Comparisons of the brief form of the world health organization quality of life and short form-36 for persons with spinal cord injuries

Mau Roung Lin, Hei Fen Hwang, Chih Yi Chen, Wen Ta Chiu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the psychometric performance of the brief form of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) with the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries in Taiwan. DESIGN: From a nationwide registry of traumatic spinal cord injuries, 187 subjects completed telephone interviews. Score distributions, internal consistency, intrainterviewer and interinterviewer test-retest reliabilities, convergent and known-groups validities, and the responsiveness between the WHOQOL-BREF (with an overall quality-of-life facet and four domains) and the SF-36 (with eight domains) were compared. RESULTS: Both the WHOQOL-BREF and the SF-36 exhibited low missing values (0.9 ∼ 7.7 vs. 2.1 ∼ 3.8), very good internal consistencies (Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.75 ∼ 0.87 vs. 0.72 ∼ 0.98), intrainterviewer reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.84 ∼ 0.98 vs. 0.71 ∼ 0.99) and responsive statistics (0.787 ∼ 1.83 vs. 0 ∼ 0.92), and fair interinterviewer reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.56 ∼ 0.95 vs. 0.41 ∼ 0.98), whereas the WHOQOL-BREF's domains converged with the conceptually related domains of the SF-36. Nonetheless, compared with the SF-36, the WHOQOL-BREF had lower percentages of ceiling (0.0% ∼ 0.4% vs. 0.4% ∼ 63.8%) and floor (0.0% ∼ 1.3% vs. 0.4% ∼ 28.1%) values and better known-groups validity and responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The WHOQOL-BREF is an appropriate generic health-related quality of life measure for persons with traumatic spinal cord injuries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-113
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume86
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2007

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Injuries
Quality of Life
Taiwan
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Registries
Interviews

Keywords

  • Quality of Life
  • SF-36
  • Spinal Cord Injury
  • Taiwan
  • WHOQOL-BREF

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Comparisons of the brief form of the world health organization quality of life and short form-36 for persons with spinal cord injuries. / Lin, Mau Roung; Hwang, Hei Fen; Chen, Chih Yi; Chiu, Wen Ta.

In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 86, No. 2, 02.2007, p. 104-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1d15b6a64b43430b82a36bbb96f72ee5,
title = "Comparisons of the brief form of the world health organization quality of life and short form-36 for persons with spinal cord injuries",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: This study compared the psychometric performance of the brief form of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) with the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries in Taiwan. DESIGN: From a nationwide registry of traumatic spinal cord injuries, 187 subjects completed telephone interviews. Score distributions, internal consistency, intrainterviewer and interinterviewer test-retest reliabilities, convergent and known-groups validities, and the responsiveness between the WHOQOL-BREF (with an overall quality-of-life facet and four domains) and the SF-36 (with eight domains) were compared. RESULTS: Both the WHOQOL-BREF and the SF-36 exhibited low missing values (0.9 ∼ 7.7 vs. 2.1 ∼ 3.8), very good internal consistencies (Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.75 ∼ 0.87 vs. 0.72 ∼ 0.98), intrainterviewer reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.84 ∼ 0.98 vs. 0.71 ∼ 0.99) and responsive statistics (0.787 ∼ 1.83 vs. 0 ∼ 0.92), and fair interinterviewer reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.56 ∼ 0.95 vs. 0.41 ∼ 0.98), whereas the WHOQOL-BREF's domains converged with the conceptually related domains of the SF-36. Nonetheless, compared with the SF-36, the WHOQOL-BREF had lower percentages of ceiling (0.0{\%} ∼ 0.4{\%} vs. 0.4{\%} ∼ 63.8{\%}) and floor (0.0{\%} ∼ 1.3{\%} vs. 0.4{\%} ∼ 28.1{\%}) values and better known-groups validity and responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The WHOQOL-BREF is an appropriate generic health-related quality of life measure for persons with traumatic spinal cord injuries.",
keywords = "Quality of Life, SF-36, Spinal Cord Injury, Taiwan, WHOQOL-BREF",
author = "Lin, {Mau Roung} and Hwang, {Hei Fen} and Chen, {Chih Yi} and Chiu, {Wen Ta}",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/01.phm.0000247780.64373.0e",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "104--113",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparisons of the brief form of the world health organization quality of life and short form-36 for persons with spinal cord injuries

