Experimental allograft in spinal fusion in dogs.

Y. H. Tsuang, R. S. Yang, P. Q. Chen, T. K. Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fifty-six dogs were used for the comparison of the allogenous and autogenous bone graft in anterior interbody and posterior spinal fusion. Excluding 7 cases with wound infections, the end results of the allograft and autograft in anterior interbody and posterior spinal fusion were nearly the same, provided that the rules of technique for the spinal fusion were strictly followed, especially in the allograft group. Grossly, there was a reduction tendency in the fusion mass of the allograft group that was proven by roentgenographic examination of the harvested spinal block. Histologically, there was no evidence of regeneration of the allograft that can be readily detected in the autograft. In the allograft group, osteogenesis can only be seen in the recipient sites, the allograft transplants become sequestrated and resorbed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)989-994
Number of pages6
JournalTaiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Volume88
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spinal Fusion
Allografts
Dogs
Autografts
Transplants
Wound Infection
Osteogenesis
Regeneration
Bone and Bones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Experimental allograft in spinal fusion in dogs. / Tsuang, Y. H.; Yang, R. S.; Chen, P. Q.; Liu, T. K.

In: Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, Vol. 88, No. 10, 10.1989, p. 989-994.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsuang, Y. H. ; Yang, R. S. ; Chen, P. Q. ; Liu, T. K. / Experimental allograft in spinal fusion in dogs. In: Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 1989 ; Vol. 88, No. 10. pp. 989-994.
@article{d84d1729fa944bacbc4c66d01c5a961e,
title = "Experimental allograft in spinal fusion in dogs.",
abstract = "Fifty-six dogs were used for the comparison of the allogenous and autogenous bone graft in anterior interbody and posterior spinal fusion. Excluding 7 cases with wound infections, the end results of the allograft and autograft in anterior interbody and posterior spinal fusion were nearly the same, provided that the rules of technique for the spinal fusion were strictly followed, especially in the allograft group. Grossly, there was a reduction tendency in the fusion mass of the allograft group that was proven by roentgenographic examination of the harvested spinal block. Histologically, there was no evidence of regeneration of the allograft that can be readily detected in the autograft. In the allograft group, osteogenesis can only be seen in the recipient sites, the allograft transplants become sequestrated and resorbed.",
author = "Tsuang, {Y. H.} and Yang, {R. S.} and Chen, {P. Q.} and Liu, {T. K.}",
year = "1989",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "989--994",
journal = "Journal of the Formosan Medical Association",
issn = "0929-6646",
publisher = "Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experimental allograft in spinal fusion in dogs.

AU - Tsuang, Y. H.

AU - Yang, R. S.

AU - Chen, P. Q.

AU - Liu, T. K.

PY - 1989/10

Y1 - 1989/10

N2 - Fifty-six dogs were used for the comparison of the allogenous and autogenous bone graft in anterior interbody and posterior spinal fusion. Excluding 7 cases with wound infections, the end results of the allograft and autograft in anterior interbody and posterior spinal fusion were nearly the same, provided that the rules of technique for the spinal fusion were strictly followed, especially in the allograft group. Grossly, there was a reduction tendency in the fusion mass of the allograft group that was proven by roentgenographic examination of the harvested spinal block. Histologically, there was no evidence of regeneration of the allograft that can be readily detected in the autograft. In the allograft group, osteogenesis can only be seen in the recipient sites, the allograft transplants become sequestrated and resorbed.

AB - Fifty-six dogs were used for the comparison of the allogenous and autogenous bone graft in anterior interbody and posterior spinal fusion. Excluding 7 cases with wound infections, the end results of the allograft and autograft in anterior interbody and posterior spinal fusion were nearly the same, provided that the rules of technique for the spinal fusion were strictly followed, especially in the allograft group. Grossly, there was a reduction tendency in the fusion mass of the allograft group that was proven by roentgenographic examination of the harvested spinal block. Histologically, there was no evidence of regeneration of the allograft that can be readily detected in the autograft. In the allograft group, osteogenesis can only be seen in the recipient sites, the allograft transplants become sequestrated and resorbed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024744216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024744216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2634734

AN - SCOPUS:0024744216

VL - 88

SP - 989

EP - 994

JO - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association

JF - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association

SN - 0929-6646

IS - 10

ER -