Gauze versus solid skin barrier for tracheostomy care

A crossover randomized clinical trial

Wen Ling Chuang, Wen Pei Huang, Mei Hsing Chen, I. Ping Liu, Wen Liang Yu, Chi Chun Chin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare gauze and a solid pectin-based skin barrier to evaluate clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of care for tracheos-tomy wounds. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial with crossover design was conducted to compare gauze to a solid skin barrier for management of patients with tracheostomies. The main study outcomes were skin integrity, dressing change frequency, time required for dressing changes, product costs, and nurses' satisfaction. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: A convenience sample was recruited from 2 medical centers in Taiwan. Using permuted block randomization, patients undergoing tracheostomy were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups. One group received tracheostomy care with gauze for the first 6 days and a solid pectin-based skin barrier for the following 6 days. This regimen was reversed in the second group. RESULTS: Skin integrity was significantly better among patients managed with a solid skin barrier as compared to management with gauze (Z = - 2.75, P =.006). No significant differences in dressing change frequency, time required for dressing changes, or product costs between the 2 groups were found. Nurses' satisfaction was significantly higher for the solid skin barrier as compared to gauze (Z = - 2.31, P =.021, for group 1, and T = - 1.97, P =.048, for group 2). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a solid skin barrier for trache-ostomy care was associated with lower occurrences of impaired skin integrity and higher satisfaction among nurses when compared to gauze.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)573-579
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tracheostomy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Skin
Bandages
Nurses
Ostomy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Random Allocation
Taiwan
Cross-Over Studies
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Clinical trial
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Tracheostomy
  • Wound care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Advanced and Specialised Nursing
  • Medical–Surgical

Cite this

Gauze versus solid skin barrier for tracheostomy care : A crossover randomized clinical trial. / Chuang, Wen Ling; Huang, Wen Pei; Chen, Mei Hsing; Liu, I. Ping; Yu, Wen Liang; Chin, Chi Chun.

In: Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, Vol. 40, No. 6, 11.2013, p. 573-579.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chuang, Wen Ling ; Huang, Wen Pei ; Chen, Mei Hsing ; Liu, I. Ping ; Yu, Wen Liang ; Chin, Chi Chun. / Gauze versus solid skin barrier for tracheostomy care : A crossover randomized clinical trial. In: Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing. 2013 ; Vol. 40, No. 6. pp. 573-579.
@article{7f195546e2ac44258842decd90b52660,
title = "Gauze versus solid skin barrier for tracheostomy care: A crossover randomized clinical trial",
abstract = "PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare gauze and a solid pectin-based skin barrier to evaluate clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of care for tracheos-tomy wounds. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial with crossover design was conducted to compare gauze to a solid skin barrier for management of patients with tracheostomies. The main study outcomes were skin integrity, dressing change frequency, time required for dressing changes, product costs, and nurses' satisfaction. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: A convenience sample was recruited from 2 medical centers in Taiwan. Using permuted block randomization, patients undergoing tracheostomy were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups. One group received tracheostomy care with gauze for the first 6 days and a solid pectin-based skin barrier for the following 6 days. This regimen was reversed in the second group. RESULTS: Skin integrity was significantly better among patients managed with a solid skin barrier as compared to management with gauze (Z = - 2.75, P =.006). No significant differences in dressing change frequency, time required for dressing changes, or product costs between the 2 groups were found. Nurses' satisfaction was significantly higher for the solid skin barrier as compared to gauze (Z = - 2.31, P =.021, for group 1, and T = - 1.97, P =.048, for group 2). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a solid skin barrier for trache-ostomy care was associated with lower occurrences of impaired skin integrity and higher satisfaction among nurses when compared to gauze.",
keywords = "Clinical trial, Cost-effectiveness, Tracheostomy, Wound care",
author = "Chuang, {Wen Ling} and Huang, {Wen Pei} and Chen, {Mei Hsing} and Liu, {I. Ping} and Yu, {Wen Liang} and Chin, {Chi Chun}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/01.WON.0000436431.01159.9f",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "573--579",
journal = "Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing",
issn = "1071-5754",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gauze versus solid skin barrier for tracheostomy care

T2 - A crossover randomized clinical trial

AU - Chuang, Wen Ling

AU - Huang, Wen Pei

AU - Chen, Mei Hsing

AU - Liu, I. Ping

AU - Yu, Wen Liang

AU - Chin, Chi Chun

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare gauze and a solid pectin-based skin barrier to evaluate clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of care for tracheos-tomy wounds. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial with crossover design was conducted to compare gauze to a solid skin barrier for management of patients with tracheostomies. The main study outcomes were skin integrity, dressing change frequency, time required for dressing changes, product costs, and nurses' satisfaction. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: A convenience sample was recruited from 2 medical centers in Taiwan. Using permuted block randomization, patients undergoing tracheostomy were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups. One group received tracheostomy care with gauze for the first 6 days and a solid pectin-based skin barrier for the following 6 days. This regimen was reversed in the second group. RESULTS: Skin integrity was significantly better among patients managed with a solid skin barrier as compared to management with gauze (Z = - 2.75, P =.006). No significant differences in dressing change frequency, time required for dressing changes, or product costs between the 2 groups were found. Nurses' satisfaction was significantly higher for the solid skin barrier as compared to gauze (Z = - 2.31, P =.021, for group 1, and T = - 1.97, P =.048, for group 2). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a solid skin barrier for trache-ostomy care was associated with lower occurrences of impaired skin integrity and higher satisfaction among nurses when compared to gauze.

AB - PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare gauze and a solid pectin-based skin barrier to evaluate clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of care for tracheos-tomy wounds. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial with crossover design was conducted to compare gauze to a solid skin barrier for management of patients with tracheostomies. The main study outcomes were skin integrity, dressing change frequency, time required for dressing changes, product costs, and nurses' satisfaction. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: A convenience sample was recruited from 2 medical centers in Taiwan. Using permuted block randomization, patients undergoing tracheostomy were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups. One group received tracheostomy care with gauze for the first 6 days and a solid pectin-based skin barrier for the following 6 days. This regimen was reversed in the second group. RESULTS: Skin integrity was significantly better among patients managed with a solid skin barrier as compared to management with gauze (Z = - 2.75, P =.006). No significant differences in dressing change frequency, time required for dressing changes, or product costs between the 2 groups were found. Nurses' satisfaction was significantly higher for the solid skin barrier as compared to gauze (Z = - 2.31, P =.021, for group 1, and T = - 1.97, P =.048, for group 2). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a solid skin barrier for trache-ostomy care was associated with lower occurrences of impaired skin integrity and higher satisfaction among nurses when compared to gauze.

KW - Clinical trial

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Tracheostomy

KW - Wound care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887986623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887986623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.WON.0000436431.01159.9f

DO - 10.1097/01.WON.0000436431.01159.9f

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 573

EP - 579

JO - Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

JF - Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

SN - 1071-5754

IS - 6

ER -