Comparison of the clinical presentations of ingested foreign bodies requiring operative and nonoperative management

Chi Hsun Hsieh, Yu Chun Wang, Ray Jade Chen, Jen Feng Fang, Being Chuan Lin, Yu Pao Hsu, Jung Liang Kao, Yi Chin Kao, Po Chin Yu, Shih Ching Kang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Foreign body ingestion is commonly seen in emergency departments. Although most cases have a clear history, foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract can be an unexpected finding after operations for other conditions. This study compares the clinical presentations and outcomes for patients requiring or not requiring operations. Between January 1998 and December 2001, 80 patients with foreign body ingestion were included and divided into two groups. Specifically, group 1 patients were managed nonoperatively, and group 2 patients were managed operatively. The patient demographics, symptoms, foreign body ingestion mechanisms, type of diagnostic studies and management, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Group 1 contained 44 patients, and group 2 contained 36 patients. Group 1 patients were significantly younger, but the incidence of underlying disease and the proportion of patients who ingested foreign bodies intentionally or incidentally was similar in groups 1 and 2. Most of the ingested foreign bodies in group 1 were in the esophagus and stomach, but for group 2 patients they were mostly in the small bowel. Moreover, most of group 1 patients were asymptomatic, which was not the case in group 2. Most group 2 patients had no known history of foreign body ingestion, and diagnoses generally were established during surgery. Neither group of patients displayed any mortality. Nonoperative management of foreign body ingestion usually can succeed in asymptomatic patients with a clear history; however, ingested foreign bodies can cause serious problems for those patients without a clear history of foreign body ingestion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-102
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Surgery
Volume90
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Foreign Bodies
Eating
History
Esophagus
Gastrointestinal Tract
Hospital Emergency Service
Stomach

Keywords

  • Abdominal injuries
  • Endoscopy
  • Foreign bodies
  • Intestinal perforation
  • Peritonitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Hsieh, C. H., Wang, Y. C., Chen, R. J., Fang, J. F., Lin, B. C., Hsu, Y. P., ... Kang, S. C. (2005). Comparison of the clinical presentations of ingested foreign bodies requiring operative and nonoperative management. International Surgery, 90(2), 99-102.

Comparison of the clinical presentations of ingested foreign bodies requiring operative and nonoperative management. / Hsieh, Chi Hsun; Wang, Yu Chun; Chen, Ray Jade; Fang, Jen Feng; Lin, Being Chuan; Hsu, Yu Pao; Kao, Jung Liang; Kao, Yi Chin; Yu, Po Chin; Kang, Shih Ching.

In: International Surgery, Vol. 90, No. 2, 04.2005, p. 99-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hsieh, CH, Wang, YC, Chen, RJ, Fang, JF, Lin, BC, Hsu, YP, Kao, JL, Kao, YC, Yu, PC & Kang, SC 2005, 'Comparison of the clinical presentations of ingested foreign bodies requiring operative and nonoperative management', International Surgery, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 99-102.
Hsieh, Chi Hsun ; Wang, Yu Chun ; Chen, Ray Jade ; Fang, Jen Feng ; Lin, Being Chuan ; Hsu, Yu Pao ; Kao, Jung Liang ; Kao, Yi Chin ; Yu, Po Chin ; Kang, Shih Ching. / Comparison of the clinical presentations of ingested foreign bodies requiring operative and nonoperative management. In: International Surgery. 2005 ; Vol. 90, No. 2. pp. 99-102.
@article{00510054e44145fcb9e92afc2d310232,
title = "Comparison of the clinical presentations of ingested foreign bodies requiring operative and nonoperative management",
abstract = "Foreign body ingestion is commonly seen in emergency departments. Although most cases have a clear history, foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract can be an unexpected finding after operations for other conditions. This study compares the clinical presentations and outcomes for patients requiring or not requiring operations. Between January 1998 and December 2001, 80 patients with foreign body ingestion were included and divided into two groups. Specifically, group 1 patients were managed nonoperatively, and group 2 patients were managed operatively. The patient demographics, symptoms, foreign body ingestion mechanisms, type of diagnostic studies and management, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Group 1 contained 44 patients, and group 2 contained 36 patients. Group 1 patients were significantly younger, but the incidence of underlying disease and the proportion of patients who ingested foreign bodies intentionally or incidentally was similar in groups 1 and 2. Most of the ingested foreign bodies in group 1 were in the esophagus and stomach, but for group 2 patients they were mostly in the small bowel. Moreover, most of group 1 patients were asymptomatic, which was not the case in group 2. Most group 2 patients had no known history of foreign body ingestion, and diagnoses generally were established during surgery. Neither group of patients displayed any mortality. Nonoperative management of foreign body ingestion usually can succeed in asymptomatic patients with a clear history; however, ingested foreign bodies can cause serious problems for those patients without a clear history of foreign body ingestion.",
keywords = "Abdominal injuries, Endoscopy, Foreign bodies, Intestinal perforation, Peritonitis",
author = "Hsieh, {Chi Hsun} and Wang, {Yu Chun} and Chen, {Ray Jade} and Fang, {Jen Feng} and Lin, {Being Chuan} and Hsu, {Yu Pao} and Kao, {Jung Liang} and Kao, {Yi Chin} and Yu, {Po Chin} and Kang, {Shih Ching}",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
pages = "99--102",
journal = "International Surgery",
issn = "0020-8868",
publisher = "International College of Surgeons",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the clinical presentations of ingested foreign bodies requiring operative and nonoperative management

