Heart rate variability in patients with atrioventricular block.

H. C. Hsiao, H. W. Chiu, S. C. Lee, T. Kao, H. Y. Chang, C. W. Kong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis has been an established method for assessment of the activities of autonomic nervous system. Conventionally, the RR intervals from the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) are used for HRV analysis, however, analysis of the RR intervals may not be suitable in patients with atrioventricular (AV) node dysfunction, particularly in patients with certain degree of AV block. We used an esophageal electrode to detect PP intervals for HRV analysis in these patients. METHODS: Seven AV block patients and 13 subjects with normal AV conduction (control group) were enrolled in this study. The signals from esophageal lead, surface lead and intraatrial lead were recorded. Correlation coefficient of heart beat intervals from different leads was analyzed. Then we compared the HRV parameter recorded by esophageal lead between AV block patients and the control group. RESULTS: The AA intervals in intraatrial ECG and the PP intervals in surface ECG were poorly correlated (r = 0.489) in the AV block patients. However, intraatrial ECG was correlated well with esophageal ECG (r = 0.968). HRV with time domain decreased significantly in patients with AV block. The standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN), pNN-50 and r-MSSD in the control group and the AV block patients were 0.035 +/- 0.006 vs. 0.021 +/- 0.016 seconds (p = 0.002), 3.210 +/- 3.120 vs. 0.050 +/- 0.040% (p = 0.027) and 0.577 +/- 0.181 vs. 0.318 +/- 0.084 seconds (p = 0.009), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The esophageal lead recording is a non-invasive, easy and safe method to detect HRV of AV block patients whose vagal activity is abnormal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-85
Number of pages5
JournalChinese Medical Journal (Taipei)
Volume60
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Atrioventricular Block
Heart Rate
Electrocardiography
Control Groups
Atrioventricular Node
Autonomic Nervous System
Electrodes
Lead

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Hsiao, H. C., Chiu, H. W., Lee, S. C., Kao, T., Chang, H. Y., & Kong, C. W. (1997). Heart rate variability in patients with atrioventricular block. Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei), 60(2), 81-85.

Heart rate variability in patients with atrioventricular block. / Hsiao, H. C.; Chiu, H. W.; Lee, S. C.; Kao, T.; Chang, H. Y.; Kong, C. W.

In: Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei), Vol. 60, No. 2, 08.1997, p. 81-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hsiao, HC, Chiu, HW, Lee, SC, Kao, T, Chang, HY & Kong, CW 1997, 'Heart rate variability in patients with atrioventricular block.', Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei), vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 81-85.
Hsiao, H. C. ; Chiu, H. W. ; Lee, S. C. ; Kao, T. ; Chang, H. Y. ; Kong, C. W. / Heart rate variability in patients with atrioventricular block. In: Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei). 1997 ; Vol. 60, No. 2. pp. 81-85.
@article{b425f366febf4fb991bab0f1543ea367,
title = "Heart rate variability in patients with atrioventricular block.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis has been an established method for assessment of the activities of autonomic nervous system. Conventionally, the RR intervals from the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) are used for HRV analysis, however, analysis of the RR intervals may not be suitable in patients with atrioventricular (AV) node dysfunction, particularly in patients with certain degree of AV block. We used an esophageal electrode to detect PP intervals for HRV analysis in these patients. METHODS: Seven AV block patients and 13 subjects with normal AV conduction (control group) were enrolled in this study. The signals from esophageal lead, surface lead and intraatrial lead were recorded. Correlation coefficient of heart beat intervals from different leads was analyzed. Then we compared the HRV parameter recorded by esophageal lead between AV block patients and the control group. RESULTS: The AA intervals in intraatrial ECG and the PP intervals in surface ECG were poorly correlated (r = 0.489) in the AV block patients. However, intraatrial ECG was correlated well with esophageal ECG (r = 0.968). HRV with time domain decreased significantly in patients with AV block. The standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN), pNN-50 and r-MSSD in the control group and the AV block patients were 0.035 +/- 0.006 vs. 0.021 +/- 0.016 seconds (p = 0.002), 3.210 +/- 3.120 vs. 0.050 +/- 0.040{\%} (p = 0.027) and 0.577 +/- 0.181 vs. 0.318 +/- 0.084 seconds (p = 0.009), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The esophageal lead recording is a non-invasive, easy and safe method to detect HRV of AV block patients whose vagal activity is abnormal.",
author = "Hsiao, {H. C.} and Chiu, {H. W.} and Lee, {S. C.} and T. Kao and Chang, {H. Y.} and Kong, {C. W.}",
year = "1997",
month = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "81--85",
journal = "Journal of the Chinese Medical Association",
issn = "1726-4901",
publisher = "Elsevier Taiwan LLC",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heart rate variability in patients with atrioventricular block.

