Epidemiology of Emergency Department Sepsis: A National Cohort Study Between 2001 and 2012

Chin Wei Yu, Shy Shin Chang, Chih Cheng Lai, Jiunn Yih Wu, Debra W. Yen, Meng Tse Gabriel Lee, Chien Chun Yeh, Jui Yuan Chung, Yu Jiun Lin, Chien Chang Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the incidence trend of sepsis over 11 years and compared mortality outcomes among Taiwanese patients with sepsis admitted from emergency department (ED) and non-ED routes. We used a nationwide health insurance database from Taiwan, which comprise of 23 million beneficiaries. Patients with sepsis were identified by ICD-9 CM codes for infection and organ dysfunction from 2001 to 2012. We performed propensity score matching and compared mortality rates between ED-admitted and non ED-admitted patients.During the 11-year study period, we identified 1,256,684 patients with sepsis. 493,397 (29.3%) were admitted through the ED, and 763,287 (70.7%) were admitted directly to the floor. For patients with sepsis, mortality in ED-admitted patients decreased from 27.2% in 2002 to 21.1% in 2012 while that in non-ED admitted patients decreased from 35.3% in 2002 to 30.7% in 2012. Although patients with sepsis admitted through the ED had a higher incidence of organ dysfunction than patients who were directly admitted, they had more favorable outcomes in mortality, length of intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay. After propensity score matching, ED-admitted patients had a 7% lower risk of 90-day mortality (HR, 0.93, 95% CI, 0.89-0.97) compared with directly admitted patients. During the study period, mortality declined faster among ED admitted sepsis patients than directly admitted sepsis patients. Results of this study should be interpreted in light of limitations. Like other administrative database studies, treatment details are not available. Further clinical studies evaluating the treatment and outcome difference between ED and non-ED admitted sepsis patients are warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)619-624
Number of pages6
JournalShock (Augusta, Ga.)
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Sepsis
Epidemiology
Cohort Studies
Mortality
Propensity Score
Databases
Incidence
International Classification of Diseases
Health Insurance
Taiwan
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Epidemiology of Emergency Department Sepsis : A National Cohort Study Between 2001 and 2012. / Yu, Chin Wei; Chang, Shy Shin; Lai, Chih Cheng; Wu, Jiunn Yih; Yen, Debra W.; Lee, Meng Tse Gabriel; Yeh, Chien Chun; Chung, Jui Yuan; Lin, Yu Jiun; Lee, Chien Chang.

In: Shock (Augusta, Ga.), Vol. 51, No. 5, 01.05.2019, p. 619-624.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yu, Chin Wei ; Chang, Shy Shin ; Lai, Chih Cheng ; Wu, Jiunn Yih ; Yen, Debra W. ; Lee, Meng Tse Gabriel ; Yeh, Chien Chun ; Chung, Jui Yuan ; Lin, Yu Jiun ; Lee, Chien Chang. / Epidemiology of Emergency Department Sepsis : A National Cohort Study Between 2001 and 2012. In: Shock (Augusta, Ga.). 2019 ; Vol. 51, No. 5. pp. 619-624.
@article{c20bc40fa8ac4ff1b6e7fbf4f2225c51,
title = "Epidemiology of Emergency Department Sepsis: A National Cohort Study Between 2001 and 2012",
abstract = "The aim of this study is to examine the incidence trend of sepsis over 11 years and compared mortality outcomes among Taiwanese patients with sepsis admitted from emergency department (ED) and non-ED routes. We used a nationwide health insurance database from Taiwan, which comprise of 23 million beneficiaries. Patients with sepsis were identified by ICD-9 CM codes for infection and organ dysfunction from 2001 to 2012. We performed propensity score matching and compared mortality rates between ED-admitted and non ED-admitted patients.During the 11-year study period, we identified 1,256,684 patients with sepsis. 493,397 (29.3{\%}) were admitted through the ED, and 763,287 (70.7{\%}) were admitted directly to the floor. For patients with sepsis, mortality in ED-admitted patients decreased from 27.2{\%} in 2002 to 21.1{\%} in 2012 while that in non-ED admitted patients decreased from 35.3{\%} in 2002 to 30.7{\%} in 2012. Although patients with sepsis admitted through the ED had a higher incidence of organ dysfunction than patients who were directly admitted, they had more favorable outcomes in mortality, length of intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay. After propensity score matching, ED-admitted patients had a 7{\%} lower risk of 90-day mortality (HR, 0.93, 95{\%} CI, 0.89-0.97) compared with directly admitted patients. During the study period, mortality declined faster among ED admitted sepsis patients than directly admitted sepsis patients. Results of this study should be interpreted in light of limitations. Like other administrative database studies, treatment details are not available. Further clinical studies evaluating the treatment and outcome difference between ED and non-ED admitted sepsis patients are warranted.",
author = "Yu, {Chin Wei} and Chang, {Shy Shin} and Lai, {Chih Cheng} and Wu, {Jiunn Yih} and Yen, {Debra W.} and Lee, {Meng Tse Gabriel} and Yeh, {Chien Chun} and Chung, {Jui Yuan} and Lin, {Yu Jiun} and Lee, {Chien Chang}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SHK.0000000000001219",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "619--624",
journal = "Shock",
issn = "1073-2322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epidemiology of Emergency Department Sepsis

