Computer-aided system of evaluation for population-based all-in-one service screening (CASE-PASS): From study design to outcome analysis with bias adjustment

Li Sheng Chen, Amy Ming Fang Yen, Stephen W. Duffy, Laszlo Tabar, Wen Chou Lin, Hsiu Hsi Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Population-based routine service screening has gained popularity following an era of randomized controlled trials. The evaluation of these service screening programs is subject to study design, data availability, and the precise data analysis for adjusting bias. We developed a computer-aided system that allows the evaluation of population-based service screening to unify these aspects and facilitate and guide the program assessor to efficiently perform an evaluation. Methods: This system underpins two experimental designs: the posttest-only non-equivalent design and the one-group pretest-posttest design and demonstrates the type of data required at both the population and individual levels. Three major analyses were developed that included a cumulative mortality analysis, survival analysis with lead-time adjustment, and self-selection bias adjustment. We used SAS AF software to develop a graphic interface system with a pull-down menu style. Results: We demonstrate the application of this system with data obtained from a Swedish population-based service screen and a population-based randomized controlled trial for the screening of breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer, and one service screening program for cervical cancer with Pap smears. The system provided automated descriptive results based on the various sources of available data and cumulative mortality curves corresponding to the study designs. The comparison of cumulative survival between clinically and screen-detected cases without a lead-time adjustment are also demonstrated. The intention-to-treat and noncompliance analysis with self-selection bias adjustments are also shown to assess the effectiveness of the population-based service screening program. Model validation was composed of a comparison between our adjusted self-selection bias estimates and the empirical results on effectiveness reported in the literature. Conclusions: We demonstrate a computer-aided system allowing the evaluation of population-based service screening programs with an adjustment for self-selection and lead-time bias. This is achieved by providing a tutorial guide from the study design to the data analysis, with bias adjustment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)786-796
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Epidemiology
Volume20
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Computer Systems
Selection Bias
Population
Randomized Controlled Trials
Papanicolaou Test
Intention to Treat Analysis
Mortality
Information Storage and Retrieval
Survival Analysis
Information Systems
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Colorectal Neoplasms
Prostatic Neoplasms
Research Design
Software
Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Computer-aided System
  • Lead Time
  • Population-based Screening
  • Quasi-Experimental Design
  • Self-Selection Bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Computer-aided system of evaluation for population-based all-in-one service screening (CASE-PASS) : From study design to outcome analysis with bias adjustment. / Chen, Li Sheng; Yen, Amy Ming Fang; Duffy, Stephen W.; Tabar, Laszlo; Lin, Wen Chou; Chen, Hsiu Hsi.

In: Annals of Epidemiology, Vol. 20, No. 10, 2010, p. 786-796.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{082ef85d3b224b0db8267f06846b1f7b,
title = "Computer-aided system of evaluation for population-based all-in-one service screening (CASE-PASS): From study design to outcome analysis with bias adjustment",
abstract = "Purpose: Population-based routine service screening has gained popularity following an era of randomized controlled trials. The evaluation of these service screening programs is subject to study design, data availability, and the precise data analysis for adjusting bias. We developed a computer-aided system that allows the evaluation of population-based service screening to unify these aspects and facilitate and guide the program assessor to efficiently perform an evaluation. Methods: This system underpins two experimental designs: the posttest-only non-equivalent design and the one-group pretest-posttest design and demonstrates the type of data required at both the population and individual levels. Three major analyses were developed that included a cumulative mortality analysis, survival analysis with lead-time adjustment, and self-selection bias adjustment. We used SAS AF software to develop a graphic interface system with a pull-down menu style. Results: We demonstrate the application of this system with data obtained from a Swedish population-based service screen and a population-based randomized controlled trial for the screening of breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer, and one service screening program for cervical cancer with Pap smears. The system provided automated descriptive results based on the various sources of available data and cumulative mortality curves corresponding to the study designs. The comparison of cumulative survival between clinically and screen-detected cases without a lead-time adjustment are also demonstrated. The intention-to-treat and noncompliance analysis with self-selection bias adjustments are also shown to assess the effectiveness of the population-based service screening program. Model validation was composed of a comparison between our adjusted self-selection bias estimates and the empirical results on effectiveness reported in the literature. Conclusions: We demonstrate a computer-aided system allowing the evaluation of population-based service screening programs with an adjustment for self-selection and lead-time bias. This is achieved by providing a tutorial guide from the study design to the data analysis, with bias adjustment.",
keywords = "Computer-aided System, Lead Time, Population-based Screening, Quasi-Experimental Design, Self-Selection Bias",
author = "Chen, {Li Sheng} and Yen, {Amy Ming Fang} and Duffy, {Stephen W.} and Laszlo Tabar and Lin, {Wen Chou} and Chen, {Hsiu Hsi}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.06.003",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "786--796",
journal = "Annals of Epidemiology",
issn = "1047-2797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computer-aided system of evaluation for population-based all-in-one service screening (CASE-PASS)

