Effects of cane use and position on performance of the sit-to-stand task in stroke patients

Tung Chou Li, Keng Hua Tu, Huei Sheng Shiue, Mau Roung Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study was to examine the effect of cane use and cane positions on the sit-to-stand performance of stroke patients. Design In a crossover study, 30 stroke patients performed sit-to-stand test in seven situations in a random sequence: without a cane, three positions with a regular cane (parallel to the ankle, parallel to the 5th toe, and 10 cm in front of the 5th toe), and the same three positions with a quad cane. The peak vertical ground reaction force and maximum vertical cane support force during sit-to-stand were recorded. Results Using a cane significantly reduced the peak ground reaction force by 3% to 9% of body weight compared with that without a cane (P = 0.000-0.023). Different cane positions strongly influenced the maximum cane support force and peak ground reaction force. When the cane was closer to the ankle, the maximal cane support force increased by 6.7% to 8.6% of body weight, which resulted in a decrease in the peak ground reaction force. Conclusions Both types of cane reduced lower limbs' load during sit to stand. When the cane was closer to the trunk, the load on legs was lessened, whereas the load on the upper limb increased. Upper limb's load during sit to stand was greater when using quad cane than using regular cane.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)476-481
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume97
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Canes
Stroke
Toes
Ankle
Upper Extremity
Body Weight

Keywords

  • Cane
  • Sit-to-stand
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Effects of cane use and position on performance of the sit-to-stand task in stroke patients. / Li, Tung Chou; Tu, Keng Hua; Shiue, Huei Sheng; Lin, Mau Roung.

In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 97, No. 7, 01.07.2018, p. 476-481.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c7f63ee19b3c4194bff90faa96ee7ced,
title = "Effects of cane use and position on performance of the sit-to-stand task in stroke patients",
abstract = "Objective The aim of the study was to examine the effect of cane use and cane positions on the sit-to-stand performance of stroke patients. Design In a crossover study, 30 stroke patients performed sit-to-stand test in seven situations in a random sequence: without a cane, three positions with a regular cane (parallel to the ankle, parallel to the 5th toe, and 10 cm in front of the 5th toe), and the same three positions with a quad cane. The peak vertical ground reaction force and maximum vertical cane support force during sit-to-stand were recorded. Results Using a cane significantly reduced the peak ground reaction force by 3{\%} to 9{\%} of body weight compared with that without a cane (P = 0.000-0.023). Different cane positions strongly influenced the maximum cane support force and peak ground reaction force. When the cane was closer to the ankle, the maximal cane support force increased by 6.7{\%} to 8.6{\%} of body weight, which resulted in a decrease in the peak ground reaction force. Conclusions Both types of cane reduced lower limbs' load during sit to stand. When the cane was closer to the trunk, the load on legs was lessened, whereas the load on the upper limb increased. Upper limb's load during sit to stand was greater when using quad cane than using regular cane.",
keywords = "Cane, Sit-to-stand, Stroke, Cane, Sit-to-stand, Stroke",
author = "Li, {Tung Chou} and Tu, {Keng Hua} and Shiue, {Huei Sheng} and Lin, {Mau Roung}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHM.0000000000000898",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "476--481",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of cane use and position on performance of the sit-to-stand task in stroke patients

AU - Li, Tung Chou

AU - Tu, Keng Hua

AU - Shiue, Huei Sheng

AU - Lin, Mau Roung

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Objective The aim of the study was to examine the effect of cane use and cane positions on the sit-to-stand performance of stroke patients. Design In a crossover study, 30 stroke patients performed sit-to-stand test in seven situations in a random sequence: without a cane, three positions with a regular cane (parallel to the ankle, parallel to the 5th toe, and 10 cm in front of the 5th toe), and the same three positions with a quad cane. The peak vertical ground reaction force and maximum vertical cane support force during sit-to-stand were recorded. Results Using a cane significantly reduced the peak ground reaction force by 3% to 9% of body weight compared with that without a cane (P = 0.000-0.023). Different cane positions strongly influenced the maximum cane support force and peak ground reaction force. When the cane was closer to the ankle, the maximal cane support force increased by 6.7% to 8.6% of body weight, which resulted in a decrease in the peak ground reaction force. Conclusions Both types of cane reduced lower limbs' load during sit to stand. When the cane was closer to the trunk, the load on legs was lessened, whereas the load on the upper limb increased. Upper limb's load during sit to stand was greater when using quad cane than using regular cane.

AB - Objective The aim of the study was to examine the effect of cane use and cane positions on the sit-to-stand performance of stroke patients. Design In a crossover study, 30 stroke patients performed sit-to-stand test in seven situations in a random sequence: without a cane, three positions with a regular cane (parallel to the ankle, parallel to the 5th toe, and 10 cm in front of the 5th toe), and the same three positions with a quad cane. The peak vertical ground reaction force and maximum vertical cane support force during sit-to-stand were recorded. Results Using a cane significantly reduced the peak ground reaction force by 3% to 9% of body weight compared with that without a cane (P = 0.000-0.023). Different cane positions strongly influenced the maximum cane support force and peak ground reaction force. When the cane was closer to the ankle, the maximal cane support force increased by 6.7% to 8.6% of body weight, which resulted in a decrease in the peak ground reaction force. Conclusions Both types of cane reduced lower limbs' load during sit to stand. When the cane was closer to the trunk, the load on legs was lessened, whereas the load on the upper limb increased. Upper limb's load during sit to stand was greater when using quad cane than using regular cane.

KW - Cane

KW - Sit-to-stand

KW - Stroke

KW - Cane

KW - Sit-to-stand

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048854212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048854212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000898

DO - 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000898

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048854212

VL - 97

SP - 476

EP - 481

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 7

ER -