AU - Hsiao, H. C.

AU - Chiu, H. W.

AU - Lee, S. C.

AU - Kao, T.

AU - Chang, H. Y.

AU - Kong, C. W.

PY - 1997/8

Y1 - 1997/8

N2 - BACKGROUND: Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis has been an established method for assessment of the activities of autonomic nervous system. Conventionally, the RR intervals from the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) are used for HRV analysis, however, analysis of the RR intervals may not be suitable in patients with atrioventricular (AV) node dysfunction, particularly in patients with certain degree of AV block. We used an esophageal electrode to detect PP intervals for HRV analysis in these patients. METHODS: Seven AV block patients and 13 subjects with normal AV conduction (control group) were enrolled in this study. The signals from esophageal lead, surface lead and intraatrial lead were recorded. Correlation coefficient of heart beat intervals from different leads was analyzed. Then we compared the HRV parameter recorded by esophageal lead between AV block patients and the control group. RESULTS: The AA intervals in intraatrial ECG and the PP intervals in surface ECG were poorly correlated (r = 0.489) in the AV block patients. However, intraatrial ECG was correlated well with esophageal ECG (r = 0.968). HRV with time domain decreased significantly in patients with AV block. The standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN), pNN-50 and r-MSSD in the control group and the AV block patients were 0.035 +/- 0.006 vs. 0.021 +/- 0.016 seconds (p = 0.002), 3.210 +/- 3.120 vs. 0.050 +/- 0.040% (p = 0.027) and 0.577 +/- 0.181 vs. 0.318 +/- 0.084 seconds (p = 0.009), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The esophageal lead recording is a non-invasive, easy and safe method to detect HRV of AV block patients whose vagal activity is abnormal.

AB - BACKGROUND: Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis has been an established method for assessment of the activities of autonomic nervous system. Conventionally, the RR intervals from the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) are used for HRV analysis, however, analysis of the RR intervals may not be suitable in patients with atrioventricular (AV) node dysfunction, particularly in patients with certain degree of AV block. We used an esophageal electrode to detect PP intervals for HRV analysis in these patients. METHODS: Seven AV block patients and 13 subjects with normal AV conduction (control group) were enrolled in this study. The signals from esophageal lead, surface lead and intraatrial lead were recorded. Correlation coefficient of heart beat intervals from different leads was analyzed. Then we compared the HRV parameter recorded by esophageal lead between AV block patients and the control group. RESULTS: The AA intervals in intraatrial ECG and the PP intervals in surface ECG were poorly correlated (r = 0.489) in the AV block patients. However, intraatrial ECG was correlated well with esophageal ECG (r = 0.968). HRV with time domain decreased significantly in patients with AV block. The standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN), pNN-50 and r-MSSD in the control group and the AV block patients were 0.035 +/- 0.006 vs. 0.021 +/- 0.016 seconds (p = 0.002), 3.210 +/- 3.120 vs. 0.050 +/- 0.040% (p = 0.027) and 0.577 +/- 0.181 vs. 0.318 +/- 0.084 seconds (p = 0.009), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The esophageal lead recording is a non-invasive, easy and safe method to detect HRV of AV block patients whose vagal activity is abnormal.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031202412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031202412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9360332

AN - SCOPUS:0031202412

VL - 60

SP - 81

EP - 85

JO - Journal of the Chinese Medical Association

JF - Journal of the Chinese Medical Association

SN - 1726-4901

IS - 2

ER -