Different Mechanisms of Airway Hyperresponsiveness between Exercise and Methacholine-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Chronic Asthma

林 孟賢(Meng-Hsien Lin), 蘇 榮璋(Jung-Chang Su), 鄭 志賢(Chi-Hsien Cheng), 林 鴻銓(Horng-Chyuan Lin), 王 圳華(Chun-Hua Wang), 江 玲玲(Ling-Ling Chiang), 郭 漢彬(Han-Pin Kuo)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore the different mechanisms of exercise-(EIB) and methacholine-(MIB) induced bronchoconstriction in patients with chronic asthma. Methods: We measured the FEV1, recovery time (RT), and AUC 0-60 min (area under the curve from 0 to 60 min after exercise in FEV1) in 41 asthmatics, who received exercise and methacholine challenge tests. Results: Among these asthmatics, 12 asthmatics had EIB and 29 had no EIB. The recovery time was prolonged (109.2 ±26.5 min, n= 11, p<0.001) and AUC 0-60 min was larger (1201.0 ± 70.0 % ‧min, p<0.0001) in the EIB group, compared to the non-EIB group (RT : 36.9±5.9 min; AUC : 328.0 ± 28.0 %·min, respectively, n=28). There was no difference in AUC and RT after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction between the EIB and non-EIB groups (1136.0 ± 115.8 versus 1121.0 ± 122.7 %.min, p= 0.936; 111.5 ± 14.2 versus 106.0 ± 14.3 min, p=0.757 ). There was no significant correlation between the magnitude of AUC induced by exercise test or methacholine challenge (r= 0.24) Conclusion: We suggested that there were different mechanisms between EIB and MIB. The delayed bronchodilation in the EIB asthmatic subjects was probably related to presence of bronchoconstrictors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)116-123
Number of pages8
Journal胸腔醫學
Volume18
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Bronchoconstriction
Methacholine Chloride
Area Under Curve
Asthma
Exercise
Bronchoconstrictor Agents
Exercise Test

Keywords

  • exercise-induced bronchoconstriction
  • methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction
  • asthma
  • recovery time
  • area under curve

Cite this

林孟賢(Meng-Hsien L, 蘇榮璋(Jung-Chang S, 鄭志賢(Chi-Hsien C, 林鴻銓(Horng-Chyuan L, 王圳華(Chun-Hua W, 江玲玲(Ling-Ling C, & 郭漢彬(Han-Pin K (2003). Different Mechanisms of Airway Hyperresponsiveness between Exercise and Methacholine-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Chronic Asthma. 胸腔醫學, 18(2), 116-123.

Different Mechanisms of Airway Hyperresponsiveness between Exercise and Methacholine-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Chronic Asthma. / 林孟賢(Meng-Hsien Lin); 蘇榮璋(Jung-Chang Su); 鄭志賢(Chi-Hsien Cheng); 林鴻銓(Horng-Chyuan Lin); 王圳華(Chun-Hua Wang); 江玲玲(Ling-Ling Chiang); 郭漢彬(Han-Pin Kuo).

In: 胸腔醫學, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2003, p. 116-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

林孟賢(Meng-HsienL, 蘇榮璋(Jung-ChangS, 鄭志賢(Chi-HsienC, 林鴻銓(Horng-ChyuanL, 王圳華(Chun-HuaW, 江玲玲(Ling-LingC & 郭漢彬(Han-PinK 2003, 'Different Mechanisms of Airway Hyperresponsiveness between Exercise and Methacholine-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Chronic Asthma', 胸腔醫學, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 116-123.
林孟賢(Meng-HsienL, 蘇榮璋(Jung-ChangS, 鄭志賢(Chi-HsienC, 林鴻銓(Horng-ChyuanL, 王圳華(Chun-HuaW, 江玲玲(Ling-LingC et al. Different Mechanisms of Airway Hyperresponsiveness between Exercise and Methacholine-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Chronic Asthma. 胸腔醫學. 2003;18(2):116-123.
林孟賢(Meng-Hsien Lin) ; 蘇榮璋(Jung-Chang Su) ; 鄭志賢(Chi-Hsien Cheng) ; 林鴻銓(Horng-Chyuan Lin) ; 王圳華(Chun-Hua Wang) ; 江玲玲(Ling-Ling Chiang) ; 郭漢彬(Han-Pin Kuo). / Different Mechanisms of Airway Hyperresponsiveness between Exercise and Methacholine-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Chronic Asthma. In: 胸腔醫學. 2003 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 116-123.
@article{5ff6a3baa92c4743a77b28e39bb96a47,
title = "Different Mechanisms of Airway Hyperresponsiveness between Exercise and Methacholine-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Chronic Asthma",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore the different mechanisms of exercise-(EIB) and methacholine-(MIB) induced bronchoconstriction in patients with chronic asthma. Methods: We measured the FEV1, recovery time (RT), and AUC 0-60 min (area under the curve from 0 to 60 min after exercise in FEV1) in 41 asthmatics, who received exercise and methacholine challenge tests. Results: Among these asthmatics, 12 asthmatics had EIB and 29 had no EIB. The recovery time was prolonged (109.2 ±26.5 min, n= 11, p<0.001) and AUC 0-60 min was larger (1201.0 ± 70.0 {\%} ‧min, p<0.0001) in the EIB group, compared to the non-EIB group (RT : 36.9±5.9 min; AUC : 328.0 ± 28.0 {\%}·min, respectively, n=28). There was no difference in AUC and RT after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction between the EIB and non-EIB groups (1136.0 ± 115.8 versus 1121.0 ± 122.7 {\%}.min, p= 0.936; 111.5 ± 14.2 versus 106.0 ± 14.3 min, p=0.757 ). There was no significant correlation between the magnitude of AUC induced by exercise test or methacholine challenge (r= 0.24) Conclusion: We suggested that there were different mechanisms between EIB and MIB. The delayed bronchodilation in the EIB asthmatic subjects was probably related to presence of bronchoconstrictors.",
keywords = "exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction, asthma, recovery time, area under curve, exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction , asthma, recovery time, area under curve",
author = "林, {孟賢(Meng-Hsien Lin)} and 蘇, {榮璋(Jung-Chang Su)} and 鄭, {志賢(Chi-Hsien Cheng)} and 林, {鴻銓(Horng-Chyuan Lin)} and 王, {圳華(Chun-Hua Wang)} and 江, {玲玲(Ling-Ling Chiang)} and 郭, {漢彬(Han-Pin Kuo)}",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "116--123",
journal = "胸腔醫學",
issn = "1023-9855",
publisher = "臺灣胸腔暨重症加護醫學會",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different Mechanisms of Airway Hyperresponsiveness between Exercise and Methacholine-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Chronic Asthma

