.0% at 1 and 2 years, respectively, in the LPYGBP group, and 64.9% and 64.4% in the LMGBP group. The residual excess weight

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-28
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume242
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gastric Bypass
Morbid Obesity
Randomized Controlled Trials
Therapeutics
Quality of Life
Weight Loss
Reoperation
Comorbidity
Morbidity
Safety
Weights and Measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity : A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. / Lee, Wei Jei; Yu, Po Jui; Wang, Weu; Chen, Tai Chi; Wei, Po Li; Huang, Ming Te.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 242, No. 1, 07.2005, p. 20-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{88f4d97848ac4cbf841f330baeb5f4c8,
title = "Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial",
abstract = "Objectives: This prospective, randomized trial compared the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) and laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGBP) in the treatment of morbid obesity. Summary Background Data: LRYGBP has been the gold standard for the treatment of morbid obesity. While LMGBP has been reported to be a simple and effective treatment, data from a randomized trial are lacking. Methods: Eighty patients who met the NIH criteria were recruited and randomized to receive either LRYGBP (n = 40) or LMGBP (n = 40). The minimum postoperative follow-up was 2 years (mean, 31.3 months). Perioperative data were assessed. Late complication, excess weight loss, BMI, quality of life, and comorbidities were determined. Changes in quality of life were assessed using the Gastro-Intestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Results: There was one conversion (2.5{\%}) in the LRYGBP group. Operation time was shorter in LMGBP group (205 versus 148, P <0.05). There was no mortality in each group. The operative morbidity rate was higher in the LRYGBP group (20{\%} versus 7.5{\%}, P <0.05). The late complications rate was the same in the 2 groups (7.5{\%}) with no reoperation. The percentage of excess weight loss was 58.7{\%} and 60.0{\%} at 1 and 2 years, respectively, in the LPYGBP group, and 64.9{\%} and 64.4{\%} in the LMGBP group. The residual excess weight",
author = "Lee, {Wei Jei} and Yu, {Po Jui} and Weu Wang and Chen, {Tai Chi} and Wei, {Po Li} and Huang, {Ming Te}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/01.sla.0000167762.46568.98",
language = "English",
volume = "242",
pages = "20--28",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity

T2 - A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

AU - Lee, Wei Jei

AU - Yu, Po Jui

AU - Wang, Weu

AU - Chen, Tai Chi

AU - Wei, Po Li

AU - Huang, Ming Te

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Objectives: This prospective, randomized trial compared the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) and laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGBP) in the treatment of morbid obesity. Summary Background Data: LRYGBP has been the gold standard for the treatment of morbid obesity. While LMGBP has been reported to be a simple and effective treatment, data from a randomized trial are lacking. Methods: Eighty patients who met the NIH criteria were recruited and randomized to receive either LRYGBP (n = 40) or LMGBP (n = 40). The minimum postoperative follow-up was 2 years (mean, 31.3 months). Perioperative data were assessed. Late complication, excess weight loss, BMI, quality of life, and comorbidities were determined. Changes in quality of life were assessed using the Gastro-Intestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Results: There was one conversion (2.5%) in the LRYGBP group. Operation time was shorter in LMGBP group (205 versus 148, P <0.05). There was no mortality in each group. The operative morbidity rate was higher in the LRYGBP group (20% versus 7.5%, P <0.05). The late complications rate was the same in the 2 groups (7.5%) with no reoperation. The percentage of excess weight loss was 58.7% and 60.0% at 1 and 2 years, respectively, in the LPYGBP group, and 64.9% and 64.4% in the LMGBP group. The residual excess weight

AB - Objectives: This prospective, randomized trial compared the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) and laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGBP) in the treatment of morbid obesity. Summary Background Data: LRYGBP has been the gold standard for the treatment of morbid obesity. While LMGBP has been reported to be a simple and effective treatment, data from a randomized trial are lacking. Methods: Eighty patients who met the NIH criteria were recruited and randomized to receive either LRYGBP (n = 40) or LMGBP (n = 40). The minimum postoperative follow-up was 2 years (mean, 31.3 months). Perioperative data were assessed. Late complication, excess weight loss, BMI, quality of life, and comorbidities were determined. Changes in quality of life were assessed using the Gastro-Intestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Results: There was one conversion (2.5%) in the LRYGBP group. Operation time was shorter in LMGBP group (205 versus 148, P <0.05). There was no mortality in each group. The operative morbidity rate was higher in the LRYGBP group (20% versus 7.5%, P <0.05). The late complications rate was the same in the 2 groups (7.5%) with no reoperation. The percentage of excess weight loss was 58.7% and 60.0% at 1 and 2 years, respectively, in the LPYGBP group, and 64.9% and 64.4% in the LMGBP group. The residual excess weight

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21344457210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21344457210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.sla.0000167762.46568.98

DO - 10.1097/01.sla.0000167762.46568.98

M3 - Article

VL - 242

SP - 20

EP - 28

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 1

ER -