Comparison of the accuracies of transpedicular screw insertion during computed tomography-free, -based, and intraoperative computed tomography spinal surgeries

Meng Huang Wu, Tsung Jen Huang, Yen Yao Li, Chin Chang Cheng, Kuo Chin Huang, Robert Wen Wei Hsu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to compare the accuracies of transpedicular screw (TPS) insertion using with computed tomography (CT)-free, CT-based, and intraoperative CT (iCT) with integrated navigation during lumbar spinal surgery. Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study comparing perioperative data from three patient groups-CT-free navigation (CTF) group, CT-based navigation (CTB) group, andiCT group-who were treated at the Orthopedic Department of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan. Patients who received posterior lumbar TPS insertion with the assistance of computer navigation from January 2002 to June 2011 were included in the study. All demographic and perioperative data were collected from reviews of the medical charts. Postoperative CT images were reviewed to determine screw position. Results: This study enrolled 56 patients: 22 patients were enrolled in the CTF group (106 screws), 15 patients in the CTB group (70 screws), and 19 patients in the iCT group (114 screws). The rate of screw insertion without pedicle wall penetration was 89.62% in the CTF group, 98% in the CTB group, and 98% in the iCT group. (. p = 0.01) The rate of pedicle wall penetration >2 mm was 5.66%, 0%, and 0% in the CTF, CTB, and iCT groups, respectively. One patient in the CTF group developed a residual neurologic deficit. There were noscrew-related complications in the CTB or iCT groups. Conclusion: The use of CT navigation (CT-based and iCT navigations) results in a significantly higher accuracy of screw insertion compared with two-dimensional fluoroscopic navigation for TPS insertion (. p = 0.01). Intraoperative CT-integrated navigation provides additional advantages, including simpler registration and the ability to double-check positioning during the operation, andtends to produce less blood loss.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-42
Number of pages4
JournalFormosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tomography
Neurologic Manifestations
Taiwan
Orthopedics
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Demography

Keywords

  • ICT
  • Intraoperative computed tomography
  • Multilevel spine surgery
  • Navigation surgery
  • Transpedicular screw

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of the accuracies of transpedicular screw insertion during computed tomography-free, -based, and intraoperative computed tomography spinal surgeries. / Wu, Meng Huang; Huang, Tsung Jen; Li, Yen Yao; Cheng, Chin Chang; Huang, Kuo Chin; Hsu, Robert Wen Wei.

In: Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 3, No. 2, 05.2012, p. 39-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec156b44b9104bf9819374e924a7ac52,
title = "Comparison of the accuracies of transpedicular screw insertion during computed tomography-free, -based, and intraoperative computed tomography spinal surgeries",
abstract = "Purpose: This study aims to compare the accuracies of transpedicular screw (TPS) insertion using with computed tomography (CT)-free, CT-based, and intraoperative CT (iCT) with integrated navigation during lumbar spinal surgery. Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study comparing perioperative data from three patient groups-CT-free navigation (CTF) group, CT-based navigation (CTB) group, andiCT group-who were treated at the Orthopedic Department of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan. Patients who received posterior lumbar TPS insertion with the assistance of computer navigation from January 2002 to June 2011 were included in the study. All demographic and perioperative data were collected from reviews of the medical charts. Postoperative CT images were reviewed to determine screw position. Results: This study enrolled 56 patients: 22 patients were enrolled in the CTF group (106 screws), 15 patients in the CTB group (70 screws), and 19 patients in the iCT group (114 screws). The rate of screw insertion without pedicle wall penetration was 89.62{\%} in the CTF group, 98{\%} in the CTB group, and 98{\%} in the iCT group. (. p = 0.01) The rate of pedicle wall penetration >2 mm was 5.66{\%}, 0{\%}, and 0{\%} in the CTF, CTB, and iCT groups, respectively. One patient in the CTF group developed a residual neurologic deficit. There were noscrew-related complications in the CTB or iCT groups. Conclusion: The use of CT navigation (CT-based and iCT navigations) results in a significantly higher accuracy of screw insertion compared with two-dimensional fluoroscopic navigation for TPS insertion (. p = 0.01). Intraoperative CT-integrated navigation provides additional advantages, including simpler registration and the ability to double-check positioning during the operation, andtends to produce less blood loss.",
keywords = "ICT, Intraoperative computed tomography, Multilevel spine surgery, Navigation surgery, Transpedicular screw",
author = "Wu, {Meng Huang} and Huang, {Tsung Jen} and Li, {Yen Yao} and Cheng, {Chin Chang} and Huang, {Kuo Chin} and Hsu, {Robert Wen Wei}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.fjmd.2012.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "39--42",
journal = "Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders",
issn = "2210-7940",
publisher = "中華民國骨科醫學會",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the accuracies of transpedicular screw insertion during computed tomography-free, -based, and intraoperative computed tomography spinal surgeries

