How Plastic Surgeons Value Professionalism: Using Q Methodology to Explore the Prioritization of Professionalism

Chiung Hsuan Chiu, Su Chin Pan, Yi Chieh Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Medicine is no longer limited to the treatment of diseases - the use of plastic surgical techniques as a commodity to improve the appearance of healthy people has become a trend, and plastic surgeons who invest in the market of cosmetic medicine have quickly gained considerable benefits. Will the transformation of the role of plastic surgeons from aesthetic restoration to commercial embellishment damage the creation and maintenance of their sense of professionalism? Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine, by utilizing Q methodology, which aspects of professionalism plastic surgeons value. Methods: Q methodology is a mixed research method employed to study subjectivity through factor analysis. This study analyzes a rank-ordering of participants' level of agreement with a set of subjective statements related to a given topic. Q statements were developed on the basis of a literature review, expert panels, and medical organizations' codes of conduct. After face and construct validity checks, as well as a pilot test, we interviewed 31 attending plastic surgeons. Data were collected from April to May 2017. Results: This study concluded that the main types of medical professionalism held by the respondents can be represented in 4 factors: (1) mastery of clinical skills, (2) leadership and management, (3) knowledge sharing, and (4) multifaceted. Conclusions: Respondents in this study highly emphasized surgical skill and sought to maintain good relationships with their patients based on their settings. Although they were reluctant to place community service as a top priority, our respondents tended to emphasize the healer aspect over commercialization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1412-1422
Number of pages11
JournalAesthetic Surgery Journal
Volume39
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 13 2019

Fingerprint

Medicine
Knowledge Management
Clinical Competence
Social Welfare
Esthetics
Reproducibility of Results
Cosmetics
Statistical Factor Analysis
Maintenance
Organizations
Professionalism
Surgeons
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

How Plastic Surgeons Value Professionalism : Using Q Methodology to Explore the Prioritization of Professionalism. / Chiu, Chiung Hsuan; Pan, Su Chin; Lin, Yi Chieh.

In: Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Vol. 39, No. 12, 13.11.2019, p. 1412-1422.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7d3a1c11d05e456da10db4dd6a3ff605,
title = "How Plastic Surgeons Value Professionalism: Using Q Methodology to Explore the Prioritization of Professionalism",
abstract = "Background: Medicine is no longer limited to the treatment of diseases - the use of plastic surgical techniques as a commodity to improve the appearance of healthy people has become a trend, and plastic surgeons who invest in the market of cosmetic medicine have quickly gained considerable benefits. Will the transformation of the role of plastic surgeons from aesthetic restoration to commercial embellishment damage the creation and maintenance of their sense of professionalism? Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine, by utilizing Q methodology, which aspects of professionalism plastic surgeons value. Methods: Q methodology is a mixed research method employed to study subjectivity through factor analysis. This study analyzes a rank-ordering of participants' level of agreement with a set of subjective statements related to a given topic. Q statements were developed on the basis of a literature review, expert panels, and medical organizations' codes of conduct. After face and construct validity checks, as well as a pilot test, we interviewed 31 attending plastic surgeons. Data were collected from April to May 2017. Results: This study concluded that the main types of medical professionalism held by the respondents can be represented in 4 factors: (1) mastery of clinical skills, (2) leadership and management, (3) knowledge sharing, and (4) multifaceted. Conclusions: Respondents in this study highly emphasized surgical skill and sought to maintain good relationships with their patients based on their settings. Although they were reluctant to place community service as a top priority, our respondents tended to emphasize the healer aspect over commercialization.",
author = "Chiu, {Chiung Hsuan} and Pan, {Su Chin} and Lin, {Yi Chieh}",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1093/asj/sjz148",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1412--1422",
journal = "Aesthetic Surgery Journal",
issn = "1090-820X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Plastic Surgeons Value Professionalism

T2 - Using Q Methodology to Explore the Prioritization of Professionalism

AU - Chiu, Chiung Hsuan

AU - Pan, Su Chin

AU - Lin, Yi Chieh

PY - 2019/11/13

Y1 - 2019/11/13

N2 - Background: Medicine is no longer limited to the treatment of diseases - the use of plastic surgical techniques as a commodity to improve the appearance of healthy people has become a trend, and plastic surgeons who invest in the market of cosmetic medicine have quickly gained considerable benefits. Will the transformation of the role of plastic surgeons from aesthetic restoration to commercial embellishment damage the creation and maintenance of their sense of professionalism? Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine, by utilizing Q methodology, which aspects of professionalism plastic surgeons value. Methods: Q methodology is a mixed research method employed to study subjectivity through factor analysis. This study analyzes a rank-ordering of participants' level of agreement with a set of subjective statements related to a given topic. Q statements were developed on the basis of a literature review, expert panels, and medical organizations' codes of conduct. After face and construct validity checks, as well as a pilot test, we interviewed 31 attending plastic surgeons. Data were collected from April to May 2017. Results: This study concluded that the main types of medical professionalism held by the respondents can be represented in 4 factors: (1) mastery of clinical skills, (2) leadership and management, (3) knowledge sharing, and (4) multifaceted. Conclusions: Respondents in this study highly emphasized surgical skill and sought to maintain good relationships with their patients based on their settings. Although they were reluctant to place community service as a top priority, our respondents tended to emphasize the healer aspect over commercialization.

AB - Background: Medicine is no longer limited to the treatment of diseases - the use of plastic surgical techniques as a commodity to improve the appearance of healthy people has become a trend, and plastic surgeons who invest in the market of cosmetic medicine have quickly gained considerable benefits. Will the transformation of the role of plastic surgeons from aesthetic restoration to commercial embellishment damage the creation and maintenance of their sense of professionalism? Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine, by utilizing Q methodology, which aspects of professionalism plastic surgeons value. Methods: Q methodology is a mixed research method employed to study subjectivity through factor analysis. This study analyzes a rank-ordering of participants' level of agreement with a set of subjective statements related to a given topic. Q statements were developed on the basis of a literature review, expert panels, and medical organizations' codes of conduct. After face and construct validity checks, as well as a pilot test, we interviewed 31 attending plastic surgeons. Data were collected from April to May 2017. Results: This study concluded that the main types of medical professionalism held by the respondents can be represented in 4 factors: (1) mastery of clinical skills, (2) leadership and management, (3) knowledge sharing, and (4) multifaceted. Conclusions: Respondents in this study highly emphasized surgical skill and sought to maintain good relationships with their patients based on their settings. Although they were reluctant to place community service as a top priority, our respondents tended to emphasize the healer aspect over commercialization.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074964859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074964859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/asj/sjz148

DO - 10.1093/asj/sjz148

M3 - Article

C2 - 31095281

AN - SCOPUS:85074964859

VL - 39

SP - 1412

EP - 1422

JO - Aesthetic Surgery Journal

JF - Aesthetic Surgery Journal

SN - 1090-820X

IS - 12

ER -