Functioning and disability analysis of patients with traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury by using the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0

Chia Ying Kuo, Tsan Hon Liou, Kwang Hwa Chang, Wen Chou Chi, Reuben Escorpizo, Chia Feng Yen, Hua Fang Liao, Hung Yi Chiou, Wen Ta Chiu, Jo Ting Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and spinal cord injuries (SCI) patients’ function and disability by using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0); and to clarify the factors that contribute to disability. We analyzed data available between September 2012 and August 2013 from Taiwan’s national disability registry which is based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. Of the 2664 cases selected for the study, 1316 pertained to TBI and 1348 to SCI. A larger percentage of patients with TBI compared with those with SCI exhibited poor cognition, self-care, relationships, life activities, and participation in society (all p <0.001). Age, sex, injury type, socioeconomic status, place of residence, and severity of impairment were determined as factors that independently contribute to disability (all p <0.05). The WHODAS 2.0 is a generic assessment instrument which is appropriate for assessing the complex and multifaceted disability associated with TBI and SCI. Further studies are needed to validate the WHODAS 2.0 for TBI and SCI from a multidisciplinary perspective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4116-4127
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 14 2015

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Injuries
Appointments and Schedules
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
Self Care
Social Class
Cognition
Registries
Traumatic Brain Injury
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Disability
  • Disability
  • Health (ICF)
  • International classification of functioning
  • Spinal cord injury (SCI)
  • Traumatic brain injury (TBI)
  • World health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

@article{5729650f28f04d6891260dad2b5e2b7c,
title = "Functioning and disability analysis of patients with traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury by using the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0",
abstract = "The purpose of this study is to compare traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and spinal cord injuries (SCI) patients’ function and disability by using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0); and to clarify the factors that contribute to disability. We analyzed data available between September 2012 and August 2013 from Taiwan’s national disability registry which is based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. Of the 2664 cases selected for the study, 1316 pertained to TBI and 1348 to SCI. A larger percentage of patients with TBI compared with those with SCI exhibited poor cognition, self-care, relationships, life activities, and participation in society (all p <0.001). Age, sex, injury type, socioeconomic status, place of residence, and severity of impairment were determined as factors that independently contribute to disability (all p <0.05). The WHODAS 2.0 is a generic assessment instrument which is appropriate for assessing the complex and multifaceted disability associated with TBI and SCI. Further studies are needed to validate the WHODAS 2.0 for TBI and SCI from a multidisciplinary perspective.",
keywords = "Disability, Disability, Health (ICF), International classification of functioning, Spinal cord injury (SCI), Traumatic brain injury (TBI), World health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0)",
author = "Kuo, {Chia Ying} and Liou, {Tsan Hon} and Chang, {Kwang Hwa} and Chi, {Wen Chou} and Reuben Escorpizo and Yen, {Chia Feng} and Liao, {Hua Fang} and Chiou, {Hung Yi} and Chiu, {Wen Ta} and Tsai, {Jo Ting}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "14",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph120404116",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "4116--4127",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
issn = "1661-7827",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functioning and disability analysis of patients with traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury by using the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0

AU - Kuo, Chia Ying

AU - Liou, Tsan Hon

AU - Chang, Kwang Hwa

AU - Chi, Wen Chou

AU - Escorpizo, Reuben

AU - Yen, Chia Feng

AU - Liao, Hua Fang

AU - Chiou, Hung Yi

AU - Chiu, Wen Ta

AU - Tsai, Jo Ting

PY - 2015/4/14

Y1 - 2015/4/14

N2 - The purpose of this study is to compare traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and spinal cord injuries (SCI) patients’ function and disability by using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0); and to clarify the factors that contribute to disability. We analyzed data available between September 2012 and August 2013 from Taiwan’s national disability registry which is based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. Of the 2664 cases selected for the study, 1316 pertained to TBI and 1348 to SCI. A larger percentage of patients with TBI compared with those with SCI exhibited poor cognition, self-care, relationships, life activities, and participation in society (all p <0.001). Age, sex, injury type, socioeconomic status, place of residence, and severity of impairment were determined as factors that independently contribute to disability (all p <0.05). The WHODAS 2.0 is a generic assessment instrument which is appropriate for assessing the complex and multifaceted disability associated with TBI and SCI. Further studies are needed to validate the WHODAS 2.0 for TBI and SCI from a multidisciplinary perspective.

AB - The purpose of this study is to compare traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and spinal cord injuries (SCI) patients’ function and disability by using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0); and to clarify the factors that contribute to disability. We analyzed data available between September 2012 and August 2013 from Taiwan’s national disability registry which is based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. Of the 2664 cases selected for the study, 1316 pertained to TBI and 1348 to SCI. A larger percentage of patients with TBI compared with those with SCI exhibited poor cognition, self-care, relationships, life activities, and participation in society (all p <0.001). Age, sex, injury type, socioeconomic status, place of residence, and severity of impairment were determined as factors that independently contribute to disability (all p <0.05). The WHODAS 2.0 is a generic assessment instrument which is appropriate for assessing the complex and multifaceted disability associated with TBI and SCI. Further studies are needed to validate the WHODAS 2.0 for TBI and SCI from a multidisciplinary perspective.

KW - Disability

KW - Disability

KW - Health (ICF)

KW - International classification of functioning

KW - Spinal cord injury (SCI)

KW - Traumatic brain injury (TBI)

KW - World health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927950483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927950483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph120404116

DO - 10.3390/ijerph120404116

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 4116

EP - 4127

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1661-7827

IS - 4

ER -