AU - Lin, Mau Roung

AU - Hwang, Hei Fen

AU - Chen, Chih Yi

AU - Chiu, Wen Ta

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE: This study compared the psychometric performance of the brief form of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) with the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries in Taiwan. DESIGN: From a nationwide registry of traumatic spinal cord injuries, 187 subjects completed telephone interviews. Score distributions, internal consistency, intrainterviewer and interinterviewer test-retest reliabilities, convergent and known-groups validities, and the responsiveness between the WHOQOL-BREF (with an overall quality-of-life facet and four domains) and the SF-36 (with eight domains) were compared. RESULTS: Both the WHOQOL-BREF and the SF-36 exhibited low missing values (0.9 ∼ 7.7 vs. 2.1 ∼ 3.8), very good internal consistencies (Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.75 ∼ 0.87 vs. 0.72 ∼ 0.98), intrainterviewer reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.84 ∼ 0.98 vs. 0.71 ∼ 0.99) and responsive statistics (0.787 ∼ 1.83 vs. 0 ∼ 0.92), and fair interinterviewer reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.56 ∼ 0.95 vs. 0.41 ∼ 0.98), whereas the WHOQOL-BREF's domains converged with the conceptually related domains of the SF-36. Nonetheless, compared with the SF-36, the WHOQOL-BREF had lower percentages of ceiling (0.0% ∼ 0.4% vs. 0.4% ∼ 63.8%) and floor (0.0% ∼ 1.3% vs. 0.4% ∼ 28.1%) values and better known-groups validity and responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The WHOQOL-BREF is an appropriate generic health-related quality of life measure for persons with traumatic spinal cord injuries.

AB - OBJECTIVE: This study compared the psychometric performance of the brief form of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) with the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries in Taiwan. DESIGN: From a nationwide registry of traumatic spinal cord injuries, 187 subjects completed telephone interviews. Score distributions, internal consistency, intrainterviewer and interinterviewer test-retest reliabilities, convergent and known-groups validities, and the responsiveness between the WHOQOL-BREF (with an overall quality-of-life facet and four domains) and the SF-36 (with eight domains) were compared. RESULTS: Both the WHOQOL-BREF and the SF-36 exhibited low missing values (0.9 ∼ 7.7 vs. 2.1 ∼ 3.8), very good internal consistencies (Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.75 ∼ 0.87 vs. 0.72 ∼ 0.98), intrainterviewer reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.84 ∼ 0.98 vs. 0.71 ∼ 0.99) and responsive statistics (0.787 ∼ 1.83 vs. 0 ∼ 0.92), and fair interinterviewer reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.56 ∼ 0.95 vs. 0.41 ∼ 0.98), whereas the WHOQOL-BREF's domains converged with the conceptually related domains of the SF-36. Nonetheless, compared with the SF-36, the WHOQOL-BREF had lower percentages of ceiling (0.0% ∼ 0.4% vs. 0.4% ∼ 63.8%) and floor (0.0% ∼ 1.3% vs. 0.4% ∼ 28.1%) values and better known-groups validity and responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The WHOQOL-BREF is an appropriate generic health-related quality of life measure for persons with traumatic spinal cord injuries.

KW - Quality of Life

KW - SF-36

KW - Spinal Cord Injury

KW - Taiwan

KW - WHOQOL-BREF

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846424251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846424251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.phm.0000247780.64373.0e

DO - 10.1097/01.phm.0000247780.64373.0e

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 104

EP - 113

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 2

ER -