Development and validation of a scoring system predicting failure of endoscopic epinephrine injection therapy in Taiwanese patients with bleeding peptic ulcers

Yi Shin Huang, Hwai Jeng Lin, Yi Rern Fang, Kelly Wang, Full Young Chang, Shou Dong Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Endoscopic epinephrine injection therapy (EIT) is always the first choice of treatment for bleeding peptic ulcers, although it fails in 15% to 30% of patients. The aim of this study was to develop a new scoring system to predict the failure in EIT, and to validate this scoring model prospectively. Methods. This study enrolled 125 patients who presented with the stigmata of hemorrhage of peptic ulcers and underwent EIT. Patients with coagulopathy were excluded from the study. Univariate analysis of the clinical and endoscopic parameters to predict failure in EIT was performed first. A multiple logistic regression was used to develop a scoring system. This scoring equation was further applied to 50 prospective patients with bleeding peptic ulcers to validate its predictive value. Results. EIT failed to arrest bleeding in 32 (25.6%) patients. Shock, blood transfusion of at least 500 ml, active bleeding, and ulcer size were effective in predicting failure in EIT as calculated by univariate analysis, while multivariate analysis showed shock, active bleeding and ulcer size to be the independent predictors. The scoring equation, defined as -3.14 + 1.29 (shock) + 0.99 (active bleeding) + 0.13 (ulcer size in mm), had a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 76.9% in predicting failure of EIT in the prospective cohort of 50 bleeding patients. Conclusions. The presence of shock, active bleeding (spurting or oozing hemorrhage) and ulcer size are risk factors of failure of EIT in Taiwanese patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. The scoring system based on these three parameters can predict failure in EIT, while alternative treatment should be considered in case patients fail EIT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)144-150
Number of pages7
JournalChinese Medical Journal (Taipei)
Volume65
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Peptic Ulcer
Epinephrine
Hemorrhage
Injections
Ulcer
Shock
Therapeutics
Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage
Christianity
Complementary Therapies
Blood Transfusion
Multivariate Analysis
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • Bleeding peptic ulcer
  • Endoscopy
  • Epinephrine
  • Injection therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Development and validation of a scoring system predicting failure of endoscopic epinephrine injection therapy in Taiwanese patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. / Huang, Yi Shin; Lin, Hwai Jeng; Fang, Yi Rern; Wang, Kelly; Chang, Full Young; Lee, Shou Dong.

In: Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei), Vol. 65, No. 4, 2002, p. 144-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e66159d7335e413696de2162252b0b02,
title = "Development and validation of a scoring system predicting failure of endoscopic epinephrine injection therapy in Taiwanese patients with bleeding peptic ulcers",
abstract = "Background. Endoscopic epinephrine injection therapy (EIT) is always the first choice of treatment for bleeding peptic ulcers, although it fails in 15{\%} to 30{\%} of patients. The aim of this study was to develop a new scoring system to predict the failure in EIT, and to validate this scoring model prospectively. Methods. This study enrolled 125 patients who presented with the stigmata of hemorrhage of peptic ulcers and underwent EIT. Patients with coagulopathy were excluded from the study. Univariate analysis of the clinical and endoscopic parameters to predict failure in EIT was performed first. A multiple logistic regression was used to develop a scoring system. This scoring equation was further applied to 50 prospective patients with bleeding peptic ulcers to validate its predictive value. Results. EIT failed to arrest bleeding in 32 (25.6{\%}) patients. Shock, blood transfusion of at least 500 ml, active bleeding, and ulcer size were effective in predicting failure in EIT as calculated by univariate analysis, while multivariate analysis showed shock, active bleeding and ulcer size to be the independent predictors. The scoring equation, defined as -3.14 + 1.29 (shock) + 0.99 (active bleeding) + 0.13 (ulcer size in mm), had a sensitivity of 81.8{\%} and a specificity of 76.9{\%} in predicting failure of EIT in the prospective cohort of 50 bleeding patients. Conclusions. The presence of shock, active bleeding (spurting or oozing hemorrhage) and ulcer size are risk factors of failure of EIT in Taiwanese patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. The scoring system based on these three parameters can predict failure in EIT, while alternative treatment should be considered in case patients fail EIT.",
keywords = "Bleeding peptic ulcer, Endoscopy, Epinephrine, Injection therapy",
author = "Huang, {Yi Shin} and Lin, {Hwai Jeng} and Fang, {Yi Rern} and Kelly Wang and Chang, {Full Young} and Lee, {Shou Dong}",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "144--150",
journal = "Journal of the Chinese Medical Association",
issn = "1726-4901",
publisher = "Elsevier Taiwan LLC",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and validation of a scoring system predicting failure of endoscopic epinephrine injection therapy in Taiwanese patients with bleeding peptic ulcers

