Does high surgeon and hospital surgical volume raise the five-year survival rate for breast cancer? A population-based study

Chin Shyan Chen, Tsai Ching Liu, Herng Ching Lin, Yung Chang Lien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study sets out to examine the relationship between both surgeon and hospital volume and five-year survival rates for breast cancer patients. We performed Cox proportional hazard regressions on a pooled population-based database linking the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database with the 'cause of death' data file, covering the three-year period from January 1997 to December 1999. Of the 13,360 breast cancer resection patients in our study sample, the five-year survival rates, by surgeon volume, were 77.3% in the high-volume group (>201 cases), 76.9% in the medium-volume group (45-200), and 69.5% in the low-volume group (≤44). The five-year survival rates, by hospital volume, were 77.3% for high-volume hospitals (>585 cases), 74.5% for medium-volume hospitals (259-585) and 72.1% for low-volume hospitals (≤258). Cox regression analyses show that the risk of death for patients treated by low-volume surgeons was up to 1.305 times (P <0.001) as high as the risk for those treated by high-volume surgeons. Similarly, the risk of death for patients whose resections had been performed in low-volume hospitals was 1.484 times (P <0.001) as high as the risk for those whose resections had been performed in high-volume hospitals. High surgeon or hospital volume contributes significantly to patient outcomes and may be regarded as an overall indicator of high treatment quality; we therefore strongly recommend that the healthcare authorities reveal to the public all of the relevant information on provider performance and caseloads in order to assist them to make the optimum choice when surgery becomes necessary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)349-356
Number of pages8
JournalBreast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume110
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2008

Fingerprint

Survival Rate
Breast Neoplasms
Low-Volume Hospitals
High-Volume Hospitals
Population
Databases
Information Storage and Retrieval
National Health Programs
Taiwan
Cause of Death
Regression Analysis
Surgeons
Delivery of Health Care
Research
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Breast cancer surgery
  • Surgical volume
  • Survival
  • Taiwan

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Does high surgeon and hospital surgical volume raise the five-year survival rate for breast cancer? A population-based study. / Chen, Chin Shyan; Liu, Tsai Ching; Lin, Herng Ching; Lien, Yung Chang.

In: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Vol. 110, No. 2, 07.2008, p. 349-356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6f881f35fe814d7a8518b1a70b5abfed,
title = "Does high surgeon and hospital surgical volume raise the five-year survival rate for breast cancer? A population-based study",
abstract = "This study sets out to examine the relationship between both surgeon and hospital volume and five-year survival rates for breast cancer patients. We performed Cox proportional hazard regressions on a pooled population-based database linking the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database with the 'cause of death' data file, covering the three-year period from January 1997 to December 1999. Of the 13,360 breast cancer resection patients in our study sample, the five-year survival rates, by surgeon volume, were 77.3{\%} in the high-volume group (>201 cases), 76.9{\%} in the medium-volume group (45-200), and 69.5{\%} in the low-volume group (≤44). The five-year survival rates, by hospital volume, were 77.3{\%} for high-volume hospitals (>585 cases), 74.5{\%} for medium-volume hospitals (259-585) and 72.1{\%} for low-volume hospitals (≤258). Cox regression analyses show that the risk of death for patients treated by low-volume surgeons was up to 1.305 times (P <0.001) as high as the risk for those treated by high-volume surgeons. Similarly, the risk of death for patients whose resections had been performed in low-volume hospitals was 1.484 times (P <0.001) as high as the risk for those whose resections had been performed in high-volume hospitals. High surgeon or hospital volume contributes significantly to patient outcomes and may be regarded as an overall indicator of high treatment quality; we therefore strongly recommend that the healthcare authorities reveal to the public all of the relevant information on provider performance and caseloads in order to assist them to make the optimum choice when surgery becomes necessary.",
keywords = "Breast cancer surgery, Surgical volume, Survival, Taiwan",
author = "Chen, {Chin Shyan} and Liu, {Tsai Ching} and Lin, {Herng Ching} and Lien, {Yung Chang}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s10549-007-9715-4",
language = "English",
volume = "110",
pages = "349--356",
journal = "Breast Cancer Research and Treatment",
issn = "0167-6806",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does high surgeon and hospital surgical volume raise the five-year survival rate for breast cancer? A population-based study

AU - Chen, Chin Shyan

AU - Liu, Tsai Ching

AU - Lin, Herng Ching

AU - Lien, Yung Chang

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - This study sets out to examine the relationship between both surgeon and hospital volume and five-year survival rates for breast cancer patients. We performed Cox proportional hazard regressions on a pooled population-based database linking the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database with the 'cause of death' data file, covering the three-year period from January 1997 to December 1999. Of the 13,360 breast cancer resection patients in our study sample, the five-year survival rates, by surgeon volume, were 77.3% in the high-volume group (>201 cases), 76.9% in the medium-volume group (45-200), and 69.5% in the low-volume group (≤44). The five-year survival rates, by hospital volume, were 77.3% for high-volume hospitals (>585 cases), 74.5% for medium-volume hospitals (259-585) and 72.1% for low-volume hospitals (≤258). Cox regression analyses show that the risk of death for patients treated by low-volume surgeons was up to 1.305 times (P <0.001) as high as the risk for those treated by high-volume surgeons. Similarly, the risk of death for patients whose resections had been performed in low-volume hospitals was 1.484 times (P <0.001) as high as the risk for those whose resections had been performed in high-volume hospitals. High surgeon or hospital volume contributes significantly to patient outcomes and may be regarded as an overall indicator of high treatment quality; we therefore strongly recommend that the healthcare authorities reveal to the public all of the relevant information on provider performance and caseloads in order to assist them to make the optimum choice when surgery becomes necessary.

AB - This study sets out to examine the relationship between both surgeon and hospital volume and five-year survival rates for breast cancer patients. We performed Cox proportional hazard regressions on a pooled population-based database linking the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database with the 'cause of death' data file, covering the three-year period from January 1997 to December 1999. Of the 13,360 breast cancer resection patients in our study sample, the five-year survival rates, by surgeon volume, were 77.3% in the high-volume group (>201 cases), 76.9% in the medium-volume group (45-200), and 69.5% in the low-volume group (≤44). The five-year survival rates, by hospital volume, were 77.3% for high-volume hospitals (>585 cases), 74.5% for medium-volume hospitals (259-585) and 72.1% for low-volume hospitals (≤258). Cox regression analyses show that the risk of death for patients treated by low-volume surgeons was up to 1.305 times (P <0.001) as high as the risk for those treated by high-volume surgeons. Similarly, the risk of death for patients whose resections had been performed in low-volume hospitals was 1.484 times (P <0.001) as high as the risk for those whose resections had been performed in high-volume hospitals. High surgeon or hospital volume contributes significantly to patient outcomes and may be regarded as an overall indicator of high treatment quality; we therefore strongly recommend that the healthcare authorities reveal to the public all of the relevant information on provider performance and caseloads in order to assist them to make the optimum choice when surgery becomes necessary.

KW - Breast cancer surgery

KW - Surgical volume

KW - Survival

KW - Taiwan

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44849117167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44849117167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10549-007-9715-4

DO - 10.1007/s10549-007-9715-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 17874183

AN - SCOPUS:44849117167

VL - 110

SP - 349

EP - 356

JO - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

JF - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

SN - 0167-6806

IS - 2

ER -