Differential CT features of acute lentiform subdural hematoma and epidural hematoma

I. Chang Su, Kuo Chuan Wang, Shih Hao Huang, Chien Hsun Li, Lu Ting Kuo, Jin Er Lee, Ham Min Tseng, Yong Kwang Tu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Acute subdural hematoma (SDH) normally appears as a panhemispheric collection of blood with a crescent configuration. However, a number of SDH show lentiform appearances, mimicking acute epidural hematoma (EDH). In this study, we reported our experiences with this special disease entity. Radiological features that aided in the accurate localization of the hematoma were also addressed. Patients and methods: From among 51 acute SDH cases who were surgically treated between July 2007 and April 2008, five cases whose SDH had a localized convex appearance were enrolled. Surgical records and CT images were retrospectively reviewed. Important CT features that could differentiate lentiform SDH from EDH were especially analyzed. Results: Subdural adhesions were major causes of localized SDH in four out of five patients, all of whom had previous neurosurgical interventions or radiotherapy. Though those hematomas appeared as biconvex on CT scans, four differential features could be identified in favor of SDH. These included a crescentic tail, an obtuse angle at the margin of the hematoma, a dural line above the hematoma and a direct connection to the underlying intracerebral hematomas. Conclusions: Biconvex localized SDH might be misinterpreted as acute EDH if the diagnosis is based on the shape of the hematoma alone. This study emphasized that a detailed evaluation of surgical histories and CT features are mandatory in differentiating lentiform SDH and EDH.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)552-556
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Volume112
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hematoma, Subdural, Acute
Hematoma
Subdural Hematoma
Radiotherapy

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • Differential diagnosis
  • Epidural hematoma
  • Postoperative complications
  • Subdural hematoma
  • Traumatic brain injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Differential CT features of acute lentiform subdural hematoma and epidural hematoma. / Su, I. Chang; Wang, Kuo Chuan; Huang, Shih Hao; Li, Chien Hsun; Kuo, Lu Ting; Lee, Jin Er; Tseng, Ham Min; Tu, Yong Kwang.

In: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, Vol. 112, No. 7, 01.09.2010, p. 552-556.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Su, I. Chang ; Wang, Kuo Chuan ; Huang, Shih Hao ; Li, Chien Hsun ; Kuo, Lu Ting ; Lee, Jin Er ; Tseng, Ham Min ; Tu, Yong Kwang. / Differential CT features of acute lentiform subdural hematoma and epidural hematoma. In: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2010 ; Vol. 112, No. 7. pp. 552-556.
@article{59d85e6e05ab45ea8db73f364689e326,
title = "Differential CT features of acute lentiform subdural hematoma and epidural hematoma",
abstract = "Objectives: Acute subdural hematoma (SDH) normally appears as a panhemispheric collection of blood with a crescent configuration. However, a number of SDH show lentiform appearances, mimicking acute epidural hematoma (EDH). In this study, we reported our experiences with this special disease entity. Radiological features that aided in the accurate localization of the hematoma were also addressed. Patients and methods: From among 51 acute SDH cases who were surgically treated between July 2007 and April 2008, five cases whose SDH had a localized convex appearance were enrolled. Surgical records and CT images were retrospectively reviewed. Important CT features that could differentiate lentiform SDH from EDH were especially analyzed. Results: Subdural adhesions were major causes of localized SDH in four out of five patients, all of whom had previous neurosurgical interventions or radiotherapy. Though those hematomas appeared as biconvex on CT scans, four differential features could be identified in favor of SDH. These included a crescentic tail, an obtuse angle at the margin of the hematoma, a dural line above the hematoma and a direct connection to the underlying intracerebral hematomas. Conclusions: Biconvex localized SDH might be misinterpreted as acute EDH if the diagnosis is based on the shape of the hematoma alone. This study emphasized that a detailed evaluation of surgical histories and CT features are mandatory in differentiating lentiform SDH and EDH.",
keywords = "Computed tomography, Differential diagnosis, Epidural hematoma, Postoperative complications, Subdural hematoma, Traumatic brain injury",
author = "Su, {I. Chang} and Wang, {Kuo Chuan} and Huang, {Shih Hao} and Li, {Chien Hsun} and Kuo, {Lu Ting} and Lee, {Jin Er} and Tseng, {Ham Min} and Tu, {Yong Kwang}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "552--556",
journal = "Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery",
issn = "0303-8467",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential CT features of acute lentiform subdural hematoma and epidural hematoma

AU - Su, I. Chang

AU - Wang, Kuo Chuan

AU - Huang, Shih Hao

AU - Li, Chien Hsun

AU - Kuo, Lu Ting

AU - Lee, Jin Er

AU - Tseng, Ham Min

AU - Tu, Yong Kwang

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - Objectives: Acute subdural hematoma (SDH) normally appears as a panhemispheric collection of blood with a crescent configuration. However, a number of SDH show lentiform appearances, mimicking acute epidural hematoma (EDH). In this study, we reported our experiences with this special disease entity. Radiological features that aided in the accurate localization of the hematoma were also addressed. Patients and methods: From among 51 acute SDH cases who were surgically treated between July 2007 and April 2008, five cases whose SDH had a localized convex appearance were enrolled. Surgical records and CT images were retrospectively reviewed. Important CT features that could differentiate lentiform SDH from EDH were especially analyzed. Results: Subdural adhesions were major causes of localized SDH in four out of five patients, all of whom had previous neurosurgical interventions or radiotherapy. Though those hematomas appeared as biconvex on CT scans, four differential features could be identified in favor of SDH. These included a crescentic tail, an obtuse angle at the margin of the hematoma, a dural line above the hematoma and a direct connection to the underlying intracerebral hematomas. Conclusions: Biconvex localized SDH might be misinterpreted as acute EDH if the diagnosis is based on the shape of the hematoma alone. This study emphasized that a detailed evaluation of surgical histories and CT features are mandatory in differentiating lentiform SDH and EDH.

AB - Objectives: Acute subdural hematoma (SDH) normally appears as a panhemispheric collection of blood with a crescent configuration. However, a number of SDH show lentiform appearances, mimicking acute epidural hematoma (EDH). In this study, we reported our experiences with this special disease entity. Radiological features that aided in the accurate localization of the hematoma were also addressed. Patients and methods: From among 51 acute SDH cases who were surgically treated between July 2007 and April 2008, five cases whose SDH had a localized convex appearance were enrolled. Surgical records and CT images were retrospectively reviewed. Important CT features that could differentiate lentiform SDH from EDH were especially analyzed. Results: Subdural adhesions were major causes of localized SDH in four out of five patients, all of whom had previous neurosurgical interventions or radiotherapy. Though those hematomas appeared as biconvex on CT scans, four differential features could be identified in favor of SDH. These included a crescentic tail, an obtuse angle at the margin of the hematoma, a dural line above the hematoma and a direct connection to the underlying intracerebral hematomas. Conclusions: Biconvex localized SDH might be misinterpreted as acute EDH if the diagnosis is based on the shape of the hematoma alone. This study emphasized that a detailed evaluation of surgical histories and CT features are mandatory in differentiating lentiform SDH and EDH.

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Differential diagnosis

KW - Epidural hematoma

KW - Postoperative complications

KW - Subdural hematoma

KW - Traumatic brain injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955655546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955655546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - 112

SP - 552

EP - 556

JO - Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

JF - Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

SN - 0303-8467

IS - 7

ER -