Is gastric remnant cancer clinically different from primary gastric cancer?

Su Shun Lo, Chew Wun Wu, Mao-Chih Hsieh, Wing Yiu Lui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: Poorer survival, uncertain etiology and a possible surgically induced carcinoma prompted the question of whether the gastric remnant is a special form of gastric carcinoma. A retrospective study was done to see if gastric remnant cancer is clinically different from primary gastric cancer without consideration of its etiology. Materials and Methods: There are 77 patient with gastric remnant cancer diagnosed in our hospital in past 15 years. Thirty-two out of 77 patients underwent gastrectomy. Another 536 patients with primary gastric cancer and 73 patients with proximal third gastric cancer were used as the controls. The clinicopathological characteristics including gender, age, TNM tumor stage, Lauren's classification, degree of tumor cell differentiation, rate of curative resection and 5-year survival rate were analyzed to see if there is significant difference among the three groups. Results: Almost 90% of patients with gastric remnant cancer had a partial gastrectomy with Billroth II operation before and the median incubation interval was 24.5 years. Male predominance in gastric remnant cancer was shown in our series. However, the age distribution, TNM tumor stage, Lauren's classification, degree of tumor cell differentiation, rate of curative resection and 5-year survival after curative resection were no different among the three groups. Conclusion: There was no difference in clinical behavior of resected gastric remnant cancer from other gastric carcinoma. Since most of the tumors were detected too late to be resected, early detection is the only way to increase the resection rate and improve the survival. Annual endoscopic surveillance after gastrectomy was recommended for early detection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-301
Number of pages3
JournalHepato-Gastroenterology
Volume44
Issue number13
Publication statusPublished - Mar 11 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gastric Stump
Stomach Neoplasms
Gastrectomy
Neoplasms
Carcinoma
Cell Differentiation
Survival Rate
Gastroenterostomy
Survival
Age Distribution
Stomach
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Clinical behavior
  • Gastric remnant cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Is gastric remnant cancer clinically different from primary gastric cancer? / Lo, Su Shun; Wu, Chew Wun; Hsieh, Mao-Chih; Lui, Wing Yiu.

In: Hepato-Gastroenterology, Vol. 44, No. 13, 11.03.1997, p. 299-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lo, Su Shun ; Wu, Chew Wun ; Hsieh, Mao-Chih ; Lui, Wing Yiu. / Is gastric remnant cancer clinically different from primary gastric cancer?. In: Hepato-Gastroenterology. 1997 ; Vol. 44, No. 13. pp. 299-301.
@article{9b327ad61fe745f48a4159145bcde271,
title = "Is gastric remnant cancer clinically different from primary gastric cancer?",
abstract = "Background/Aims: Poorer survival, uncertain etiology and a possible surgically induced carcinoma prompted the question of whether the gastric remnant is a special form of gastric carcinoma. A retrospective study was done to see if gastric remnant cancer is clinically different from primary gastric cancer without consideration of its etiology. Materials and Methods: There are 77 patient with gastric remnant cancer diagnosed in our hospital in past 15 years. Thirty-two out of 77 patients underwent gastrectomy. Another 536 patients with primary gastric cancer and 73 patients with proximal third gastric cancer were used as the controls. The clinicopathological characteristics including gender, age, TNM tumor stage, Lauren's classification, degree of tumor cell differentiation, rate of curative resection and 5-year survival rate were analyzed to see if there is significant difference among the three groups. Results: Almost 90{\%} of patients with gastric remnant cancer had a partial gastrectomy with Billroth II operation before and the median incubation interval was 24.5 years. Male predominance in gastric remnant cancer was shown in our series. However, the age distribution, TNM tumor stage, Lauren's classification, degree of tumor cell differentiation, rate of curative resection and 5-year survival after curative resection were no different among the three groups. Conclusion: There was no difference in clinical behavior of resected gastric remnant cancer from other gastric carcinoma. Since most of the tumors were detected too late to be resected, early detection is the only way to increase the resection rate and improve the survival. Annual endoscopic surveillance after gastrectomy was recommended for early detection.",
keywords = "Clinical behavior, Gastric remnant cancer",
author = "Lo, {Su Shun} and Wu, {Chew Wun} and Mao-Chih Hsieh and Lui, {Wing Yiu}",
year = "1997",
month = "3",
day = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "299--301",
journal = "Acta hepato-splenologica",
issn = "0172-6390",
publisher = "H.G.E. Update Medical Publishing Ltd.",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is gastric remnant cancer clinically different from primary gastric cancer?

