Direct electrical stimulation on the injured ulnar nerve using acupuncture needles combined with rehabilitation accelerates nerve regeneration and functional recovery-A case report

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study illustrates that direct electrical stimulation (ES) improve functional recovery and time of return to work evaluated by prognostic scoring system after ulnar nerve injury. Design: The Rosén and Lundborg (R&L) protocol, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, and electromyography were applied for measuring improvements after direct ES intervention. Setting: A 32-year-old male with deep cutting wound and total rupture of right proximal forearm ulnar nerve was treated using direct ES and daily rehabilitation activities. Intervention: Direct ES, transmitted using 2 acupuncture needles inserted in the cubital tunnel, was applied along the site of the injured ulnar nerve. Other needles were placed according to muscle origins and insertions. All needles were connected to electrical stimulators. We executed these procedures once per week and conducted rehabilitating activities daily. Main outcome measures: The R&L protocol, DASH scores, and electromyography were used to measure the intervention outcomes. Results: The total score in the R&L protocol was 0.703 of the initial state; the sensory domain contributed the least amount. Among the improved numerical factors, pain/discomfort domain was the first to reach a stable ameliorative state in the first month. The sensory and motor domains reached stable growth in fourth and third months, respectively. The patient returned to the previous job in third month; his time off work was 75 days. Conclusions: Directly applying ES to the proximal site of an injured nerve can augment nerve regeneration through three suspected mechanisms. Although direct ES on the injured nerve contributed to an effective recovery of this patient with minimal adverse effects, additional investigation of treatment protocols is warranted and the actual mechanism must be identified.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-107
Number of pages5
JournalComplementary Therapies in Medicine
Volume24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Nerve Regeneration
Ulnar Nerve
Acupuncture
Electric Stimulation
Needles
Rehabilitation
Electromyography
Arm
Hand
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Return to Work
Wounds and Injuries
Clinical Protocols
Forearm
Rupture
Pain
Muscles
Growth

Keywords

  • Acupuncture
  • Axon regeneration
  • Electrical stimulation
  • Ulnar nerve injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine
  • Advanced and Specialised Nursing
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy

Cite this

@article{6b9e391ee4a0423388288d161675ca02,
title = "Direct electrical stimulation on the injured ulnar nerve using acupuncture needles combined with rehabilitation accelerates nerve regeneration and functional recovery-A case report",
abstract = "Objective: This study illustrates that direct electrical stimulation (ES) improve functional recovery and time of return to work evaluated by prognostic scoring system after ulnar nerve injury. Design: The Ros{\'e}n and Lundborg (R&L) protocol, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, and electromyography were applied for measuring improvements after direct ES intervention. Setting: A 32-year-old male with deep cutting wound and total rupture of right proximal forearm ulnar nerve was treated using direct ES and daily rehabilitation activities. Intervention: Direct ES, transmitted using 2 acupuncture needles inserted in the cubital tunnel, was applied along the site of the injured ulnar nerve. Other needles were placed according to muscle origins and insertions. All needles were connected to electrical stimulators. We executed these procedures once per week and conducted rehabilitating activities daily. Main outcome measures: The R&L protocol, DASH scores, and electromyography were used to measure the intervention outcomes. Results: The total score in the R&L protocol was 0.703 of the initial state; the sensory domain contributed the least amount. Among the improved numerical factors, pain/discomfort domain was the first to reach a stable ameliorative state in the first month. The sensory and motor domains reached stable growth in fourth and third months, respectively. The patient returned to the previous job in third month; his time off work was 75 days. Conclusions: Directly applying ES to the proximal site of an injured nerve can augment nerve regeneration through three suspected mechanisms. Although direct ES on the injured nerve contributed to an effective recovery of this patient with minimal adverse effects, additional investigation of treatment protocols is warranted and the actual mechanism must be identified.",
keywords = "Acupuncture, Axon regeneration, Electrical stimulation, Ulnar nerve injury",
author = "Tang, {You Jen} and Wu, {Min Huan} and Tai, {Chen Jei}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ctim.2015.12.003",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "103--107",
journal = "Complementary Therapies in Medicine",
issn = "0965-2299",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Direct electrical stimulation on the injured ulnar nerve using acupuncture needles combined with rehabilitation accelerates nerve regeneration and functional recovery-A case report

AU - Tang, You Jen

AU - Wu, Min Huan

AU - Tai, Chen Jei

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Objective: This study illustrates that direct electrical stimulation (ES) improve functional recovery and time of return to work evaluated by prognostic scoring system after ulnar nerve injury. Design: The Rosén and Lundborg (R&L) protocol, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, and electromyography were applied for measuring improvements after direct ES intervention. Setting: A 32-year-old male with deep cutting wound and total rupture of right proximal forearm ulnar nerve was treated using direct ES and daily rehabilitation activities. Intervention: Direct ES, transmitted using 2 acupuncture needles inserted in the cubital tunnel, was applied along the site of the injured ulnar nerve. Other needles were placed according to muscle origins and insertions. All needles were connected to electrical stimulators. We executed these procedures once per week and conducted rehabilitating activities daily. Main outcome measures: The R&L protocol, DASH scores, and electromyography were used to measure the intervention outcomes. Results: The total score in the R&L protocol was 0.703 of the initial state; the sensory domain contributed the least amount. Among the improved numerical factors, pain/discomfort domain was the first to reach a stable ameliorative state in the first month. The sensory and motor domains reached stable growth in fourth and third months, respectively. The patient returned to the previous job in third month; his time off work was 75 days. Conclusions: Directly applying ES to the proximal site of an injured nerve can augment nerve regeneration through three suspected mechanisms. Although direct ES on the injured nerve contributed to an effective recovery of this patient with minimal adverse effects, additional investigation of treatment protocols is warranted and the actual mechanism must be identified.

AB - Objective: This study illustrates that direct electrical stimulation (ES) improve functional recovery and time of return to work evaluated by prognostic scoring system after ulnar nerve injury. Design: The Rosén and Lundborg (R&L) protocol, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, and electromyography were applied for measuring improvements after direct ES intervention. Setting: A 32-year-old male with deep cutting wound and total rupture of right proximal forearm ulnar nerve was treated using direct ES and daily rehabilitation activities. Intervention: Direct ES, transmitted using 2 acupuncture needles inserted in the cubital tunnel, was applied along the site of the injured ulnar nerve. Other needles were placed according to muscle origins and insertions. All needles were connected to electrical stimulators. We executed these procedures once per week and conducted rehabilitating activities daily. Main outcome measures: The R&L protocol, DASH scores, and electromyography were used to measure the intervention outcomes. Results: The total score in the R&L protocol was 0.703 of the initial state; the sensory domain contributed the least amount. Among the improved numerical factors, pain/discomfort domain was the first to reach a stable ameliorative state in the first month. The sensory and motor domains reached stable growth in fourth and third months, respectively. The patient returned to the previous job in third month; his time off work was 75 days. Conclusions: Directly applying ES to the proximal site of an injured nerve can augment nerve regeneration through three suspected mechanisms. Although direct ES on the injured nerve contributed to an effective recovery of this patient with minimal adverse effects, additional investigation of treatment protocols is warranted and the actual mechanism must be identified.

KW - Acupuncture

KW - Axon regeneration

KW - Electrical stimulation

KW - Ulnar nerve injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957637053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957637053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.12.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 26860810

AN - SCOPUS:84957637053

VL - 24

SP - 103

EP - 107

JO - Complementary Therapies in Medicine

JF - Complementary Therapies in Medicine

SN - 0965-2299

ER -