Dosimetric analysis and comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and radiation-induced liver disease

Jason Chia Hsien Cheng, Jian Kuen Wu, Chao Ming Huang, Hua Shan Liu, David Y. Huang, Stella Y. Tsai, Skye Hongiun Cheng, James Jer Min Jian, Andrew T. Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study compares the difference in dose-volume data between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and previously documented radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) after 3D-CRT. Methods and Materials: Between November 1993 and December 1999, 68 patients with HCC were treated with 3D-CRT at our institution. Twelve of them were diagnosed with RILD within 4 months of completion of 3D-CRT. RILD was defined as either anicteric elevation of alkaline phosphatase level of at least twofold and nonmalignant ascites, or elevated transaminases of at least fivefold the upper limit of normal or of pretreatment levels. Three-dimensional treatment planning using dose-volume histograms of normal liver was used to obtain the dose-volume data. These 12 patients with RILD were replanned with an IMRT planning system using the five-field (gantry angles 0°, 72°, 144°, 216°, and 288°) step-and-shoot technique to compare the dosimetric difference in targets and organs at risk between 3D-CRT and IMRT. Mean dose and normal tissue complication probability with literature-cited volume effect parameter of 0.32, curve steepness parameter of 0.15, and TD50(1) of 40 Gy, were used for the liver, whereas volume fraction at a given dose level was used for other critical structures. Paired Student t-test with 2-tailed p <0.05 was used to assess the statistical difference between the two techniques. Results: With comparable target coverage between 3D-CRT and five-field step-and-shoot IMRT, IMRT was able to obtain a large dose reduction in the spinal cord (5.7% vs. 33.2%, p = 0.007), and achieved at least similar organ sparing for kidneys and stomach. IMRT had diverse dosimetric effect on liver, with significant reduction in normal tissue complication probability (23.7% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.009), but significant increase in mean dose (2924 cGy vs. 2504 cGy, p = 0.009), as compared with 3D-CRT. Conclusion: IMRT is capable of preserving acceptable target coverage and improving or at least maintaining the nonhepatic organ sparing for patients with HCC and previously diagnosed RILD after 3D-CRT. The true impact of this technique on the liver remains unsettled and may depend on the exact volume effect of this organ.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-234
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Conformal Radiotherapy
Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
liver
Liver Diseases
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
cancer
Radiation
radiation
dosage
organs
Liver
planning
Organs at Risk
Organ Size
Transaminases
gantry cranes
stomach
Ascites

Keywords

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Intensity-modulated radiation therapy
  • Radiation-induced liver disease
  • Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation

Cite this

Dosimetric analysis and comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and radiation-induced liver disease. / Cheng, Jason Chia Hsien; Wu, Jian Kuen; Huang, Chao Ming; Liu, Hua Shan; Huang, David Y.; Tsai, Stella Y.; Cheng, Skye Hongiun; Jian, James Jer Min; Huang, Andrew T.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 56, No. 1, 01.05.2003, p. 229-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cheng, Jason Chia Hsien ; Wu, Jian Kuen ; Huang, Chao Ming ; Liu, Hua Shan ; Huang, David Y. ; Tsai, Stella Y. ; Cheng, Skye Hongiun ; Jian, James Jer Min ; Huang, Andrew T. / Dosimetric analysis and comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and radiation-induced liver disease. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2003 ; Vol. 56, No. 1. pp. 229-234.
@article{17a1622225c7419ba08dfb26b9d70b54,
title = "Dosimetric analysis and comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and radiation-induced liver disease",
abstract = "Purpose: This study compares the difference in dose-volume data between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and previously documented radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) after 3D-CRT. Methods and Materials: Between November 1993 and December 1999, 68 patients with HCC were treated with 3D-CRT at our institution. Twelve of them were diagnosed with RILD within 4 months of completion of 3D-CRT. RILD was defined as either anicteric elevation of alkaline phosphatase level of at least twofold and nonmalignant ascites, or elevated transaminases of at least fivefold the upper limit of normal or of pretreatment levels. Three-dimensional treatment planning using dose-volume histograms of normal liver was used to obtain the dose-volume data. These 12 patients with RILD were replanned with an IMRT planning system using the five-field (gantry angles 0°, 72°, 144°, 216°, and 288°) step-and-shoot technique to compare the dosimetric difference in targets and organs at risk between 3D-CRT and IMRT. Mean dose and normal tissue complication probability with literature-cited volume effect parameter of 0.32, curve steepness parameter of 0.15, and TD50(1) of 40 Gy, were used for the liver, whereas volume fraction at a given dose level was used for other critical structures. Paired Student t-test with 2-tailed p <0.05 was used to assess the statistical difference between the two techniques. Results: With comparable target coverage between 3D-CRT and five-field step-and-shoot IMRT, IMRT was able to obtain a large dose reduction in the spinal cord (5.7{\%} vs. 33.2{\%}, p = 0.007), and achieved at least similar organ sparing for kidneys and stomach. IMRT had diverse dosimetric effect on liver, with significant reduction in normal tissue complication probability (23.7{\%} vs. 36.6{\%}, p = 0.009), but significant increase in mean dose (2924 cGy vs. 2504 cGy, p = 0.009), as compared with 3D-CRT. Conclusion: IMRT is capable of preserving acceptable target coverage and improving or at least maintaining the nonhepatic organ sparing for patients with HCC and previously diagnosed RILD after 3D-CRT. The true impact of this technique on the liver remains unsettled and may depend on the exact volume effect of this organ.",
keywords = "Hepatocellular carcinoma, Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, Radiation-induced liver disease, Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy",
author = "Cheng, {Jason Chia Hsien} and Wu, {Jian Kuen} and Huang, {Chao Ming} and Liu, {Hua Shan} and Huang, {David Y.} and Tsai, {Stella Y.} and Cheng, {Skye Hongiun} and Jian, {James Jer Min} and Huang, {Andrew T.}",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00091-9",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "229--234",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dosimetric analysis and comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and radiation-induced liver disease