AU - Hsieh, Chi Hsun

AU - Wang, Yu Chun

AU - Chen, Ray Jade

AU - Fang, Jen Feng

AU - Lin, Being Chuan

AU - Hsu, Yu Pao

AU - Kao, Jung Liang

AU - Kao, Yi Chin

AU - Yu, Po Chin

AU - Kang, Shih Ching

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - Foreign body ingestion is commonly seen in emergency departments. Although most cases have a clear history, foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract can be an unexpected finding after operations for other conditions. This study compares the clinical presentations and outcomes for patients requiring or not requiring operations. Between January 1998 and December 2001, 80 patients with foreign body ingestion were included and divided into two groups. Specifically, group 1 patients were managed nonoperatively, and group 2 patients were managed operatively. The patient demographics, symptoms, foreign body ingestion mechanisms, type of diagnostic studies and management, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Group 1 contained 44 patients, and group 2 contained 36 patients. Group 1 patients were significantly younger, but the incidence of underlying disease and the proportion of patients who ingested foreign bodies intentionally or incidentally was similar in groups 1 and 2. Most of the ingested foreign bodies in group 1 were in the esophagus and stomach, but for group 2 patients they were mostly in the small bowel. Moreover, most of group 1 patients were asymptomatic, which was not the case in group 2. Most group 2 patients had no known history of foreign body ingestion, and diagnoses generally were established during surgery. Neither group of patients displayed any mortality. Nonoperative management of foreign body ingestion usually can succeed in asymptomatic patients with a clear history; however, ingested foreign bodies can cause serious problems for those patients without a clear history of foreign body ingestion.

AB - Foreign body ingestion is commonly seen in emergency departments. Although most cases have a clear history, foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract can be an unexpected finding after operations for other conditions. This study compares the clinical presentations and outcomes for patients requiring or not requiring operations. Between January 1998 and December 2001, 80 patients with foreign body ingestion were included and divided into two groups. Specifically, group 1 patients were managed nonoperatively, and group 2 patients were managed operatively. The patient demographics, symptoms, foreign body ingestion mechanisms, type of diagnostic studies and management, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Group 1 contained 44 patients, and group 2 contained 36 patients. Group 1 patients were significantly younger, but the incidence of underlying disease and the proportion of patients who ingested foreign bodies intentionally or incidentally was similar in groups 1 and 2. Most of the ingested foreign bodies in group 1 were in the esophagus and stomach, but for group 2 patients they were mostly in the small bowel. Moreover, most of group 1 patients were asymptomatic, which was not the case in group 2. Most group 2 patients had no known history of foreign body ingestion, and diagnoses generally were established during surgery. Neither group of patients displayed any mortality. Nonoperative management of foreign body ingestion usually can succeed in asymptomatic patients with a clear history; however, ingested foreign bodies can cause serious problems for those patients without a clear history of foreign body ingestion.

KW - Abdominal injuries

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Foreign bodies

KW - Intestinal perforation

KW - Peritonitis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23044437068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23044437068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 99

EP - 102

JO - International Surgery

JF - International Surgery

SN - 0020-8868

IS - 2

ER -