Evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: Current practice in Taiwan

C. F. Chong, T. L. Wang, H. Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To gain an overview of the current practice of different major institutions in Taiwan in the evaluation of abdominal injuries. A further comparison was made between general surgeons and emergency physicians in this aspect. Method: A telephone survey was conducted of all emergency departments of 58 major institutions (14 medical centres, 44 district hospitals) that are capable of providing definitive care for trauma victims in Taiwan in June 2002. Respondents were asked to select the diagnostic modality of choice in the evaluation of a haemodynamically abnormal blunt trauma victim with suspected intra-abdominal injuries. In the same study period, this particular telephone scenario was also used to survey 109 individual doctors (45 emergency physicians, 64 general surgeons). Results: Most respondents preferred ultrasound (also known as focused assessment with sonography for trauma or "FAST") instead of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) because DPL is invasive and most doctors in Taiwan have limited experience in performing DPL or interpreting the results. Conclusions: It seems reasonable to devote greater resources for emergency departments to incorporate a FAST based algorithm into their initial management of trauma victims, and to improve training in its use. It is also suggested that future ATLS teaching in Taiwan should include didactic material on FAST.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-115
Number of pages3
JournalEmergency medicine journal : EMJ
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Peritoneal Lavage
Taiwan
Abdominal Injuries
Wounds and Injuries
Telephone
Hospital Emergency Service
Emergencies
Physicians
District Hospitals
Ultrasonography
Teaching
Surveys and Questionnaires
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Nursing(all)
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma : Current practice in Taiwan. / Chong, C. F.; Wang, T. L.; Chang, H.

In: Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, Vol. 22, No. 2, 02.2005, p. 113-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chong, C. F. ; Wang, T. L. ; Chang, H. / Evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma : Current practice in Taiwan. In: Emergency medicine journal : EMJ. 2005 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 113-115.
@article{da807637cd27441289c72bb45db661a1,
title = "Evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: Current practice in Taiwan",
abstract = "Objective: To gain an overview of the current practice of different major institutions in Taiwan in the evaluation of abdominal injuries. A further comparison was made between general surgeons and emergency physicians in this aspect. Method: A telephone survey was conducted of all emergency departments of 58 major institutions (14 medical centres, 44 district hospitals) that are capable of providing definitive care for trauma victims in Taiwan in June 2002. Respondents were asked to select the diagnostic modality of choice in the evaluation of a haemodynamically abnormal blunt trauma victim with suspected intra-abdominal injuries. In the same study period, this particular telephone scenario was also used to survey 109 individual doctors (45 emergency physicians, 64 general surgeons). Results: Most respondents preferred ultrasound (also known as focused assessment with sonography for trauma or {"}FAST{"}) instead of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) because DPL is invasive and most doctors in Taiwan have limited experience in performing DPL or interpreting the results. Conclusions: It seems reasonable to devote greater resources for emergency departments to incorporate a FAST based algorithm into their initial management of trauma victims, and to improve training in its use. It is also suggested that future ATLS teaching in Taiwan should include didactic material on FAST.",
author = "Chong, {C. F.} and Wang, {T. L.} and H. Chang",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1136/emj.2003.007328",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "113--115",
journal = "Emergency Medicine Journal",
issn = "1472-0205",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma

T2 - Current practice in Taiwan

AU - Chong, C. F.

AU - Wang, T. L.

AU - Chang, H.

PY - 2005/2

Y1 - 2005/2

N2 - Objective: To gain an overview of the current practice of different major institutions in Taiwan in the evaluation of abdominal injuries. A further comparison was made between general surgeons and emergency physicians in this aspect. Method: A telephone survey was conducted of all emergency departments of 58 major institutions (14 medical centres, 44 district hospitals) that are capable of providing definitive care for trauma victims in Taiwan in June 2002. Respondents were asked to select the diagnostic modality of choice in the evaluation of a haemodynamically abnormal blunt trauma victim with suspected intra-abdominal injuries. In the same study period, this particular telephone scenario was also used to survey 109 individual doctors (45 emergency physicians, 64 general surgeons). Results: Most respondents preferred ultrasound (also known as focused assessment with sonography for trauma or "FAST") instead of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) because DPL is invasive and most doctors in Taiwan have limited experience in performing DPL or interpreting the results. Conclusions: It seems reasonable to devote greater resources for emergency departments to incorporate a FAST based algorithm into their initial management of trauma victims, and to improve training in its use. It is also suggested that future ATLS teaching in Taiwan should include didactic material on FAST.

AB - Objective: To gain an overview of the current practice of different major institutions in Taiwan in the evaluation of abdominal injuries. A further comparison was made between general surgeons and emergency physicians in this aspect. Method: A telephone survey was conducted of all emergency departments of 58 major institutions (14 medical centres, 44 district hospitals) that are capable of providing definitive care for trauma victims in Taiwan in June 2002. Respondents were asked to select the diagnostic modality of choice in the evaluation of a haemodynamically abnormal blunt trauma victim with suspected intra-abdominal injuries. In the same study period, this particular telephone scenario was also used to survey 109 individual doctors (45 emergency physicians, 64 general surgeons). Results: Most respondents preferred ultrasound (also known as focused assessment with sonography for trauma or "FAST") instead of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) because DPL is invasive and most doctors in Taiwan have limited experience in performing DPL or interpreting the results. Conclusions: It seems reasonable to devote greater resources for emergency departments to incorporate a FAST based algorithm into their initial management of trauma victims, and to improve training in its use. It is also suggested that future ATLS teaching in Taiwan should include didactic material on FAST.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13844256653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13844256653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/emj.2003.007328

DO - 10.1136/emj.2003.007328

M3 - Article

C2 - 15662061

AN - SCOPUS:13844256653

VL - 22

SP - 113

EP - 115

JO - Emergency Medicine Journal

JF - Emergency Medicine Journal

SN - 1472-0205

IS - 2

ER -