Ethical attitudes on human cloning among professionals in Taiwan and the policy implications for regulation

Che Ming Yang, Chun Chih Chung, Meei Shiow Lu, Chiou Fen Lin, Jiun Shyan Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This research focused on understanding the attitudes toward human cloning in Taiwan among professionals in healthcare, law, and religion. Design: The study was conducted utilizing a structured questionnaire. Participants: 220 healthcare professionals from two regional hospitals located in Taipei, 351 religious professionals in the northern Taiwan and 711 legal professionals were selected by to receive questionnaires. The valid response rate is 42.1% Main measurements: The questions were generated by an expert panel and represented major arguments in the human cloning debate. There were a total of six Likert scaled questions in the questionnaire. The responses were coded from 1 to 5 with 1 representing strong opposition to human cloning, 3 representing a neutral attitude; and 5 representing a strong favorable attitude toward human cloning. Results: Healthcare professionals had the highest overall average score of 2.14 and the religious professionals had the lowest average at 1.58. All three categories of respondents' attitude toward cloning ranged from mild opposition to strong opposition to human cloning. The religious professionals were more strongly opposed to cloning. Age, education, and religion significantly influenced attitudes toward cloning. Professionals between fifty-one and sixty years old, those with less education, and Roman Catholic professionals were more strongly opposed to cloning. Conclusions: Religious professionals were more strongly opposed to human cloning than professionals in healthcare or law. Younger professionals as an age group demonstrated less opposition to human cloning. Regulation of human cloning will be influenced by professionals in healthcare, law, and religion, and the regulatory environment chosen now will play a pivotal role in influencing the acceptance of human cloning in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-44
Number of pages10
JournalIssues in Law and Medicine
Volume21
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Taiwan
Organism Cloning
regulation
opposition
Religion
Law
questionnaire
Delivery of Health Care
age group
education
acceptance
expert
Education
Age Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Ethical attitudes on human cloning among professionals in Taiwan and the policy implications for regulation. / Yang, Che Ming; Chung, Chun Chih; Lu, Meei Shiow; Lin, Chiou Fen; Chen, Jiun Shyan.

In: Issues in Law and Medicine, Vol. 21, No. 1, 06.2005, p. 35-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a4592f72c6ae497c9323830c3908917f,
title = "Ethical attitudes on human cloning among professionals in Taiwan and the policy implications for regulation",
abstract = "This research focused on understanding the attitudes toward human cloning in Taiwan among professionals in healthcare, law, and religion. Design: The study was conducted utilizing a structured questionnaire. Participants: 220 healthcare professionals from two regional hospitals located in Taipei, 351 religious professionals in the northern Taiwan and 711 legal professionals were selected by to receive questionnaires. The valid response rate is 42.1{\%} Main measurements: The questions were generated by an expert panel and represented major arguments in the human cloning debate. There were a total of six Likert scaled questions in the questionnaire. The responses were coded from 1 to 5 with 1 representing strong opposition to human cloning, 3 representing a neutral attitude; and 5 representing a strong favorable attitude toward human cloning. Results: Healthcare professionals had the highest overall average score of 2.14 and the religious professionals had the lowest average at 1.58. All three categories of respondents' attitude toward cloning ranged from mild opposition to strong opposition to human cloning. The religious professionals were more strongly opposed to cloning. Age, education, and religion significantly influenced attitudes toward cloning. Professionals between fifty-one and sixty years old, those with less education, and Roman Catholic professionals were more strongly opposed to cloning. Conclusions: Religious professionals were more strongly opposed to human cloning than professionals in healthcare or law. Younger professionals as an age group demonstrated less opposition to human cloning. Regulation of human cloning will be influenced by professionals in healthcare, law, and religion, and the regulatory environment chosen now will play a pivotal role in influencing the acceptance of human cloning in the future.",
author = "Yang, {Che Ming} and Chung, {Chun Chih} and Lu, {Meei Shiow} and Lin, {Chiou Fen} and Chen, {Jiun Shyan}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "35--44",
journal = "Issues in Law and Medicine",
issn = "8756-8160",
publisher = "National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled Inc",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical attitudes on human cloning among professionals in Taiwan and the policy implications for regulation

AU - Yang, Che Ming

AU - Chung, Chun Chih

AU - Lu, Meei Shiow

AU - Lin, Chiou Fen

AU - Chen, Jiun Shyan

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - This research focused on understanding the attitudes toward human cloning in Taiwan among professionals in healthcare, law, and religion. Design: The study was conducted utilizing a structured questionnaire. Participants: 220 healthcare professionals from two regional hospitals located in Taipei, 351 religious professionals in the northern Taiwan and 711 legal professionals were selected by to receive questionnaires. The valid response rate is 42.1% Main measurements: The questions were generated by an expert panel and represented major arguments in the human cloning debate. There were a total of six Likert scaled questions in the questionnaire. The responses were coded from 1 to 5 with 1 representing strong opposition to human cloning, 3 representing a neutral attitude; and 5 representing a strong favorable attitude toward human cloning. Results: Healthcare professionals had the highest overall average score of 2.14 and the religious professionals had the lowest average at 1.58. All three categories of respondents' attitude toward cloning ranged from mild opposition to strong opposition to human cloning. The religious professionals were more strongly opposed to cloning. Age, education, and religion significantly influenced attitudes toward cloning. Professionals between fifty-one and sixty years old, those with less education, and Roman Catholic professionals were more strongly opposed to cloning. Conclusions: Religious professionals were more strongly opposed to human cloning than professionals in healthcare or law. Younger professionals as an age group demonstrated less opposition to human cloning. Regulation of human cloning will be influenced by professionals in healthcare, law, and religion, and the regulatory environment chosen now will play a pivotal role in influencing the acceptance of human cloning in the future.

AB - This research focused on understanding the attitudes toward human cloning in Taiwan among professionals in healthcare, law, and religion. Design: The study was conducted utilizing a structured questionnaire. Participants: 220 healthcare professionals from two regional hospitals located in Taipei, 351 religious professionals in the northern Taiwan and 711 legal professionals were selected by to receive questionnaires. The valid response rate is 42.1% Main measurements: The questions were generated by an expert panel and represented major arguments in the human cloning debate. There were a total of six Likert scaled questions in the questionnaire. The responses were coded from 1 to 5 with 1 representing strong opposition to human cloning, 3 representing a neutral attitude; and 5 representing a strong favorable attitude toward human cloning. Results: Healthcare professionals had the highest overall average score of 2.14 and the religious professionals had the lowest average at 1.58. All three categories of respondents' attitude toward cloning ranged from mild opposition to strong opposition to human cloning. The religious professionals were more strongly opposed to cloning. Age, education, and religion significantly influenced attitudes toward cloning. Professionals between fifty-one and sixty years old, those with less education, and Roman Catholic professionals were more strongly opposed to cloning. Conclusions: Religious professionals were more strongly opposed to human cloning than professionals in healthcare or law. Younger professionals as an age group demonstrated less opposition to human cloning. Regulation of human cloning will be influenced by professionals in healthcare, law, and religion, and the regulatory environment chosen now will play a pivotal role in influencing the acceptance of human cloning in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23244437564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23244437564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 35

EP - 44

JO - Issues in Law and Medicine

JF - Issues in Law and Medicine

SN - 8756-8160

IS - 1

ER -