AU - Cheng, Jason Chia Hsien

AU - Wu, Jian Kuen

AU - Huang, Chao Ming

AU - Liu, Hua Shan

AU - Huang, David Y.

AU - Tsai, Stella Y.

AU - Cheng, Skye Hongiun

AU - Jian, James Jer Min

AU - Huang, Andrew T.

PY - 2003/5/1

Y1 - 2003/5/1

N2 - Purpose: This study compares the difference in dose-volume data between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and previously documented radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) after 3D-CRT. Methods and Materials: Between November 1993 and December 1999, 68 patients with HCC were treated with 3D-CRT at our institution. Twelve of them were diagnosed with RILD within 4 months of completion of 3D-CRT. RILD was defined as either anicteric elevation of alkaline phosphatase level of at least twofold and nonmalignant ascites, or elevated transaminases of at least fivefold the upper limit of normal or of pretreatment levels. Three-dimensional treatment planning using dose-volume histograms of normal liver was used to obtain the dose-volume data. These 12 patients with RILD were replanned with an IMRT planning system using the five-field (gantry angles 0°, 72°, 144°, 216°, and 288°) step-and-shoot technique to compare the dosimetric difference in targets and organs at risk between 3D-CRT and IMRT. Mean dose and normal tissue complication probability with literature-cited volume effect parameter of 0.32, curve steepness parameter of 0.15, and TD50(1) of 40 Gy, were used for the liver, whereas volume fraction at a given dose level was used for other critical structures. Paired Student t-test with 2-tailed p <0.05 was used to assess the statistical difference between the two techniques. Results: With comparable target coverage between 3D-CRT and five-field step-and-shoot IMRT, IMRT was able to obtain a large dose reduction in the spinal cord (5.7% vs. 33.2%, p = 0.007), and achieved at least similar organ sparing for kidneys and stomach. IMRT had diverse dosimetric effect on liver, with significant reduction in normal tissue complication probability (23.7% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.009), but significant increase in mean dose (2924 cGy vs. 2504 cGy, p = 0.009), as compared with 3D-CRT. Conclusion: IMRT is capable of preserving acceptable target coverage and improving or at least maintaining the nonhepatic organ sparing for patients with HCC and previously diagnosed RILD after 3D-CRT. The true impact of this technique on the liver remains unsettled and may depend on the exact volume effect of this organ.

AB - Purpose: This study compares the difference in dose-volume data between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and previously documented radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) after 3D-CRT. Methods and Materials: Between November 1993 and December 1999, 68 patients with HCC were treated with 3D-CRT at our institution. Twelve of them were diagnosed with RILD within 4 months of completion of 3D-CRT. RILD was defined as either anicteric elevation of alkaline phosphatase level of at least twofold and nonmalignant ascites, or elevated transaminases of at least fivefold the upper limit of normal or of pretreatment levels. Three-dimensional treatment planning using dose-volume histograms of normal liver was used to obtain the dose-volume data. These 12 patients with RILD were replanned with an IMRT planning system using the five-field (gantry angles 0°, 72°, 144°, 216°, and 288°) step-and-shoot technique to compare the dosimetric difference in targets and organs at risk between 3D-CRT and IMRT. Mean dose and normal tissue complication probability with literature-cited volume effect parameter of 0.32, curve steepness parameter of 0.15, and TD50(1) of 40 Gy, were used for the liver, whereas volume fraction at a given dose level was used for other critical structures. Paired Student t-test with 2-tailed p <0.05 was used to assess the statistical difference between the two techniques. Results: With comparable target coverage between 3D-CRT and five-field step-and-shoot IMRT, IMRT was able to obtain a large dose reduction in the spinal cord (5.7% vs. 33.2%, p = 0.007), and achieved at least similar organ sparing for kidneys and stomach. IMRT had diverse dosimetric effect on liver, with significant reduction in normal tissue complication probability (23.7% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.009), but significant increase in mean dose (2924 cGy vs. 2504 cGy, p = 0.009), as compared with 3D-CRT. Conclusion: IMRT is capable of preserving acceptable target coverage and improving or at least maintaining the nonhepatic organ sparing for patients with HCC and previously diagnosed RILD after 3D-CRT. The true impact of this technique on the liver remains unsettled and may depend on the exact volume effect of this organ.

KW - Hepatocellular carcinoma

KW - Intensity-modulated radiation therapy

KW - Radiation-induced liver disease

KW - Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344838592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344838592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00091-9

DO - 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00091-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 12694843

AN - SCOPUS:0344838592

VL - 56

SP - 229

EP - 234

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 1

ER -