Individualized management of upper rectal atresia

Chih Cheng Luo, Yung Ching Ming, Shih Ming Chu, Hsun Chin Chao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Purpose: Congenital colonic atresia (CA) or stenosis is an infrequent cause of low intestinal obstruction in the neonate. Atresias can occur at any level, and the management of CA is determined by the atretic site and by the presence or absence of associated anomalies. We report our experience dealing with upper rectal atresia during a 5-year period. Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2008, 3 female newborns with upper rectal atresia with or without associated anomalies were treated. Modes of clinical presentation, methods of diagnosis, associated anomalies, alternative management techniques, and clinical outcome were retrospectively analyzed. Results: All 3 patients had progressive abdominal distension, bilious vomiting, and failure to pass meconium. Contrast enema showed an atresia at the upper rectum in 2 patients. At laparotomy, case 1 was found to have type III atresia of the upper rectum. Resection of the dilated portion of the proximal colon with end sigmoid colostomy was accomplished in the neonatal period followed by a transanal mucosectomy with takedown of the colostomy and a pull-through procedure at age 3 months. Case 3 had multiple jejunoileal atresias and an upper rectal atresia. The initial management was multiple resections of atretic bowel and anastomoses and an end sigmoid colostomy. The secondary procedure was a takedown of the colostomy and transanal mucosectomy with a pull-through procedure. Case 2 had type I upper rectal atresia in association with imperforate anus complicated by colon perforation during performance of a distal colostogram leading to a complicated and protracted clinical course. All the patients are currently well with voluntary bowel movements, and one has occasional soiling with follow-up of 9 months to 3 years. Conclusions: Colon atresia, especially at the level of the upper rectum, is uncommon. Whether to proceed with an ostomy or to individualize the operative procedure according to the location of the atresia is still controversial. Transanal mucosectomy was a useful technique at the time of the definitive pull-through for the treatment of upper rectal atresia. In cases of upper CA associated with imperforate anus, delay in diagnosis and potential complications may result if the diagnosis of upper rectal atresia is missed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2406-2409
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume44
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colostomy
Rectum
Imperforate Anus
Colon
Sigmoid Colon
Newborn Infant
Ostomy
Meconium
Intestinal Obstruction
Enema
Operative Surgical Procedures
Laparotomy
Vomiting
Pathologic Constriction
Colonic Atresia
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Colonic atresia
  • Imperforate anus
  • Transanal mucosectomy
  • Upper rectal atresia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Surgery

Cite this

Luo, C. C., Ming, Y. C., Chu, S. M., & Chao, H. C. (2009). Individualized management of upper rectal atresia. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 44(12), 2406-2409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.09.016

Individualized management of upper rectal atresia. / Luo, Chih Cheng; Ming, Yung Ching; Chu, Shih Ming; Chao, Hsun Chin.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 44, No. 12, 12.2009, p. 2406-2409.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Luo, CC, Ming, YC, Chu, SM & Chao, HC 2009, 'Individualized management of upper rectal atresia', Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 2406-2409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.09.016
Luo, Chih Cheng ; Ming, Yung Ching ; Chu, Shih Ming ; Chao, Hsun Chin. / Individualized management of upper rectal atresia. In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 44, No. 12. pp. 2406-2409.
@article{ba4835b2996f4d589ce6a7fddfd21fa0,
title = "Individualized management of upper rectal atresia",
abstract = "Background/Purpose: Congenital colonic atresia (CA) or stenosis is an infrequent cause of low intestinal obstruction in the neonate. Atresias can occur at any level, and the management of CA is determined by the atretic site and by the presence or absence of associated anomalies. We report our experience dealing with upper rectal atresia during a 5-year period. Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2008, 3 female newborns with upper rectal atresia with or without associated anomalies were treated. Modes of clinical presentation, methods of diagnosis, associated anomalies, alternative management techniques, and clinical outcome were retrospectively analyzed. Results: All 3 patients had progressive abdominal distension, bilious vomiting, and failure to pass meconium. Contrast enema showed an atresia at the upper rectum in 2 patients. At laparotomy, case 1 was found to have type III atresia of the upper rectum. Resection of the dilated portion of the proximal colon with end sigmoid colostomy was accomplished in the neonatal period followed by a transanal mucosectomy with takedown of the colostomy and a pull-through procedure at age 3 months. Case 3 had multiple jejunoileal atresias and an upper rectal atresia. The initial management was multiple resections of atretic bowel and anastomoses and an end sigmoid colostomy. The secondary procedure was a takedown of the colostomy and transanal mucosectomy with a pull-through procedure. Case 2 had type I upper rectal atresia in association with imperforate anus complicated by colon perforation during performance of a distal colostogram leading to a complicated and protracted clinical course. All the patients are currently well with voluntary bowel movements, and one has occasional soiling with follow-up of 9 months to 3 years. Conclusions: Colon atresia, especially at the level of the upper rectum, is uncommon. Whether to proceed with an ostomy or to individualize the operative procedure according to the location of the atresia is still controversial. Transanal mucosectomy was a useful technique at the time of the definitive pull-through for the treatment of upper rectal atresia. In cases of upper CA associated with imperforate anus, delay in diagnosis and potential complications may result if the diagnosis of upper rectal atresia is missed.",
keywords = "Colonic atresia, Imperforate anus, Transanal mucosectomy, Upper rectal atresia",
author = "Luo, {Chih Cheng} and Ming, {Yung Ching} and Chu, {Shih Ming} and Chao, {Hsun Chin}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.09.016",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "2406--2409",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individualized management of upper rectal atresia