AU - 林, 孟賢(Meng-Hsien Lin)

AU - 蘇, 榮璋(Jung-Chang Su)

AU - 鄭, 志賢(Chi-Hsien Cheng)

AU - 林, 鴻銓(Horng-Chyuan Lin)

AU - 王, 圳華(Chun-Hua Wang)

AU - 江, 玲玲(Ling-Ling Chiang)

AU - 郭, 漢彬(Han-Pin Kuo)

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore the different mechanisms of exercise-(EIB) and methacholine-(MIB) induced bronchoconstriction in patients with chronic asthma. Methods: We measured the FEV1, recovery time (RT), and AUC 0-60 min (area under the curve from 0 to 60 min after exercise in FEV1) in 41 asthmatics, who received exercise and methacholine challenge tests. Results: Among these asthmatics, 12 asthmatics had EIB and 29 had no EIB. The recovery time was prolonged (109.2 ±26.5 min, n= 11, p<0.001) and AUC 0-60 min was larger (1201.0 ± 70.0 % ‧min, p<0.0001) in the EIB group, compared to the non-EIB group (RT : 36.9±5.9 min; AUC : 328.0 ± 28.0 %·min, respectively, n=28). There was no difference in AUC and RT after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction between the EIB and non-EIB groups (1136.0 ± 115.8 versus 1121.0 ± 122.7 %.min, p= 0.936; 111.5 ± 14.2 versus 106.0 ± 14.3 min, p=0.757 ). There was no significant correlation between the magnitude of AUC induced by exercise test or methacholine challenge (r= 0.24) Conclusion: We suggested that there were different mechanisms between EIB and MIB. The delayed bronchodilation in the EIB asthmatic subjects was probably related to presence of bronchoconstrictors.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore the different mechanisms of exercise-(EIB) and methacholine-(MIB) induced bronchoconstriction in patients with chronic asthma. Methods: We measured the FEV1, recovery time (RT), and AUC 0-60 min (area under the curve from 0 to 60 min after exercise in FEV1) in 41 asthmatics, who received exercise and methacholine challenge tests. Results: Among these asthmatics, 12 asthmatics had EIB and 29 had no EIB. The recovery time was prolonged (109.2 ±26.5 min, n= 11, p<0.001) and AUC 0-60 min was larger (1201.0 ± 70.0 % ‧min, p<0.0001) in the EIB group, compared to the non-EIB group (RT : 36.9±5.9 min; AUC : 328.0 ± 28.0 %·min, respectively, n=28). There was no difference in AUC and RT after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction between the EIB and non-EIB groups (1136.0 ± 115.8 versus 1121.0 ± 122.7 %.min, p= 0.936; 111.5 ± 14.2 versus 106.0 ± 14.3 min, p=0.757 ). There was no significant correlation between the magnitude of AUC induced by exercise test or methacholine challenge (r= 0.24) Conclusion: We suggested that there were different mechanisms between EIB and MIB. The delayed bronchodilation in the EIB asthmatic subjects was probably related to presence of bronchoconstrictors.

KW - exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

KW - methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction

KW - asthma

KW - recovery time

KW - area under curve

KW - exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

KW - methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction

KW - asthma

KW - recovery time

KW - area under curve

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 116

EP - 123

JO - 胸腔醫學

JF - 胸腔醫學

SN - 1023-9855

IS - 2

ER -