Correlation of in vivo and in vitro measurements of sun protection factor

Ming Thau Sheu, Cheng Wen Lin, Ming Chuan Huang, Chao Hui Shen, Hsiu O. Ho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, the correlation of measuring sun protection factor (SPF) values between in vivo and in vitro tests was investigated for the purpose of monitoring the in vivo efficacy of sunscreen products using in vitro tests instead of in vivo tests to lessen the labor burden. Eight products, including standard product of the US FDA (SPF 4) and COLIPA (SPF 15) and six commercial products, were included for comparison. For the in vivo test, the test sample was evenly applied to the skin at a concentration of 2 mg/cm2 using a finger stall. The lag time between application and UV irradiation was about 15 min. A Multiport UV Solar Simulator with six outputs was used as the UV source. Six test sites were exposed to UV irradiation with a progression of UV doses of 25% from output to output. The minimal erythemal dose (MED) was assessed visually after 24 hr of UV exposure. During the in vitro test, each sunscreen was evenly spread on 3M Transpore® tape and the transmittance was measured with a UV transmittance analyzer equipped with a single-flash xenon lamp. The results demonstrated that the SPF values of the in vivo tests were close to the claimed value, indicating that SPF values measured in this study were reliable. However, statistical analysis by t-test or ANOVA showed that significant difference in SPF values existed between in vivo and in vitro tests for most products. Thus, a correlation of SPF measurement between in vitro and in vivo tests could not be constructed. According to these results, using a UV transmittance analyzer to measure SPF values is not a reliable method to correlate with the results of in vivo tests, and so this is not a practical way to monitor the effectiveness of sunscreen products.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)128-132
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Food and Drug Analysis
Volume11
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2003

Fingerprint

Sun Protection Factor
Sunscreening Agents
testing
transmittance
Xenon
In Vitro Techniques
irradiation
xenon
Fingers
monitoring
Analysis of Variance
dosage

Keywords

  • Correlation
  • In vitro test
  • In vivo test
  • SPF

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Correlation of in vivo and in vitro measurements of sun protection factor. / Sheu, Ming Thau; Lin, Cheng Wen; Huang, Ming Chuan; Shen, Chao Hui; Ho, Hsiu O.

In: Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, Vol. 11, No. 2, 06.2003, p. 128-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sheu, Ming Thau ; Lin, Cheng Wen ; Huang, Ming Chuan ; Shen, Chao Hui ; Ho, Hsiu O. / Correlation of in vivo and in vitro measurements of sun protection factor. In: Journal of Food and Drug Analysis. 2003 ; Vol. 11, No. 2. pp. 128-132.
@article{40ef5bebc60e4ab092e970e2641a8e50,
title = "Correlation of in vivo and in vitro measurements of sun protection factor",
abstract = "In this study, the correlation of measuring sun protection factor (SPF) values between in vivo and in vitro tests was investigated for the purpose of monitoring the in vivo efficacy of sunscreen products using in vitro tests instead of in vivo tests to lessen the labor burden. Eight products, including standard product of the US FDA (SPF 4) and COLIPA (SPF 15) and six commercial products, were included for comparison. For the in vivo test, the test sample was evenly applied to the skin at a concentration of 2 mg/cm2 using a finger stall. The lag time between application and UV irradiation was about 15 min. A Multiport UV Solar Simulator with six outputs was used as the UV source. Six test sites were exposed to UV irradiation with a progression of UV doses of 25{\%} from output to output. The minimal erythemal dose (MED) was assessed visually after 24 hr of UV exposure. During the in vitro test, each sunscreen was evenly spread on 3M Transpore{\circledR} tape and the transmittance was measured with a UV transmittance analyzer equipped with a single-flash xenon lamp. The results demonstrated that the SPF values of the in vivo tests were close to the claimed value, indicating that SPF values measured in this study were reliable. However, statistical analysis by t-test or ANOVA showed that significant difference in SPF values existed between in vivo and in vitro tests for most products. Thus, a correlation of SPF measurement between in vitro and in vivo tests could not be constructed. According to these results, using a UV transmittance analyzer to measure SPF values is not a reliable method to correlate with the results of in vivo tests, and so this is not a practical way to monitor the effectiveness of sunscreen products.",
keywords = "Correlation, In vitro test, In vivo test, SPF",
author = "Sheu, {Ming Thau} and Lin, {Cheng Wen} and Huang, {Ming Chuan} and Shen, {Chao Hui} and Ho, {Hsiu O.}",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "128--132",
journal = "Journal of Food and Drug Analysis",
issn = "1021-9498",
publisher = "Elsevier Taiwan LLC",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correlation of in vivo and in vitro measurements of sun protection factor

