Findings at follow-up endoscopies in subjects with suspected colorectal abnormalities

Effects of baseline findings and time to follow-up

Fay H. Cafferty, Jau Min Wong, Amy Ming Fang Yen, Stephen W. Duffy, Wendy S. Atkin, Tony Hsiu Hsi Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose:: Guidelines for colonoscopic surveillance after the removal of colorectal polyps already exist in the United Kingdom and United States. However, there is a continuing need to build up an evidence base on the likely effect of different follow-up policies for specific current findings. This article reports on the colonoscopic surveillance of a cohort of patients in Taiwan. The risk of various outcomes at the second examination is assessed according to findings at the first examination and the interval between examinations. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Data from baseline and follow-up examinations for 2,287 individuals attending the National Taiwan University Hospital were collected retrospectively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the following 4 outcomes: any positive findings; multiple (ĝ‰¥3) polyps; large (ĝ‰¥10 mm) polyp(s); or villous adenoma(s) or cancer. The effect of the interval between examinations was assessed in all models. RESULTS:: Older age was an independent risk factor for all outcomes. The number of baseline polyps was a significant risk factor for both positive results and multiple polyps, more severe baseline histology was a risk factor for large polyps and villous adenomas/cancer, and larger baseline polyps were a risk factor for large polyps at follow-up. Interval time was only an independent risk factor for villous adenomas/cancer, which tended to be found at shorter follow-up times. The total number of abnormalities found at follow-up was significantly related to the number of follow-up examinations but not to the total follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS:: Results suggest that, with the possible exception of subjects with villous adenomas at baseline, most reexaminations can safely be delayed for ĝ‰¥5 years. In the majority of cases staff at the hospital were correctly identifying those subjects at particularly high risk and assigning shorter follow-up intervals accordingly. Models indicate that many of the findings seen at follow-up were due to missed baseline findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-270
Number of pages8
JournalCancer Journal
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Polyps
Endoscopy
Villous Adenoma
Taiwan
Neoplasms
Histology
Logistic Models
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Adenomas
  • Colonoscopy
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Colorectal neoplasms
  • Polyps
  • Surveillance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Findings at follow-up endoscopies in subjects with suspected colorectal abnormalities : Effects of baseline findings and time to follow-up. / Cafferty, Fay H.; Wong, Jau Min; Yen, Amy Ming Fang; Duffy, Stephen W.; Atkin, Wendy S.; Chen, Tony Hsiu Hsi.

In: Cancer Journal, Vol. 13, No. 4, 07.2007, p. 263-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cafferty, Fay H. ; Wong, Jau Min ; Yen, Amy Ming Fang ; Duffy, Stephen W. ; Atkin, Wendy S. ; Chen, Tony Hsiu Hsi. / Findings at follow-up endoscopies in subjects with suspected colorectal abnormalities : Effects of baseline findings and time to follow-up. In: Cancer Journal. 2007 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 263-270.
@article{d8c3077907364c9ca8fcd3b79476b669,
title = "Findings at follow-up endoscopies in subjects with suspected colorectal abnormalities: Effects of baseline findings and time to follow-up",
abstract = "Purpose:: Guidelines for colonoscopic surveillance after the removal of colorectal polyps already exist in the United Kingdom and United States. However, there is a continuing need to build up an evidence base on the likely effect of different follow-up policies for specific current findings. This article reports on the colonoscopic surveillance of a cohort of patients in Taiwan. The risk of various outcomes at the second examination is assessed according to findings at the first examination and the interval between examinations. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Data from baseline and follow-up examinations for 2,287 individuals attending the National Taiwan University Hospital were collected retrospectively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the following 4 outcomes: any positive findings; multiple (ĝ‰¥3) polyps; large (ĝ‰¥10 mm) polyp(s); or villous adenoma(s) or cancer. The effect of the interval between examinations was assessed in all models. RESULTS:: Older age was an independent risk factor for all outcomes. The number of baseline polyps was a significant risk factor for both positive results and multiple polyps, more severe baseline histology was a risk factor for large polyps and villous adenomas/cancer, and larger baseline polyps were a risk factor for large polyps at follow-up. Interval time was only an independent risk factor for villous adenomas/cancer, which tended to be found at shorter follow-up times. The total number of abnormalities found at follow-up was significantly related to the number of follow-up examinations but not to the total follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS:: Results suggest that, with the possible exception of subjects with villous adenomas at baseline, most reexaminations can safely be delayed for ĝ‰¥5 years. In the majority of cases staff at the hospital were correctly identifying those subjects at particularly high risk and assigning shorter follow-up intervals accordingly. Models indicate that many of the findings seen at follow-up were due to missed baseline findings.",
keywords = "Adenomas, Colonoscopy, Colorectal cancer, Colorectal neoplasms, Polyps, Surveillance",
author = "Cafferty, {Fay H.} and Wong, {Jau Min} and Yen, {Amy Ming Fang} and Duffy, {Stephen W.} and Atkin, {Wendy S.} and Chen, {Tony Hsiu Hsi}",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/PPO.0b013e318046ebf1",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "263--270",
journal = "Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)",
issn = "1528-9117",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Findings at follow-up endoscopies in subjects with suspected colorectal abnormalities

