Comparison of measurements of refractive errors between the hand-held Retinomax and on-table autorefractors in cyclopleged and noncyclopleged children

Chung Ling Liang, Kuo Sheng Hung, Naeun Park, Patrick Chan, Suh Hang Hank Juo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the measurement of refractive errors (sphere, cylinder, and axis) between the hand-held Retinomax and on-table Topcon autorefractors in cyclopleged and noncyclopleged young children. The average bias and measurement agreement were assessed. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study included 114 cyclopleged and 156 noncyclopleged young children. The mean difference between the two methods and the 95% limits of agreement were calculated to evaluate the average bias. Two types of analyses were conducted to assess the degree of agreement. First, the proportion of the absolute mean differences was presented in different ranges (≤0.25, 0.25-0.5, 0.5-0.75, 0.75-1.0, and >1.0 diopters for sphere and cylinder; 0-10, 11-20 and >20 degrees for axis). Second, the paired t test was conducted to evaluate the consistency of two types of measurements. RESULTS: The data by the Retinomax had mild bias (0.59 diopters) toward a lower sphere data under noncycloplegia but no bias under cycloplegia. For cylinder and axis, there was either no bias or clinically acceptable bias (0.02-0.13 diopters for cylinder and 2-7 degrees for axis) regardless of cycloplegia. Besides the sphere data under noncycloplegia, in general 90% of the mean differences of sphere and cylinder were within 0.5 diopters. More than 97% of the difference in axis under cycloplegia and 68% under noncycloplegia were within 20 degrees. After adjusting for mild bias, the paired t test showed very consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: The data by the Retinomax were consistent with those by the Topcon. The Retinomax is a useful instrument to screen refractive errors in young children.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1120-1128
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume136
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Refractive Errors
Hand
Cross-Sectional Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Comparison of measurements of refractive errors between the hand-held Retinomax and on-table autorefractors in cyclopleged and noncyclopleged children. / Liang, Chung Ling; Hung, Kuo Sheng; Park, Naeun; Chan, Patrick; Hank Juo, Suh Hang.

In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 136, No. 6, 12.2003, p. 1120-1128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c69a161fe1354badbe9028648871a716,
title = "Comparison of measurements of refractive errors between the hand-held Retinomax and on-table autorefractors in cyclopleged and noncyclopleged children",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare the measurement of refractive errors (sphere, cylinder, and axis) between the hand-held Retinomax and on-table Topcon autorefractors in cyclopleged and noncyclopleged young children. The average bias and measurement agreement were assessed. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study included 114 cyclopleged and 156 noncyclopleged young children. The mean difference between the two methods and the 95{\%} limits of agreement were calculated to evaluate the average bias. Two types of analyses were conducted to assess the degree of agreement. First, the proportion of the absolute mean differences was presented in different ranges (≤0.25, 0.25-0.5, 0.5-0.75, 0.75-1.0, and >1.0 diopters for sphere and cylinder; 0-10, 11-20 and >20 degrees for axis). Second, the paired t test was conducted to evaluate the consistency of two types of measurements. RESULTS: The data by the Retinomax had mild bias (0.59 diopters) toward a lower sphere data under noncycloplegia but no bias under cycloplegia. For cylinder and axis, there was either no bias or clinically acceptable bias (0.02-0.13 diopters for cylinder and 2-7 degrees for axis) regardless of cycloplegia. Besides the sphere data under noncycloplegia, in general 90{\%} of the mean differences of sphere and cylinder were within 0.5 diopters. More than 97{\%} of the difference in axis under cycloplegia and 68{\%} under noncycloplegia were within 20 degrees. After adjusting for mild bias, the paired t test showed very consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: The data by the Retinomax were consistent with those by the Topcon. The Retinomax is a useful instrument to screen refractive errors in young children.",
author = "Liang, {Chung Ling} and Hung, {Kuo Sheng} and Naeun Park and Patrick Chan and {Hank Juo}, {Suh Hang}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00789-X",
language = "English",
volume = "136",
pages = "1120--1128",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of measurements of refractive errors between the hand-held Retinomax and on-table autorefractors in cyclopleged and noncyclopleged children

AU - Liang, Chung Ling

AU - Hung, Kuo Sheng

AU - Park, Naeun

AU - Chan, Patrick

AU - Hank Juo, Suh Hang

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare the measurement of refractive errors (sphere, cylinder, and axis) between the hand-held Retinomax and on-table Topcon autorefractors in cyclopleged and noncyclopleged young children. The average bias and measurement agreement were assessed. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study included 114 cyclopleged and 156 noncyclopleged young children. The mean difference between the two methods and the 95% limits of agreement were calculated to evaluate the average bias. Two types of analyses were conducted to assess the degree of agreement. First, the proportion of the absolute mean differences was presented in different ranges (≤0.25, 0.25-0.5, 0.5-0.75, 0.75-1.0, and >1.0 diopters for sphere and cylinder; 0-10, 11-20 and >20 degrees for axis). Second, the paired t test was conducted to evaluate the consistency of two types of measurements. RESULTS: The data by the Retinomax had mild bias (0.59 diopters) toward a lower sphere data under noncycloplegia but no bias under cycloplegia. For cylinder and axis, there was either no bias or clinically acceptable bias (0.02-0.13 diopters for cylinder and 2-7 degrees for axis) regardless of cycloplegia. Besides the sphere data under noncycloplegia, in general 90% of the mean differences of sphere and cylinder were within 0.5 diopters. More than 97% of the difference in axis under cycloplegia and 68% under noncycloplegia were within 20 degrees. After adjusting for mild bias, the paired t test showed very consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: The data by the Retinomax were consistent with those by the Topcon. The Retinomax is a useful instrument to screen refractive errors in young children.

AB - PURPOSE: To compare the measurement of refractive errors (sphere, cylinder, and axis) between the hand-held Retinomax and on-table Topcon autorefractors in cyclopleged and noncyclopleged young children. The average bias and measurement agreement were assessed. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study included 114 cyclopleged and 156 noncyclopleged young children. The mean difference between the two methods and the 95% limits of agreement were calculated to evaluate the average bias. Two types of analyses were conducted to assess the degree of agreement. First, the proportion of the absolute mean differences was presented in different ranges (≤0.25, 0.25-0.5, 0.5-0.75, 0.75-1.0, and >1.0 diopters for sphere and cylinder; 0-10, 11-20 and >20 degrees for axis). Second, the paired t test was conducted to evaluate the consistency of two types of measurements. RESULTS: The data by the Retinomax had mild bias (0.59 diopters) toward a lower sphere data under noncycloplegia but no bias under cycloplegia. For cylinder and axis, there was either no bias or clinically acceptable bias (0.02-0.13 diopters for cylinder and 2-7 degrees for axis) regardless of cycloplegia. Besides the sphere data under noncycloplegia, in general 90% of the mean differences of sphere and cylinder were within 0.5 diopters. More than 97% of the difference in axis under cycloplegia and 68% under noncycloplegia were within 20 degrees. After adjusting for mild bias, the paired t test showed very consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: The data by the Retinomax were consistent with those by the Topcon. The Retinomax is a useful instrument to screen refractive errors in young children.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344441349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344441349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00789-X

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00789-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 14644224

AN - SCOPUS:0344441349

VL - 136

SP - 1120

EP - 1128

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 6

ER -