AU - Luo, Chih Cheng

AU - Ming, Yung Ching

AU - Chu, Shih Ming

AU - Chao, Hsun Chin

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Background/Purpose: Congenital colonic atresia (CA) or stenosis is an infrequent cause of low intestinal obstruction in the neonate. Atresias can occur at any level, and the management of CA is determined by the atretic site and by the presence or absence of associated anomalies. We report our experience dealing with upper rectal atresia during a 5-year period. Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2008, 3 female newborns with upper rectal atresia with or without associated anomalies were treated. Modes of clinical presentation, methods of diagnosis, associated anomalies, alternative management techniques, and clinical outcome were retrospectively analyzed. Results: All 3 patients had progressive abdominal distension, bilious vomiting, and failure to pass meconium. Contrast enema showed an atresia at the upper rectum in 2 patients. At laparotomy, case 1 was found to have type III atresia of the upper rectum. Resection of the dilated portion of the proximal colon with end sigmoid colostomy was accomplished in the neonatal period followed by a transanal mucosectomy with takedown of the colostomy and a pull-through procedure at age 3 months. Case 3 had multiple jejunoileal atresias and an upper rectal atresia. The initial management was multiple resections of atretic bowel and anastomoses and an end sigmoid colostomy. The secondary procedure was a takedown of the colostomy and transanal mucosectomy with a pull-through procedure. Case 2 had type I upper rectal atresia in association with imperforate anus complicated by colon perforation during performance of a distal colostogram leading to a complicated and protracted clinical course. All the patients are currently well with voluntary bowel movements, and one has occasional soiling with follow-up of 9 months to 3 years. Conclusions: Colon atresia, especially at the level of the upper rectum, is uncommon. Whether to proceed with an ostomy or to individualize the operative procedure according to the location of the atresia is still controversial. Transanal mucosectomy was a useful technique at the time of the definitive pull-through for the treatment of upper rectal atresia. In cases of upper CA associated with imperforate anus, delay in diagnosis and potential complications may result if the diagnosis of upper rectal atresia is missed.

AB - Background/Purpose: Congenital colonic atresia (CA) or stenosis is an infrequent cause of low intestinal obstruction in the neonate. Atresias can occur at any level, and the management of CA is determined by the atretic site and by the presence or absence of associated anomalies. We report our experience dealing with upper rectal atresia during a 5-year period. Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2008, 3 female newborns with upper rectal atresia with or without associated anomalies were treated. Modes of clinical presentation, methods of diagnosis, associated anomalies, alternative management techniques, and clinical outcome were retrospectively analyzed. Results: All 3 patients had progressive abdominal distension, bilious vomiting, and failure to pass meconium. Contrast enema showed an atresia at the upper rectum in 2 patients. At laparotomy, case 1 was found to have type III atresia of the upper rectum. Resection of the dilated portion of the proximal colon with end sigmoid colostomy was accomplished in the neonatal period followed by a transanal mucosectomy with takedown of the colostomy and a pull-through procedure at age 3 months. Case 3 had multiple jejunoileal atresias and an upper rectal atresia. The initial management was multiple resections of atretic bowel and anastomoses and an end sigmoid colostomy. The secondary procedure was a takedown of the colostomy and transanal mucosectomy with a pull-through procedure. Case 2 had type I upper rectal atresia in association with imperforate anus complicated by colon perforation during performance of a distal colostogram leading to a complicated and protracted clinical course. All the patients are currently well with voluntary bowel movements, and one has occasional soiling with follow-up of 9 months to 3 years. Conclusions: Colon atresia, especially at the level of the upper rectum, is uncommon. Whether to proceed with an ostomy or to individualize the operative procedure according to the location of the atresia is still controversial. Transanal mucosectomy was a useful technique at the time of the definitive pull-through for the treatment of upper rectal atresia. In cases of upper CA associated with imperforate anus, delay in diagnosis and potential complications may result if the diagnosis of upper rectal atresia is missed.

KW - Colonic atresia

KW - Imperforate anus

KW - Transanal mucosectomy

KW - Upper rectal atresia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71949092975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71949092975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.09.016

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.09.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 20006038

AN - SCOPUS:71949092975

VL - 44

SP - 2406

EP - 2409

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 12

ER -