Interference screw versus Endoscrew fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

A biomechanical comparative study in sawbones and porcine knees

Chu-Chih Hung, Wen-Chuan Chen, Chan-Tsung Yang, Cheng Kung Cheng, Chih-Hwa Chen, Yu-Shu Lai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interference screw fixation is one of the most common methods for ligament reconstruction. Although the advantages and clinical outcomes of this procedure have been widely reported, post-surgical complications often arise. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new femoral fixation device, the Endoscrew, for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We performed a mechanical test in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards and an in vitro biomechanical study. An axial pullout test was conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties of the new device and the interference screw when implanted in solid rigid polyurethane foam test blocks. The biomechanical test used porcine femora to evaluate the initial fixation strength between these two implants. The maximum pullout force of the interference screw group [722.05 ± 130.49 N (N)] was significantly greater (p < 0.01) than the Endoscrew group (440.79 ± 26.54 N) when implanted in polyurethane foam 320 kg/m3 density. With polyurethane foam 160 kg/m3 density, the maximum pullout forces were (242.61 ± 37.36 N) (p < 0.001) and (99.33 ± 30.01 N) for the interference screw group and Endoscrew group, respectively. In the in vitro mechanical study, the Endoscrew (646.39 ± 72.38 N) required a significantly greater ultimate load prior to failure (p < 0.05) when compared with the interference screw (489.72 ± 138.64 N). With regard to pullout stiffness, there was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.13) between the Endoscrew group (99.15 ± 12.16 N/mm) and the interference screw group (87.96 ± 11.12 N/mm). The cyclic stiffness was also not significantly different (p < 0.44) between the Endoscrew group (93.09 ± 16.07 N/mm) and the interference screw group (85.78 ± 14.76 N/mm). The axial pullout test showed that the strength of the Endoscrew was close to the fixation strength required for daily activities, but it is inappropriate for use in osteoporotic patients. The in vitro study showed that the Endoscrew has a superior initial mechanical fixation over the biodegradable interference screw.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)82-90
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Translation
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Knee
Swine
Materials Testing
Equipment and Supplies
Thigh
Ligaments
Femur
polyurethane foam
In Vitro Techniques

Cite this

Interference screw versus Endoscrew fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : A biomechanical comparative study in sawbones and porcine knees. / Hung, Chu-Chih; Chen, Wen-Chuan; Yang, Chan-Tsung; Cheng, Cheng Kung; Chen, Chih-Hwa; Lai, Yu-Shu.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Translation, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2014, p. 82-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a59e19a4274c4e43845a52d4591ed637,
title = "Interference screw versus Endoscrew fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A biomechanical comparative study in sawbones and porcine knees",
abstract = "Interference screw fixation is one of the most common methods for ligament reconstruction. Although the advantages and clinical outcomes of this procedure have been widely reported, post-surgical complications often arise. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new femoral fixation device, the Endoscrew, for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We performed a mechanical test in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards and an in vitro biomechanical study. An axial pullout test was conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties of the new device and the interference screw when implanted in solid rigid polyurethane foam test blocks. The biomechanical test used porcine femora to evaluate the initial fixation strength between these two implants. The maximum pullout force of the interference screw group [722.05 ± 130.49 N (N)] was significantly greater (p < 0.01) than the Endoscrew group (440.79 ± 26.54 N) when implanted in polyurethane foam 320 kg/m3 density. With polyurethane foam 160 kg/m3 density, the maximum pullout forces were (242.61 ± 37.36 N) (p < 0.001) and (99.33 ± 30.01 N) for the interference screw group and Endoscrew group, respectively. In the in vitro mechanical study, the Endoscrew (646.39 ± 72.38 N) required a significantly greater ultimate load prior to failure (p < 0.05) when compared with the interference screw (489.72 ± 138.64 N). With regard to pullout stiffness, there was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.13) between the Endoscrew group (99.15 ± 12.16 N/mm) and the interference screw group (87.96 ± 11.12 N/mm). The cyclic stiffness was also not significantly different (p < 0.44) between the Endoscrew group (93.09 ± 16.07 N/mm) and the interference screw group (85.78 ± 14.76 N/mm). The axial pullout test showed that the strength of the Endoscrew was close to the fixation strength required for daily activities, but it is inappropriate for use in osteoporotic patients. The in vitro study showed that the Endoscrew has a superior initial mechanical fixation over the biodegradable interference screw.",
keywords = "Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Biomechanics, Knee, Orthopaedic fixation devices, Porcine model",
author = "Chu-Chih Hung and Wen-Chuan Chen and Chan-Tsung Yang and Cheng, {Cheng Kung} and Chih-Hwa Chen and Yu-Shu Lai",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.jot.2014.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "82--90",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Translation",
issn = "2214-031X",
publisher = "Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interference screw versus Endoscrew fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