AU - Lo, Su Shun

AU - Wu, Chew Wun

AU - Hsieh, Mao-Chih

AU - Lui, Wing Yiu

PY - 1997/3/11

Y1 - 1997/3/11

N2 - Background/Aims: Poorer survival, uncertain etiology and a possible surgically induced carcinoma prompted the question of whether the gastric remnant is a special form of gastric carcinoma. A retrospective study was done to see if gastric remnant cancer is clinically different from primary gastric cancer without consideration of its etiology. Materials and Methods: There are 77 patient with gastric remnant cancer diagnosed in our hospital in past 15 years. Thirty-two out of 77 patients underwent gastrectomy. Another 536 patients with primary gastric cancer and 73 patients with proximal third gastric cancer were used as the controls. The clinicopathological characteristics including gender, age, TNM tumor stage, Lauren's classification, degree of tumor cell differentiation, rate of curative resection and 5-year survival rate were analyzed to see if there is significant difference among the three groups. Results: Almost 90% of patients with gastric remnant cancer had a partial gastrectomy with Billroth II operation before and the median incubation interval was 24.5 years. Male predominance in gastric remnant cancer was shown in our series. However, the age distribution, TNM tumor stage, Lauren's classification, degree of tumor cell differentiation, rate of curative resection and 5-year survival after curative resection were no different among the three groups. Conclusion: There was no difference in clinical behavior of resected gastric remnant cancer from other gastric carcinoma. Since most of the tumors were detected too late to be resected, early detection is the only way to increase the resection rate and improve the survival. Annual endoscopic surveillance after gastrectomy was recommended for early detection.

AB - Background/Aims: Poorer survival, uncertain etiology and a possible surgically induced carcinoma prompted the question of whether the gastric remnant is a special form of gastric carcinoma. A retrospective study was done to see if gastric remnant cancer is clinically different from primary gastric cancer without consideration of its etiology. Materials and Methods: There are 77 patient with gastric remnant cancer diagnosed in our hospital in past 15 years. Thirty-two out of 77 patients underwent gastrectomy. Another 536 patients with primary gastric cancer and 73 patients with proximal third gastric cancer were used as the controls. The clinicopathological characteristics including gender, age, TNM tumor stage, Lauren's classification, degree of tumor cell differentiation, rate of curative resection and 5-year survival rate were analyzed to see if there is significant difference among the three groups. Results: Almost 90% of patients with gastric remnant cancer had a partial gastrectomy with Billroth II operation before and the median incubation interval was 24.5 years. Male predominance in gastric remnant cancer was shown in our series. However, the age distribution, TNM tumor stage, Lauren's classification, degree of tumor cell differentiation, rate of curative resection and 5-year survival after curative resection were no different among the three groups. Conclusion: There was no difference in clinical behavior of resected gastric remnant cancer from other gastric carcinoma. Since most of the tumors were detected too late to be resected, early detection is the only way to increase the resection rate and improve the survival. Annual endoscopic surveillance after gastrectomy was recommended for early detection.

KW - Clinical behavior

KW - Gastric remnant cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031051330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031051330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 299

EP - 301

JO - Acta hepato-splenologica

JF - Acta hepato-splenologica

SN - 0172-6390

IS - 13

ER -