Computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version after total hip replacement - A precision study using synthetic and real radiographs

Chen Kun Liaw, Tai Yin Wu, Sheng Mou Hou, Rong Sen Yang, Kao Shang Shih, Chiou Shann Fuh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Previous work by our group to address the problem of acetabular positioning based on 2D methods resulted in the development of a measurement method with better precision-Liaw's version. This method may help the early diagnosis of acetabular loosening. In the present study, we hypothesized that our computerized ellipse method could improve the precision of measuring acetabular version. Methods: We developed our Elliversion software to measure acetabular version. Using total hip replacement (THR) Simulator, 96 radiographs were synthesized with random femoral inclination and 5°to 52°version, half with the femoral head included and half without. These synthetic radiographs and 28 real radiographs were measured with both Elliversion and the trigonometric method twice by one of the authors with a one-week interval between measurements. We then calculated the difference in the repeated measurements. Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis of the measuring error and inter-measurement difference. Results: In the precision study, for synthetic radiographs including the femoral head, the ellipse method was significantly better than the trigonometric method (p < 0.01). For synthetic radiographs without the femoral head, there was no significant difference between the ellipse method and the trigonometric method (p = 0.19). As for the repeated measurements, for synthetic radiographs including the femoral head, the ellipse method was significantly better than the trigonometric method (p = 0.001), whereas for synthetic radiographs without the femoral head, there was no significant difference between the two methods (p = 0.17). For real radiographs, there was no significant difference between the two measuring methods (p = 0.12). However, if we excluded the four poor-quality radiographs, there was a significant difference between the two measuring methods (p = 0.04). Discussion: We developed a computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version on synthetic radiographs and good-quality real radiographs. This method is characterized by its superior precision as compared to the trigonometric method. With the 2D standardized method (Liaw's version), improving the precision of measurement will help earlier diagnosis of acetabular loosening.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-200
Number of pages6
JournalComputer Aided Surgery
Volume18
Issue number5-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 4 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hip Replacement Arthroplasties
Thigh
Statistical methods
Simulators
Students
Early Diagnosis

Keywords

  • Acetabular anteversion
  • Acetabular version
  • Computer aided measurement
  • Total hip arthroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version after total hip replacement - A precision study using synthetic and real radiographs. / Liaw, Chen Kun; Wu, Tai Yin; Hou, Sheng Mou; Yang, Rong Sen; Shih, Kao Shang; Fuh, Chiou Shann.

In: Computer Aided Surgery, Vol. 18, No. 5-6, 04.11.2013, p. 195-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Liaw, Chen Kun ; Wu, Tai Yin ; Hou, Sheng Mou ; Yang, Rong Sen ; Shih, Kao Shang ; Fuh, Chiou Shann. / Computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version after total hip replacement - A precision study using synthetic and real radiographs. In: Computer Aided Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 18, No. 5-6. pp. 195-200.
@article{61a3385eb6ce4260bd53cd589d13de39,
title = "Computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version after total hip replacement - A precision study using synthetic and real radiographs",
abstract = "Background: Previous work by our group to address the problem of acetabular positioning based on 2D methods resulted in the development of a measurement method with better precision-Liaw's version. This method may help the early diagnosis of acetabular loosening. In the present study, we hypothesized that our computerized ellipse method could improve the precision of measuring acetabular version. Methods: We developed our Elliversion software to measure acetabular version. Using total hip replacement (THR) Simulator, 96 radiographs were synthesized with random femoral inclination and 5°to 52°version, half with the femoral head included and half without. These synthetic radiographs and 28 real radiographs were measured with both Elliversion and the trigonometric method twice by one of the authors with a one-week interval between measurements. We then calculated the difference in the repeated measurements. Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis of the measuring error and inter-measurement difference. Results: In the precision study, for synthetic radiographs including the femoral head, the ellipse method was significantly better than the trigonometric method (p < 0.01). For synthetic radiographs without the femoral head, there was no significant difference between the ellipse method and the trigonometric method (p = 0.19). As for the repeated measurements, for synthetic radiographs including the femoral head, the ellipse method was significantly better than the trigonometric method (p = 0.001), whereas for synthetic radiographs without the femoral head, there was no significant difference between the two methods (p = 0.17). For real radiographs, there was no significant difference between the two measuring methods (p = 0.12). However, if we excluded the four poor-quality radiographs, there was a significant difference between the two measuring methods (p = 0.04). Discussion: We developed a computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version on synthetic radiographs and good-quality real radiographs. This method is characterized by its superior precision as compared to the trigonometric method. With the 2D standardized method (Liaw's version), improving the precision of measurement will help earlier diagnosis of acetabular loosening.",
keywords = "Acetabular anteversion, Acetabular version, Computer aided measurement, Total hip arthroplasty",
author = "Liaw, {Chen Kun} and Wu, {Tai Yin} and Hou, {Sheng Mou} and Yang, {Rong Sen} and Shih, {Kao Shang} and Fuh, {Chiou Shann}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "4",
doi = "10.3109/10929088.2013.779749",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "195--200",
journal = "Computer Assisted Surgery",
issn = "1092-9088",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5-6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version after total hip replacement - A precision study using synthetic and real radiographs