T2 - Effects of baseline findings and time to follow-up

AU - Cafferty, Fay H.

AU - Wong, Jau Min

AU - Yen, Amy Ming Fang

AU - Duffy, Stephen W.

AU - Atkin, Wendy S.

AU - Chen, Tony Hsiu Hsi

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Purpose:: Guidelines for colonoscopic surveillance after the removal of colorectal polyps already exist in the United Kingdom and United States. However, there is a continuing need to build up an evidence base on the likely effect of different follow-up policies for specific current findings. This article reports on the colonoscopic surveillance of a cohort of patients in Taiwan. The risk of various outcomes at the second examination is assessed according to findings at the first examination and the interval between examinations. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Data from baseline and follow-up examinations for 2,287 individuals attending the National Taiwan University Hospital were collected retrospectively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the following 4 outcomes: any positive findings; multiple (ĝ‰¥3) polyps; large (ĝ‰¥10 mm) polyp(s); or villous adenoma(s) or cancer. The effect of the interval between examinations was assessed in all models. RESULTS:: Older age was an independent risk factor for all outcomes. The number of baseline polyps was a significant risk factor for both positive results and multiple polyps, more severe baseline histology was a risk factor for large polyps and villous adenomas/cancer, and larger baseline polyps were a risk factor for large polyps at follow-up. Interval time was only an independent risk factor for villous adenomas/cancer, which tended to be found at shorter follow-up times. The total number of abnormalities found at follow-up was significantly related to the number of follow-up examinations but not to the total follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS:: Results suggest that, with the possible exception of subjects with villous adenomas at baseline, most reexaminations can safely be delayed for ĝ‰¥5 years. In the majority of cases staff at the hospital were correctly identifying those subjects at particularly high risk and assigning shorter follow-up intervals accordingly. Models indicate that many of the findings seen at follow-up were due to missed baseline findings.

AB - Purpose:: Guidelines for colonoscopic surveillance after the removal of colorectal polyps already exist in the United Kingdom and United States. However, there is a continuing need to build up an evidence base on the likely effect of different follow-up policies for specific current findings. This article reports on the colonoscopic surveillance of a cohort of patients in Taiwan. The risk of various outcomes at the second examination is assessed according to findings at the first examination and the interval between examinations. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Data from baseline and follow-up examinations for 2,287 individuals attending the National Taiwan University Hospital were collected retrospectively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the following 4 outcomes: any positive findings; multiple (ĝ‰¥3) polyps; large (ĝ‰¥10 mm) polyp(s); or villous adenoma(s) or cancer. The effect of the interval between examinations was assessed in all models. RESULTS:: Older age was an independent risk factor for all outcomes. The number of baseline polyps was a significant risk factor for both positive results and multiple polyps, more severe baseline histology was a risk factor for large polyps and villous adenomas/cancer, and larger baseline polyps were a risk factor for large polyps at follow-up. Interval time was only an independent risk factor for villous adenomas/cancer, which tended to be found at shorter follow-up times. The total number of abnormalities found at follow-up was significantly related to the number of follow-up examinations but not to the total follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS:: Results suggest that, with the possible exception of subjects with villous adenomas at baseline, most reexaminations can safely be delayed for ĝ‰¥5 years. In the majority of cases staff at the hospital were correctly identifying those subjects at particularly high risk and assigning shorter follow-up intervals accordingly. Models indicate that many of the findings seen at follow-up were due to missed baseline findings.

KW - Adenomas

KW - Colonoscopy

KW - Colorectal cancer

KW - Colorectal neoplasms

KW - Polyps

KW - Surveillance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35748957212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35748957212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PPO.0b013e318046ebf1

DO - 10.1097/PPO.0b013e318046ebf1

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 263

EP - 270

JO - Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)

JF - Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)

SN - 1528-9117

IS - 4

ER -