T2 - A National Cohort Study Between 2001 and 2012

AU - Yu, Chin Wei

AU - Chang, Shy Shin

AU - Lai, Chih Cheng

AU - Wu, Jiunn Yih

AU - Yen, Debra W.

AU - Lee, Meng Tse Gabriel

AU - Yeh, Chien Chun

AU - Chung, Jui Yuan

AU - Lin, Yu Jiun

AU - Lee, Chien Chang

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - The aim of this study is to examine the incidence trend of sepsis over 11 years and compared mortality outcomes among Taiwanese patients with sepsis admitted from emergency department (ED) and non-ED routes. We used a nationwide health insurance database from Taiwan, which comprise of 23 million beneficiaries. Patients with sepsis were identified by ICD-9 CM codes for infection and organ dysfunction from 2001 to 2012. We performed propensity score matching and compared mortality rates between ED-admitted and non ED-admitted patients.During the 11-year study period, we identified 1,256,684 patients with sepsis. 493,397 (29.3%) were admitted through the ED, and 763,287 (70.7%) were admitted directly to the floor. For patients with sepsis, mortality in ED-admitted patients decreased from 27.2% in 2002 to 21.1% in 2012 while that in non-ED admitted patients decreased from 35.3% in 2002 to 30.7% in 2012. Although patients with sepsis admitted through the ED had a higher incidence of organ dysfunction than patients who were directly admitted, they had more favorable outcomes in mortality, length of intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay. After propensity score matching, ED-admitted patients had a 7% lower risk of 90-day mortality (HR, 0.93, 95% CI, 0.89-0.97) compared with directly admitted patients. During the study period, mortality declined faster among ED admitted sepsis patients than directly admitted sepsis patients. Results of this study should be interpreted in light of limitations. Like other administrative database studies, treatment details are not available. Further clinical studies evaluating the treatment and outcome difference between ED and non-ED admitted sepsis patients are warranted.

AB - The aim of this study is to examine the incidence trend of sepsis over 11 years and compared mortality outcomes among Taiwanese patients with sepsis admitted from emergency department (ED) and non-ED routes. We used a nationwide health insurance database from Taiwan, which comprise of 23 million beneficiaries. Patients with sepsis were identified by ICD-9 CM codes for infection and organ dysfunction from 2001 to 2012. We performed propensity score matching and compared mortality rates between ED-admitted and non ED-admitted patients.During the 11-year study period, we identified 1,256,684 patients with sepsis. 493,397 (29.3%) were admitted through the ED, and 763,287 (70.7%) were admitted directly to the floor. For patients with sepsis, mortality in ED-admitted patients decreased from 27.2% in 2002 to 21.1% in 2012 while that in non-ED admitted patients decreased from 35.3% in 2002 to 30.7% in 2012. Although patients with sepsis admitted through the ED had a higher incidence of organ dysfunction than patients who were directly admitted, they had more favorable outcomes in mortality, length of intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay. After propensity score matching, ED-admitted patients had a 7% lower risk of 90-day mortality (HR, 0.93, 95% CI, 0.89-0.97) compared with directly admitted patients. During the study period, mortality declined faster among ED admitted sepsis patients than directly admitted sepsis patients. Results of this study should be interpreted in light of limitations. Like other administrative database studies, treatment details are not available. Further clinical studies evaluating the treatment and outcome difference between ED and non-ED admitted sepsis patients are warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064853500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064853500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001219

DO - 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001219

M3 - Article

C2 - 30052578

AN - SCOPUS:85064853500

VL - 51

SP - 619

EP - 624

JO - Shock

JF - Shock

SN - 1073-2322

IS - 5

ER -