Initial Experience of Robotic Gastrectomy and Comparison with Open and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Kuo Hung Huang, Yuan Tzu Lan, Wen Liang Fang, Jen Hao Chen, Su Shun Lo, Mao Chih Hsieh, Anna Fen Yau Li, Shih Hwa Chiou, Chew Wun Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Robotic gastrectomy has become more popular in the treatment of gastric cancer, especially in Asian countries. Until now, few studies have compared robotic surgery with open or laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer patients. Methods: Data were prospectively collected between January 2006 and February 2012. A total of 689 patients underwent curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Patients were separated into three groups according to the different surgical approaches used (586 open, 64 laparoscopic, and 39 robotic). The clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of the three groups were compared. Results: The open group was associated with a larger tumor size, more D2 dissection, more advanced tumor stage, and more blood loss than the groups treated with laparoscopic and robotic methods. Robotic gastrectomy was associated with female predominance, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and longer operative time than open and laparoscopic gastrectomy. The retrieved lymph node numbers were similar between the open and robotic groups. Postoperative morbidity rates were similar among the three groups. In terms of the learning curve of robotic gastrectomy, operative time and docking time were significantly reduced in the recent robotic group (n = 14) compared to the initial robotic group (n = 25). Conclusion: Robotic gastrectomy could achieve extended lymph node dissection similar to open surgery. Our results showed a significant learning curve effect in the initial 25 cases of the robotic group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1303-1310
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume16
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Robotics
Gastrectomy
Stomach Neoplasms
Learning Curve
Operative Time
Blood Group Antigens
Lymph Node Excision
Laparoscopy
Dissection
Length of Stay
Neoplasms
Stomach
Adenocarcinoma
Lymph Nodes
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic
  • Open
  • Robotic gastrectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Initial Experience of Robotic Gastrectomy and Comparison with Open and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. / Huang, Kuo Hung; Lan, Yuan Tzu; Fang, Wen Liang; Chen, Jen Hao; Lo, Su Shun; Hsieh, Mao Chih; Li, Anna Fen Yau; Chiou, Shih Hwa; Wu, Chew Wun.

In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 16, No. 7, 07.2012, p. 1303-1310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huang, Kuo Hung ; Lan, Yuan Tzu ; Fang, Wen Liang ; Chen, Jen Hao ; Lo, Su Shun ; Hsieh, Mao Chih ; Li, Anna Fen Yau ; Chiou, Shih Hwa ; Wu, Chew Wun. / Initial Experience of Robotic Gastrectomy and Comparison with Open and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 16, No. 7. pp. 1303-1310.
@article{0eea559d27594f37986dc919d70a646b,
title = "Initial Experience of Robotic Gastrectomy and Comparison with Open and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer",
abstract = "Background: Robotic gastrectomy has become more popular in the treatment of gastric cancer, especially in Asian countries. Until now, few studies have compared robotic surgery with open or laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer patients. Methods: Data were prospectively collected between January 2006 and February 2012. A total of 689 patients underwent curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Patients were separated into three groups according to the different surgical approaches used (586 open, 64 laparoscopic, and 39 robotic). The clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of the three groups were compared. Results: The open group was associated with a larger tumor size, more D2 dissection, more advanced tumor stage, and more blood loss than the groups treated with laparoscopic and robotic methods. Robotic gastrectomy was associated with female predominance, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and longer operative time than open and laparoscopic gastrectomy. The retrieved lymph node numbers were similar between the open and robotic groups. Postoperative morbidity rates were similar among the three groups. In terms of the learning curve of robotic gastrectomy, operative time and docking time were significantly reduced in the recent robotic group (n = 14) compared to the initial robotic group (n = 25). Conclusion: Robotic gastrectomy could achieve extended lymph node dissection similar to open surgery. Our results showed a significant learning curve effect in the initial 25 cases of the robotic group.",
keywords = "Laparoscopic, Open, Robotic gastrectomy",
author = "Huang, {Kuo Hung} and Lan, {Yuan Tzu} and Fang, {Wen Liang} and Chen, {Jen Hao} and Lo, {Su Shun} and Hsieh, {Mao Chih} and Li, {Anna Fen Yau} and Chiou, {Shih Hwa} and Wu, {Chew Wun}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s11605-012-1874-x",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1303--1310",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Initial Experience of Robotic Gastrectomy and Comparison with Open and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

AU - Huang, Kuo Hung

AU - Lan, Yuan Tzu

AU - Fang, Wen Liang

AU - Chen, Jen Hao

AU - Lo, Su Shun

AU - Hsieh, Mao Chih

AU - Li, Anna Fen Yau

AU - Chiou, Shih Hwa

AU - Wu, Chew Wun

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Background: Robotic gastrectomy has become more popular in the treatment of gastric cancer, especially in Asian countries. Until now, few studies have compared robotic surgery with open or laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer patients. Methods: Data were prospectively collected between January 2006 and February 2012. A total of 689 patients underwent curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Patients were separated into three groups according to the different surgical approaches used (586 open, 64 laparoscopic, and 39 robotic). The clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of the three groups were compared. Results: The open group was associated with a larger tumor size, more D2 dissection, more advanced tumor stage, and more blood loss than the groups treated with laparoscopic and robotic methods. Robotic gastrectomy was associated with female predominance, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and longer operative time than open and laparoscopic gastrectomy. The retrieved lymph node numbers were similar between the open and robotic groups. Postoperative morbidity rates were similar among the three groups. In terms of the learning curve of robotic gastrectomy, operative time and docking time were significantly reduced in the recent robotic group (n = 14) compared to the initial robotic group (n = 25). Conclusion: Robotic gastrectomy could achieve extended lymph node dissection similar to open surgery. Our results showed a significant learning curve effect in the initial 25 cases of the robotic group.

AB - Background: Robotic gastrectomy has become more popular in the treatment of gastric cancer, especially in Asian countries. Until now, few studies have compared robotic surgery with open or laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer patients. Methods: Data were prospectively collected between January 2006 and February 2012. A total of 689 patients underwent curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Patients were separated into three groups according to the different surgical approaches used (586 open, 64 laparoscopic, and 39 robotic). The clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of the three groups were compared. Results: The open group was associated with a larger tumor size, more D2 dissection, more advanced tumor stage, and more blood loss than the groups treated with laparoscopic and robotic methods. Robotic gastrectomy was associated with female predominance, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and longer operative time than open and laparoscopic gastrectomy. The retrieved lymph node numbers were similar between the open and robotic groups. Postoperative morbidity rates were similar among the three groups. In terms of the learning curve of robotic gastrectomy, operative time and docking time were significantly reduced in the recent robotic group (n = 14) compared to the initial robotic group (n = 25). Conclusion: Robotic gastrectomy could achieve extended lymph node dissection similar to open surgery. Our results showed a significant learning curve effect in the initial 25 cases of the robotic group.

KW - Laparoscopic

KW - Open

KW - Robotic gastrectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862778699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862778699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11605-012-1874-x

DO - 10.1007/s11605-012-1874-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22450954

AN - SCOPUS:84862778699

VL - 16

SP - 1303

EP - 1310

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

IS - 7

ER -