Comparison of rockall and blatchford scores to assess outcome of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers after endoscopic therapy

Mu Shien Lee, Chi Liang Cheng, Nai Jen Liu, Yung Kuan Tsou, Jui-Hsiang Tang, Cheng Hui Lin, Kai Feng Sung, Ching Song Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: To determine the accuracy of Rockall and Blatchford scores for predicting outcome after endoscopic treatment in two groups of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers: those who initially presented with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding (Group A) and those who developed UGI bleeding during hospital treatment for another condition (Group B). Methodology: A total of 593 patients who had had endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcers from January 2009 to July 2010 were divided into Groups A and B. Endoscopic therapy including monotherapy (thermal therapy or hemoclipping) and combination therapy was applied. The Blatchford and complete Rockall scores for the two subgroups were calculated. Predictive statistics for the use of the two scoring systems were then compared for Groups A and B. Results: Thirty-day re-bleeding and mortality rates increased with increased Rockall and Blatchford scores. Rockall scores were more accurate than the Blatchford scores for predicting mortality. However, neither the Rockall nor the Blatchford score could accurately predict recurrence of bleeding. When the results in Group B and Group A subgroups were compared, the average Rockall score for Group A was lower than that for Group B (5.6 vs. 6.3, p <0.001). Conclusions: In high-risk patients with peptic ulcer bleeding, the Rockall score can better predict 30-day mortality than can the Blatchford score; this was particularly true for Group B patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1990-1997
Number of pages8
JournalHepato-Gastroenterology
Volume60
Issue number128
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Peptic Ulcer
Hemorrhage
Therapeutics
Mortality
Hot Temperature
Recurrence

Keywords

  • Endoscopy
  • Hematemesis
  • Hemorrhage
  • Mortality
  • Peptic ulcer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Comparison of rockall and blatchford scores to assess outcome of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers after endoscopic therapy. / Lee, Mu Shien; Cheng, Chi Liang; Liu, Nai Jen; Tsou, Yung Kuan; Tang, Jui-Hsiang; Lin, Cheng Hui; Sung, Kai Feng; Lee, Ching Song.

In: Hepato-Gastroenterology, Vol. 60, No. 128, 01.11.2013, p. 1990-1997.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Mu Shien ; Cheng, Chi Liang ; Liu, Nai Jen ; Tsou, Yung Kuan ; Tang, Jui-Hsiang ; Lin, Cheng Hui ; Sung, Kai Feng ; Lee, Ching Song. / Comparison of rockall and blatchford scores to assess outcome of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers after endoscopic therapy. In: Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2013 ; Vol. 60, No. 128. pp. 1990-1997.
@article{90b477a13275428285e58a6ddca809fb,
title = "Comparison of rockall and blatchford scores to assess outcome of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers after endoscopic therapy",
abstract = "Background/Aims: To determine the accuracy of Rockall and Blatchford scores for predicting outcome after endoscopic treatment in two groups of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers: those who initially presented with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding (Group A) and those who developed UGI bleeding during hospital treatment for another condition (Group B). Methodology: A total of 593 patients who had had endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcers from January 2009 to July 2010 were divided into Groups A and B. Endoscopic therapy including monotherapy (thermal therapy or hemoclipping) and combination therapy was applied. The Blatchford and complete Rockall scores for the two subgroups were calculated. Predictive statistics for the use of the two scoring systems were then compared for Groups A and B. Results: Thirty-day re-bleeding and mortality rates increased with increased Rockall and Blatchford scores. Rockall scores were more accurate than the Blatchford scores for predicting mortality. However, neither the Rockall nor the Blatchford score could accurately predict recurrence of bleeding. When the results in Group B and Group A subgroups were compared, the average Rockall score for Group A was lower than that for Group B (5.6 vs. 6.3, p <0.001). Conclusions: In high-risk patients with peptic ulcer bleeding, the Rockall score can better predict 30-day mortality than can the Blatchford score; this was particularly true for Group B patients.",
keywords = "Endoscopy, Hematemesis, Hemorrhage, Mortality, Peptic ulcer",
author = "Lee, {Mu Shien} and Cheng, {Chi Liang} and Liu, {Nai Jen} and Tsou, {Yung Kuan} and Jui-Hsiang Tang and Lin, {Cheng Hui} and Sung, {Kai Feng} and Lee, {Ching Song}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5754/hge12416",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "1990--1997",
journal = "Acta hepato-splenologica",
issn = "0172-6390",
publisher = "H.G.E. Update Medical Publishing Ltd.",
number = "128",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of rockall and blatchford scores to assess outcome of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers after endoscopic therapy

AU - Lee, Mu Shien

AU - Cheng, Chi Liang

AU - Liu, Nai Jen

AU - Tsou, Yung Kuan

AU - Tang, Jui-Hsiang

AU - Lin, Cheng Hui

AU - Sung, Kai Feng

AU - Lee, Ching Song

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - Background/Aims: To determine the accuracy of Rockall and Blatchford scores for predicting outcome after endoscopic treatment in two groups of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers: those who initially presented with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding (Group A) and those who developed UGI bleeding during hospital treatment for another condition (Group B). Methodology: A total of 593 patients who had had endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcers from January 2009 to July 2010 were divided into Groups A and B. Endoscopic therapy including monotherapy (thermal therapy or hemoclipping) and combination therapy was applied. The Blatchford and complete Rockall scores for the two subgroups were calculated. Predictive statistics for the use of the two scoring systems were then compared for Groups A and B. Results: Thirty-day re-bleeding and mortality rates increased with increased Rockall and Blatchford scores. Rockall scores were more accurate than the Blatchford scores for predicting mortality. However, neither the Rockall nor the Blatchford score could accurately predict recurrence of bleeding. When the results in Group B and Group A subgroups were compared, the average Rockall score for Group A was lower than that for Group B (5.6 vs. 6.3, p <0.001). Conclusions: In high-risk patients with peptic ulcer bleeding, the Rockall score can better predict 30-day mortality than can the Blatchford score; this was particularly true for Group B patients.

AB - Background/Aims: To determine the accuracy of Rockall and Blatchford scores for predicting outcome after endoscopic treatment in two groups of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers: those who initially presented with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding (Group A) and those who developed UGI bleeding during hospital treatment for another condition (Group B). Methodology: A total of 593 patients who had had endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcers from January 2009 to July 2010 were divided into Groups A and B. Endoscopic therapy including monotherapy (thermal therapy or hemoclipping) and combination therapy was applied. The Blatchford and complete Rockall scores for the two subgroups were calculated. Predictive statistics for the use of the two scoring systems were then compared for Groups A and B. Results: Thirty-day re-bleeding and mortality rates increased with increased Rockall and Blatchford scores. Rockall scores were more accurate than the Blatchford scores for predicting mortality. However, neither the Rockall nor the Blatchford score could accurately predict recurrence of bleeding. When the results in Group B and Group A subgroups were compared, the average Rockall score for Group A was lower than that for Group B (5.6 vs. 6.3, p <0.001). Conclusions: In high-risk patients with peptic ulcer bleeding, the Rockall score can better predict 30-day mortality than can the Blatchford score; this was particularly true for Group B patients.

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Hematemesis

KW - Hemorrhage

KW - Mortality

KW - Peptic ulcer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893671199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893671199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5754/hge12416

DO - 10.5754/hge12416

M3 - Article

C2 - 24719939

AN - SCOPUS:84893671199

VL - 60

SP - 1990

EP - 1997

JO - Acta hepato-splenologica

JF - Acta hepato-splenologica

SN - 0172-6390

IS - 128

ER -