Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index, a Simplified Nutritional Screening Index, Is a Strong Predictor of Handgrip Strength in Renal Transplant Recipients

I. H. Lin, T. C. Wong, S. W. Nien, H. H. Wang, Y. J. Chiang, S. H. Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a useful predictor of prognosis in older patients and those receiving hemodialysis. However, the predictive value of the GNRI in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) is unclear. In this study we investigated the correlation between the GNRI and muscle function, as indicated by handgrip strength (HGS). Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed on 42 RTRs (50% women), with a mean age of 49.0 ± 10.8 years. The GNRI was derived from patients’ body weight and serum albumin level by using the following equation: GNRI = [14.89 × albumin (g/dL)] + [41.7 × (body weight/ideal body weight)]. HGS was evaluated in dominant arms; HGS measurement was repeated 3 times, and the highest value was used. Multivariable stepwise regression analyses were performed to obtain adjusted correlates, and the significance levels for entry and remaining were set at 0.1. Results: The mean values of the GNRI and HGS were 105.0 ± 5.4 and 29.0 ± 9.4, respectively. The GNRI was positively correlated with HGS (r = 0.36, P =.02). Linear and stepwise multivariable adjustment analyses revealed that the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and GNRI were independent determinants of HGS (β HOMA-IR = 0.53 and β GNRI = 0.43, adjusted R 2 = 0.45) after adjustment for age, sex, total muscle mass, and C-reactive protein level as covariates. Conclusion: This study has shown that the GNRI is a favorable predictor of muscle function in RTRs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2509-2514
Number of pages6
JournalTransplantation Proceedings
Volume50
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Nutrition Assessment
Geriatrics
Kidney
Muscles
Insulin Resistance
Body Weight
Transplant Recipients
Ideal Body Weight
Serum Albumin
C-Reactive Protein
Renal Dialysis
Albumins
Cross-Sectional Studies
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index, a Simplified Nutritional Screening Index, Is a Strong Predictor of Handgrip Strength in Renal Transplant Recipients. / Lin, I. H.; Wong, T. C.; Nien, S. W.; Wang, H. H.; Chiang, Y. J.; Yang, S. H.

In: Transplantation Proceedings, Vol. 50, No. 8, 01.10.2018, p. 2509-2514.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8f36dfaa6f74434bb8f98ed81843bd75,
title = "Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index, a Simplified Nutritional Screening Index, Is a Strong Predictor of Handgrip Strength in Renal Transplant Recipients",
abstract = "Background: The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a useful predictor of prognosis in older patients and those receiving hemodialysis. However, the predictive value of the GNRI in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) is unclear. In this study we investigated the correlation between the GNRI and muscle function, as indicated by handgrip strength (HGS). Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed on 42 RTRs (50{\%} women), with a mean age of 49.0 ± 10.8 years. The GNRI was derived from patients’ body weight and serum albumin level by using the following equation: GNRI = [14.89 × albumin (g/dL)] + [41.7 × (body weight/ideal body weight)]. HGS was evaluated in dominant arms; HGS measurement was repeated 3 times, and the highest value was used. Multivariable stepwise regression analyses were performed to obtain adjusted correlates, and the significance levels for entry and remaining were set at 0.1. Results: The mean values of the GNRI and HGS were 105.0 ± 5.4 and 29.0 ± 9.4, respectively. The GNRI was positively correlated with HGS (r = 0.36, P =.02). Linear and stepwise multivariable adjustment analyses revealed that the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and GNRI were independent determinants of HGS (β HOMA-IR = 0.53 and β GNRI = 0.43, adjusted R 2 = 0.45) after adjustment for age, sex, total muscle mass, and C-reactive protein level as covariates. Conclusion: This study has shown that the GNRI is a favorable predictor of muscle function in RTRs.",
author = "Lin, {I. H.} and Wong, {T. C.} and Nien, {S. W.} and Wang, {H. H.} and Chiang, {Y. J.} and Yang, {S. H.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.085",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "2509--2514",
journal = "Transplantation Proceedings",
issn = "0041-1345",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index, a Simplified Nutritional Screening Index, Is a Strong Predictor of Handgrip Strength in Renal Transplant Recipients

AU - Lin, I. H.

AU - Wong, T. C.

AU - Nien, S. W.

AU - Wang, H. H.

AU - Chiang, Y. J.

AU - Yang, S. H.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Background: The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a useful predictor of prognosis in older patients and those receiving hemodialysis. However, the predictive value of the GNRI in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) is unclear. In this study we investigated the correlation between the GNRI and muscle function, as indicated by handgrip strength (HGS). Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed on 42 RTRs (50% women), with a mean age of 49.0 ± 10.8 years. The GNRI was derived from patients’ body weight and serum albumin level by using the following equation: GNRI = [14.89 × albumin (g/dL)] + [41.7 × (body weight/ideal body weight)]. HGS was evaluated in dominant arms; HGS measurement was repeated 3 times, and the highest value was used. Multivariable stepwise regression analyses were performed to obtain adjusted correlates, and the significance levels for entry and remaining were set at 0.1. Results: The mean values of the GNRI and HGS were 105.0 ± 5.4 and 29.0 ± 9.4, respectively. The GNRI was positively correlated with HGS (r = 0.36, P =.02). Linear and stepwise multivariable adjustment analyses revealed that the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and GNRI were independent determinants of HGS (β HOMA-IR = 0.53 and β GNRI = 0.43, adjusted R 2 = 0.45) after adjustment for age, sex, total muscle mass, and C-reactive protein level as covariates. Conclusion: This study has shown that the GNRI is a favorable predictor of muscle function in RTRs.

AB - Background: The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a useful predictor of prognosis in older patients and those receiving hemodialysis. However, the predictive value of the GNRI in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) is unclear. In this study we investigated the correlation between the GNRI and muscle function, as indicated by handgrip strength (HGS). Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed on 42 RTRs (50% women), with a mean age of 49.0 ± 10.8 years. The GNRI was derived from patients’ body weight and serum albumin level by using the following equation: GNRI = [14.89 × albumin (g/dL)] + [41.7 × (body weight/ideal body weight)]. HGS was evaluated in dominant arms; HGS measurement was repeated 3 times, and the highest value was used. Multivariable stepwise regression analyses were performed to obtain adjusted correlates, and the significance levels for entry and remaining were set at 0.1. Results: The mean values of the GNRI and HGS were 105.0 ± 5.4 and 29.0 ± 9.4, respectively. The GNRI was positively correlated with HGS (r = 0.36, P =.02). Linear and stepwise multivariable adjustment analyses revealed that the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and GNRI were independent determinants of HGS (β HOMA-IR = 0.53 and β GNRI = 0.43, adjusted R 2 = 0.45) after adjustment for age, sex, total muscle mass, and C-reactive protein level as covariates. Conclusion: This study has shown that the GNRI is a favorable predictor of muscle function in RTRs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054460820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054460820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.085

DO - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.085

M3 - Article

C2 - 30316388

AN - SCOPUS:85054460820

VL - 50

SP - 2509

EP - 2514

JO - Transplantation Proceedings

JF - Transplantation Proceedings

SN - 0041-1345

IS - 8

ER -