T2 - From study design to outcome analysis with bias adjustment

AU - Chen, Li Sheng

AU - Yen, Amy Ming Fang

AU - Duffy, Stephen W.

AU - Tabar, Laszlo

AU - Lin, Wen Chou

AU - Chen, Hsiu Hsi

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Purpose: Population-based routine service screening has gained popularity following an era of randomized controlled trials. The evaluation of these service screening programs is subject to study design, data availability, and the precise data analysis for adjusting bias. We developed a computer-aided system that allows the evaluation of population-based service screening to unify these aspects and facilitate and guide the program assessor to efficiently perform an evaluation. Methods: This system underpins two experimental designs: the posttest-only non-equivalent design and the one-group pretest-posttest design and demonstrates the type of data required at both the population and individual levels. Three major analyses were developed that included a cumulative mortality analysis, survival analysis with lead-time adjustment, and self-selection bias adjustment. We used SAS AF software to develop a graphic interface system with a pull-down menu style. Results: We demonstrate the application of this system with data obtained from a Swedish population-based service screen and a population-based randomized controlled trial for the screening of breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer, and one service screening program for cervical cancer with Pap smears. The system provided automated descriptive results based on the various sources of available data and cumulative mortality curves corresponding to the study designs. The comparison of cumulative survival between clinically and screen-detected cases without a lead-time adjustment are also demonstrated. The intention-to-treat and noncompliance analysis with self-selection bias adjustments are also shown to assess the effectiveness of the population-based service screening program. Model validation was composed of a comparison between our adjusted self-selection bias estimates and the empirical results on effectiveness reported in the literature. Conclusions: We demonstrate a computer-aided system allowing the evaluation of population-based service screening programs with an adjustment for self-selection and lead-time bias. This is achieved by providing a tutorial guide from the study design to the data analysis, with bias adjustment.

AB - Purpose: Population-based routine service screening has gained popularity following an era of randomized controlled trials. The evaluation of these service screening programs is subject to study design, data availability, and the precise data analysis for adjusting bias. We developed a computer-aided system that allows the evaluation of population-based service screening to unify these aspects and facilitate and guide the program assessor to efficiently perform an evaluation. Methods: This system underpins two experimental designs: the posttest-only non-equivalent design and the one-group pretest-posttest design and demonstrates the type of data required at both the population and individual levels. Three major analyses were developed that included a cumulative mortality analysis, survival analysis with lead-time adjustment, and self-selection bias adjustment. We used SAS AF software to develop a graphic interface system with a pull-down menu style. Results: We demonstrate the application of this system with data obtained from a Swedish population-based service screen and a population-based randomized controlled trial for the screening of breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer, and one service screening program for cervical cancer with Pap smears. The system provided automated descriptive results based on the various sources of available data and cumulative mortality curves corresponding to the study designs. The comparison of cumulative survival between clinically and screen-detected cases without a lead-time adjustment are also demonstrated. The intention-to-treat and noncompliance analysis with self-selection bias adjustments are also shown to assess the effectiveness of the population-based service screening program. Model validation was composed of a comparison between our adjusted self-selection bias estimates and the empirical results on effectiveness reported in the literature. Conclusions: We demonstrate a computer-aided system allowing the evaluation of population-based service screening programs with an adjustment for self-selection and lead-time bias. This is achieved by providing a tutorial guide from the study design to the data analysis, with bias adjustment.

KW - Computer-aided System

KW - Lead Time

KW - Population-based Screening

KW - Quasi-Experimental Design

KW - Self-Selection Bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956260374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956260374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.06.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 20816316

AN - SCOPUS:77956260374

VL - 20

SP - 786

EP - 796

JO - Annals of Epidemiology

JF - Annals of Epidemiology

SN - 1047-2797

IS - 10

ER -