AU - Wu, Meng Huang

AU - Huang, Tsung Jen

AU - Li, Yen Yao

AU - Cheng, Chin Chang

AU - Huang, Kuo Chin

AU - Hsu, Robert Wen Wei

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Purpose: This study aims to compare the accuracies of transpedicular screw (TPS) insertion using with computed tomography (CT)-free, CT-based, and intraoperative CT (iCT) with integrated navigation during lumbar spinal surgery. Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study comparing perioperative data from three patient groups-CT-free navigation (CTF) group, CT-based navigation (CTB) group, andiCT group-who were treated at the Orthopedic Department of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan. Patients who received posterior lumbar TPS insertion with the assistance of computer navigation from January 2002 to June 2011 were included in the study. All demographic and perioperative data were collected from reviews of the medical charts. Postoperative CT images were reviewed to determine screw position. Results: This study enrolled 56 patients: 22 patients were enrolled in the CTF group (106 screws), 15 patients in the CTB group (70 screws), and 19 patients in the iCT group (114 screws). The rate of screw insertion without pedicle wall penetration was 89.62% in the CTF group, 98% in the CTB group, and 98% in the iCT group. (. p = 0.01) The rate of pedicle wall penetration >2 mm was 5.66%, 0%, and 0% in the CTF, CTB, and iCT groups, respectively. One patient in the CTF group developed a residual neurologic deficit. There were noscrew-related complications in the CTB or iCT groups. Conclusion: The use of CT navigation (CT-based and iCT navigations) results in a significantly higher accuracy of screw insertion compared with two-dimensional fluoroscopic navigation for TPS insertion (. p = 0.01). Intraoperative CT-integrated navigation provides additional advantages, including simpler registration and the ability to double-check positioning during the operation, andtends to produce less blood loss.

AB - Purpose: This study aims to compare the accuracies of transpedicular screw (TPS) insertion using with computed tomography (CT)-free, CT-based, and intraoperative CT (iCT) with integrated navigation during lumbar spinal surgery. Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study comparing perioperative data from three patient groups-CT-free navigation (CTF) group, CT-based navigation (CTB) group, andiCT group-who were treated at the Orthopedic Department of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan. Patients who received posterior lumbar TPS insertion with the assistance of computer navigation from January 2002 to June 2011 were included in the study. All demographic and perioperative data were collected from reviews of the medical charts. Postoperative CT images were reviewed to determine screw position. Results: This study enrolled 56 patients: 22 patients were enrolled in the CTF group (106 screws), 15 patients in the CTB group (70 screws), and 19 patients in the iCT group (114 screws). The rate of screw insertion without pedicle wall penetration was 89.62% in the CTF group, 98% in the CTB group, and 98% in the iCT group. (. p = 0.01) The rate of pedicle wall penetration >2 mm was 5.66%, 0%, and 0% in the CTF, CTB, and iCT groups, respectively. One patient in the CTF group developed a residual neurologic deficit. There were noscrew-related complications in the CTB or iCT groups. Conclusion: The use of CT navigation (CT-based and iCT navigations) results in a significantly higher accuracy of screw insertion compared with two-dimensional fluoroscopic navigation for TPS insertion (. p = 0.01). Intraoperative CT-integrated navigation provides additional advantages, including simpler registration and the ability to double-check positioning during the operation, andtends to produce less blood loss.

KW - ICT

KW - Intraoperative computed tomography

KW - Multilevel spine surgery

KW - Navigation surgery

KW - Transpedicular screw

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861668439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861668439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fjmd.2012.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.fjmd.2012.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 39

EP - 42

JO - Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders

JF - Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders

SN - 2210-7940

IS - 2

ER -