AU - Liaw, Chen Kun

AU - Wu, Tai Yin

AU - Hou, Sheng Mou

AU - Yang, Rong Sen

AU - Shih, Kao Shang

AU - Fuh, Chiou Shann

PY - 2013/11/4

Y1 - 2013/11/4

N2 - Background: Previous work by our group to address the problem of acetabular positioning based on 2D methods resulted in the development of a measurement method with better precision-Liaw's version. This method may help the early diagnosis of acetabular loosening. In the present study, we hypothesized that our computerized ellipse method could improve the precision of measuring acetabular version. Methods: We developed our Elliversion software to measure acetabular version. Using total hip replacement (THR) Simulator, 96 radiographs were synthesized with random femoral inclination and 5°to 52°version, half with the femoral head included and half without. These synthetic radiographs and 28 real radiographs were measured with both Elliversion and the trigonometric method twice by one of the authors with a one-week interval between measurements. We then calculated the difference in the repeated measurements. Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis of the measuring error and inter-measurement difference. Results: In the precision study, for synthetic radiographs including the femoral head, the ellipse method was significantly better than the trigonometric method (p < 0.01). For synthetic radiographs without the femoral head, there was no significant difference between the ellipse method and the trigonometric method (p = 0.19). As for the repeated measurements, for synthetic radiographs including the femoral head, the ellipse method was significantly better than the trigonometric method (p = 0.001), whereas for synthetic radiographs without the femoral head, there was no significant difference between the two methods (p = 0.17). For real radiographs, there was no significant difference between the two measuring methods (p = 0.12). However, if we excluded the four poor-quality radiographs, there was a significant difference between the two measuring methods (p = 0.04). Discussion: We developed a computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version on synthetic radiographs and good-quality real radiographs. This method is characterized by its superior precision as compared to the trigonometric method. With the 2D standardized method (Liaw's version), improving the precision of measurement will help earlier diagnosis of acetabular loosening.

AB - Background: Previous work by our group to address the problem of acetabular positioning based on 2D methods resulted in the development of a measurement method with better precision-Liaw's version. This method may help the early diagnosis of acetabular loosening. In the present study, we hypothesized that our computerized ellipse method could improve the precision of measuring acetabular version. Methods: We developed our Elliversion software to measure acetabular version. Using total hip replacement (THR) Simulator, 96 radiographs were synthesized with random femoral inclination and 5°to 52°version, half with the femoral head included and half without. These synthetic radiographs and 28 real radiographs were measured with both Elliversion and the trigonometric method twice by one of the authors with a one-week interval between measurements. We then calculated the difference in the repeated measurements. Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis of the measuring error and inter-measurement difference. Results: In the precision study, for synthetic radiographs including the femoral head, the ellipse method was significantly better than the trigonometric method (p < 0.01). For synthetic radiographs without the femoral head, there was no significant difference between the ellipse method and the trigonometric method (p = 0.19). As for the repeated measurements, for synthetic radiographs including the femoral head, the ellipse method was significantly better than the trigonometric method (p = 0.001), whereas for synthetic radiographs without the femoral head, there was no significant difference between the two methods (p = 0.17). For real radiographs, there was no significant difference between the two measuring methods (p = 0.12). However, if we excluded the four poor-quality radiographs, there was a significant difference between the two measuring methods (p = 0.04). Discussion: We developed a computerized ellipse method for measuring acetabular version on synthetic radiographs and good-quality real radiographs. This method is characterized by its superior precision as compared to the trigonometric method. With the 2D standardized method (Liaw's version), improving the precision of measurement will help earlier diagnosis of acetabular loosening.

KW - Acetabular anteversion

KW - Acetabular version

KW - Computer aided measurement

KW - Total hip arthroplasty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886689277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886689277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/10929088.2013.779749

DO - 10.3109/10929088.2013.779749

M3 - Article

C2 - 23528151

AN - SCOPUS:84886689277

VL - 18

SP - 195

EP - 200

JO - Computer Assisted Surgery

JF - Computer Assisted Surgery

SN - 1092-9088

IS - 5-6

ER -