T2 - A biomechanical comparative study in sawbones and porcine knees

AU - Hung, Chu-Chih

AU - Chen, Wen-Chuan

AU - Yang, Chan-Tsung

AU - Cheng, Cheng Kung

AU - Chen, Chih-Hwa

AU - Lai, Yu-Shu

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Interference screw fixation is one of the most common methods for ligament reconstruction. Although the advantages and clinical outcomes of this procedure have been widely reported, post-surgical complications often arise. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new femoral fixation device, the Endoscrew, for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We performed a mechanical test in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards and an in vitro biomechanical study. An axial pullout test was conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties of the new device and the interference screw when implanted in solid rigid polyurethane foam test blocks. The biomechanical test used porcine femora to evaluate the initial fixation strength between these two implants. The maximum pullout force of the interference screw group [722.05 ± 130.49 N (N)] was significantly greater (p < 0.01) than the Endoscrew group (440.79 ± 26.54 N) when implanted in polyurethane foam 320 kg/m3 density. With polyurethane foam 160 kg/m3 density, the maximum pullout forces were (242.61 ± 37.36 N) (p < 0.001) and (99.33 ± 30.01 N) for the interference screw group and Endoscrew group, respectively. In the in vitro mechanical study, the Endoscrew (646.39 ± 72.38 N) required a significantly greater ultimate load prior to failure (p < 0.05) when compared with the interference screw (489.72 ± 138.64 N). With regard to pullout stiffness, there was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.13) between the Endoscrew group (99.15 ± 12.16 N/mm) and the interference screw group (87.96 ± 11.12 N/mm). The cyclic stiffness was also not significantly different (p < 0.44) between the Endoscrew group (93.09 ± 16.07 N/mm) and the interference screw group (85.78 ± 14.76 N/mm). The axial pullout test showed that the strength of the Endoscrew was close to the fixation strength required for daily activities, but it is inappropriate for use in osteoporotic patients. The in vitro study showed that the Endoscrew has a superior initial mechanical fixation over the biodegradable interference screw.

AB - Interference screw fixation is one of the most common methods for ligament reconstruction. Although the advantages and clinical outcomes of this procedure have been widely reported, post-surgical complications often arise. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new femoral fixation device, the Endoscrew, for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We performed a mechanical test in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards and an in vitro biomechanical study. An axial pullout test was conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties of the new device and the interference screw when implanted in solid rigid polyurethane foam test blocks. The biomechanical test used porcine femora to evaluate the initial fixation strength between these two implants. The maximum pullout force of the interference screw group [722.05 ± 130.49 N (N)] was significantly greater (p < 0.01) than the Endoscrew group (440.79 ± 26.54 N) when implanted in polyurethane foam 320 kg/m3 density. With polyurethane foam 160 kg/m3 density, the maximum pullout forces were (242.61 ± 37.36 N) (p < 0.001) and (99.33 ± 30.01 N) for the interference screw group and Endoscrew group, respectively. In the in vitro mechanical study, the Endoscrew (646.39 ± 72.38 N) required a significantly greater ultimate load prior to failure (p < 0.05) when compared with the interference screw (489.72 ± 138.64 N). With regard to pullout stiffness, there was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.13) between the Endoscrew group (99.15 ± 12.16 N/mm) and the interference screw group (87.96 ± 11.12 N/mm). The cyclic stiffness was also not significantly different (p < 0.44) between the Endoscrew group (93.09 ± 16.07 N/mm) and the interference screw group (85.78 ± 14.76 N/mm). The axial pullout test showed that the strength of the Endoscrew was close to the fixation strength required for daily activities, but it is inappropriate for use in osteoporotic patients. The in vitro study showed that the Endoscrew has a superior initial mechanical fixation over the biodegradable interference screw.

KW - Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Knee

KW - Orthopaedic fixation devices

KW - Porcine model

U2 - 10.1016/j.jot.2014.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jot.2014.02.001

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 82

EP - 90

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Translation

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Translation

SN - 2214-031X

IS - 2

ER -