AU - Sheu, Ming Thau

AU - Lin, Cheng Wen

AU - Huang, Ming Chuan

AU - Shen, Chao Hui

AU - Ho, Hsiu O.

PY - 2003/6

Y1 - 2003/6

N2 - In this study, the correlation of measuring sun protection factor (SPF) values between in vivo and in vitro tests was investigated for the purpose of monitoring the in vivo efficacy of sunscreen products using in vitro tests instead of in vivo tests to lessen the labor burden. Eight products, including standard product of the US FDA (SPF 4) and COLIPA (SPF 15) and six commercial products, were included for comparison. For the in vivo test, the test sample was evenly applied to the skin at a concentration of 2 mg/cm2 using a finger stall. The lag time between application and UV irradiation was about 15 min. A Multiport UV Solar Simulator with six outputs was used as the UV source. Six test sites were exposed to UV irradiation with a progression of UV doses of 25% from output to output. The minimal erythemal dose (MED) was assessed visually after 24 hr of UV exposure. During the in vitro test, each sunscreen was evenly spread on 3M Transpore® tape and the transmittance was measured with a UV transmittance analyzer equipped with a single-flash xenon lamp. The results demonstrated that the SPF values of the in vivo tests were close to the claimed value, indicating that SPF values measured in this study were reliable. However, statistical analysis by t-test or ANOVA showed that significant difference in SPF values existed between in vivo and in vitro tests for most products. Thus, a correlation of SPF measurement between in vitro and in vivo tests could not be constructed. According to these results, using a UV transmittance analyzer to measure SPF values is not a reliable method to correlate with the results of in vivo tests, and so this is not a practical way to monitor the effectiveness of sunscreen products.

AB - In this study, the correlation of measuring sun protection factor (SPF) values between in vivo and in vitro tests was investigated for the purpose of monitoring the in vivo efficacy of sunscreen products using in vitro tests instead of in vivo tests to lessen the labor burden. Eight products, including standard product of the US FDA (SPF 4) and COLIPA (SPF 15) and six commercial products, were included for comparison. For the in vivo test, the test sample was evenly applied to the skin at a concentration of 2 mg/cm2 using a finger stall. The lag time between application and UV irradiation was about 15 min. A Multiport UV Solar Simulator with six outputs was used as the UV source. Six test sites were exposed to UV irradiation with a progression of UV doses of 25% from output to output. The minimal erythemal dose (MED) was assessed visually after 24 hr of UV exposure. During the in vitro test, each sunscreen was evenly spread on 3M Transpore® tape and the transmittance was measured with a UV transmittance analyzer equipped with a single-flash xenon lamp. The results demonstrated that the SPF values of the in vivo tests were close to the claimed value, indicating that SPF values measured in this study were reliable. However, statistical analysis by t-test or ANOVA showed that significant difference in SPF values existed between in vivo and in vitro tests for most products. Thus, a correlation of SPF measurement between in vitro and in vivo tests could not be constructed. According to these results, using a UV transmittance analyzer to measure SPF values is not a reliable method to correlate with the results of in vivo tests, and so this is not a practical way to monitor the effectiveness of sunscreen products.

KW - Correlation

KW - In vitro test

KW - In vivo test

KW - SPF

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042475198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042475198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 128

EP - 132

JO - Journal of Food and Drug Analysis

JF - Journal of Food and Drug Analysis

SN - 1021-9498

IS - 2

ER -