AU - Huang, Yi Shin

AU - Lin, Hwai Jeng

AU - Fang, Yi Rern

AU - Wang, Kelly

AU - Chang, Full Young

AU - Lee, Shou Dong

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Background. Endoscopic epinephrine injection therapy (EIT) is always the first choice of treatment for bleeding peptic ulcers, although it fails in 15% to 30% of patients. The aim of this study was to develop a new scoring system to predict the failure in EIT, and to validate this scoring model prospectively. Methods. This study enrolled 125 patients who presented with the stigmata of hemorrhage of peptic ulcers and underwent EIT. Patients with coagulopathy were excluded from the study. Univariate analysis of the clinical and endoscopic parameters to predict failure in EIT was performed first. A multiple logistic regression was used to develop a scoring system. This scoring equation was further applied to 50 prospective patients with bleeding peptic ulcers to validate its predictive value. Results. EIT failed to arrest bleeding in 32 (25.6%) patients. Shock, blood transfusion of at least 500 ml, active bleeding, and ulcer size were effective in predicting failure in EIT as calculated by univariate analysis, while multivariate analysis showed shock, active bleeding and ulcer size to be the independent predictors. The scoring equation, defined as -3.14 + 1.29 (shock) + 0.99 (active bleeding) + 0.13 (ulcer size in mm), had a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 76.9% in predicting failure of EIT in the prospective cohort of 50 bleeding patients. Conclusions. The presence of shock, active bleeding (spurting or oozing hemorrhage) and ulcer size are risk factors of failure of EIT in Taiwanese patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. The scoring system based on these three parameters can predict failure in EIT, while alternative treatment should be considered in case patients fail EIT.

AB - Background. Endoscopic epinephrine injection therapy (EIT) is always the first choice of treatment for bleeding peptic ulcers, although it fails in 15% to 30% of patients. The aim of this study was to develop a new scoring system to predict the failure in EIT, and to validate this scoring model prospectively. Methods. This study enrolled 125 patients who presented with the stigmata of hemorrhage of peptic ulcers and underwent EIT. Patients with coagulopathy were excluded from the study. Univariate analysis of the clinical and endoscopic parameters to predict failure in EIT was performed first. A multiple logistic regression was used to develop a scoring system. This scoring equation was further applied to 50 prospective patients with bleeding peptic ulcers to validate its predictive value. Results. EIT failed to arrest bleeding in 32 (25.6%) patients. Shock, blood transfusion of at least 500 ml, active bleeding, and ulcer size were effective in predicting failure in EIT as calculated by univariate analysis, while multivariate analysis showed shock, active bleeding and ulcer size to be the independent predictors. The scoring equation, defined as -3.14 + 1.29 (shock) + 0.99 (active bleeding) + 0.13 (ulcer size in mm), had a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 76.9% in predicting failure of EIT in the prospective cohort of 50 bleeding patients. Conclusions. The presence of shock, active bleeding (spurting or oozing hemorrhage) and ulcer size are risk factors of failure of EIT in Taiwanese patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. The scoring system based on these three parameters can predict failure in EIT, while alternative treatment should be considered in case patients fail EIT.

KW - Bleeding peptic ulcer

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Epinephrine

KW - Injection therapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036302542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036302542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 144

EP - 150

JO - Journal of the Chinese Medical Association

JF - Journal of the Chinese Medical Association

SN - 1726-4901

IS - 4

ER -