Comparison of Different Sizes of Bioabsorbable Interference Screws for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bioabsorbable Bead Augmentation in a Porcine Model

Pei Hung Shen, Shiu Bii Lien, Hsain Chung Shen, Chih Chien Wang, Guo Shu Huang, Kuo Hua Chao, Chian Her Lee, Leou Chyr Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the initial fixation strength of tendon grafts between different sizes of bioabsorbable interference screws (BioScrew; Linvatec, Largo, FL) with bioabsorbable bead (EndoPearl; Linvatec) augmentation through biomechanical analysis of a porcine femoral bone model. Methods: Forty pairs of porcine femurs and porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were divided into control and study groups. In the control group 8 × 30-mm BioScrews alone (n = 10) were inserted, whereas different sizes of BioScrews, measuring 7 × 30 mm (n = 10), 8 × 30 mm (n = 10), and 9 × 30 mm (n = 10), with 8-mm EndoPearl augmentation were inserted individually for fixation of tendon grafts in the study groups. All specimens were cyclically loaded with axial forces between 50 and 250 N at 1 Hz for 3,000 cycles and then incrementally loaded to failure at a rate of 150 mm/min. Results: BioScrews with EndoPearl augmentation had a significantly higher failure load than BioScrews alone (8-mm BioScrew alone v 8-mm BioScrew and EndoPearl, P <.05). There were no significant differences in the ultimate failure load (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .201 and P = .871, respectively), stiffness (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .789 and P = .823, respectively), displacement (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .695 and P = .781, respectively), and bone mineral density (P = .728 for all comparisons) except insertion torque (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .045 and P = .518, respectively) between study groups. Less tendon laceration by the screw thread was noted in the group in which smaller-sized BioScrews were used. Conclusions: When EndoPearl augmentation was used, smaller-sized BioScrews (BioScrew size 1 mm smaller than bone tunnel) offered equivalent graft fixation strength to BioScrews of similar or larger sizes. Clinical Relevance: Smaller-sized BioScrews can be chosen if EndoPearl augmentation has been used, and EndoPearl augmentation may reduce the risk of tendon rupture while BioScrews are inserted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1101-1107
Number of pages7
JournalArthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume25
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Tendons
Swine
caroverine
Transplants
Bone and Bones
Control Groups
Lacerations
Torque
Thigh
Bone Density
Femur
Rupture

Keywords

  • Anterior cruciate ligament
  • Bioabsorbable bead
  • Graft fixation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of Different Sizes of Bioabsorbable Interference Screws for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bioabsorbable Bead Augmentation in a Porcine Model. / Shen, Pei Hung; Lien, Shiu Bii; Shen, Hsain Chung; Wang, Chih Chien; Huang, Guo Shu; Chao, Kuo Hua; Lee, Chian Her; Lin, Leou Chyr.

In: Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol. 25, No. 10, 10.2009, p. 1101-1107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shen, Pei Hung ; Lien, Shiu Bii ; Shen, Hsain Chung ; Wang, Chih Chien ; Huang, Guo Shu ; Chao, Kuo Hua ; Lee, Chian Her ; Lin, Leou Chyr. / Comparison of Different Sizes of Bioabsorbable Interference Screws for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bioabsorbable Bead Augmentation in a Porcine Model. In: Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 25, No. 10. pp. 1101-1107.
@article{630ce21e98a0439cac193ca83205aeac,
title = "Comparison of Different Sizes of Bioabsorbable Interference Screws for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bioabsorbable Bead Augmentation in a Porcine Model",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the initial fixation strength of tendon grafts between different sizes of bioabsorbable interference screws (BioScrew; Linvatec, Largo, FL) with bioabsorbable bead (EndoPearl; Linvatec) augmentation through biomechanical analysis of a porcine femoral bone model. Methods: Forty pairs of porcine femurs and porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were divided into control and study groups. In the control group 8 × 30-mm BioScrews alone (n = 10) were inserted, whereas different sizes of BioScrews, measuring 7 × 30 mm (n = 10), 8 × 30 mm (n = 10), and 9 × 30 mm (n = 10), with 8-mm EndoPearl augmentation were inserted individually for fixation of tendon grafts in the study groups. All specimens were cyclically loaded with axial forces between 50 and 250 N at 1 Hz for 3,000 cycles and then incrementally loaded to failure at a rate of 150 mm/min. Results: BioScrews with EndoPearl augmentation had a significantly higher failure load than BioScrews alone (8-mm BioScrew alone v 8-mm BioScrew and EndoPearl, P <.05). There were no significant differences in the ultimate failure load (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .201 and P = .871, respectively), stiffness (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .789 and P = .823, respectively), displacement (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .695 and P = .781, respectively), and bone mineral density (P = .728 for all comparisons) except insertion torque (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .045 and P = .518, respectively) between study groups. Less tendon laceration by the screw thread was noted in the group in which smaller-sized BioScrews were used. Conclusions: When EndoPearl augmentation was used, smaller-sized BioScrews (BioScrew size 1 mm smaller than bone tunnel) offered equivalent graft fixation strength to BioScrews of similar or larger sizes. Clinical Relevance: Smaller-sized BioScrews can be chosen if EndoPearl augmentation has been used, and EndoPearl augmentation may reduce the risk of tendon rupture while BioScrews are inserted.",
keywords = "Anterior cruciate ligament, Bioabsorbable bead, Graft fixation",
author = "Shen, {Pei Hung} and Lien, {Shiu Bii} and Shen, {Hsain Chung} and Wang, {Chih Chien} and Huang, {Guo Shu} and Chao, {Kuo Hua} and Lee, {Chian Her} and Lin, {Leou Chyr}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.arthro.2009.05.011",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1101--1107",
journal = "Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery",
issn = "0749-8063",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Different Sizes of Bioabsorbable Interference Screws for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bioabsorbable Bead Augmentation in a Porcine Model

AU - Shen, Pei Hung

AU - Lien, Shiu Bii

AU - Shen, Hsain Chung

AU - Wang, Chih Chien

AU - Huang, Guo Shu

AU - Chao, Kuo Hua

AU - Lee, Chian Her

AU - Lin, Leou Chyr

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the initial fixation strength of tendon grafts between different sizes of bioabsorbable interference screws (BioScrew; Linvatec, Largo, FL) with bioabsorbable bead (EndoPearl; Linvatec) augmentation through biomechanical analysis of a porcine femoral bone model. Methods: Forty pairs of porcine femurs and porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were divided into control and study groups. In the control group 8 × 30-mm BioScrews alone (n = 10) were inserted, whereas different sizes of BioScrews, measuring 7 × 30 mm (n = 10), 8 × 30 mm (n = 10), and 9 × 30 mm (n = 10), with 8-mm EndoPearl augmentation were inserted individually for fixation of tendon grafts in the study groups. All specimens were cyclically loaded with axial forces between 50 and 250 N at 1 Hz for 3,000 cycles and then incrementally loaded to failure at a rate of 150 mm/min. Results: BioScrews with EndoPearl augmentation had a significantly higher failure load than BioScrews alone (8-mm BioScrew alone v 8-mm BioScrew and EndoPearl, P <.05). There were no significant differences in the ultimate failure load (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .201 and P = .871, respectively), stiffness (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .789 and P = .823, respectively), displacement (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .695 and P = .781, respectively), and bone mineral density (P = .728 for all comparisons) except insertion torque (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .045 and P = .518, respectively) between study groups. Less tendon laceration by the screw thread was noted in the group in which smaller-sized BioScrews were used. Conclusions: When EndoPearl augmentation was used, smaller-sized BioScrews (BioScrew size 1 mm smaller than bone tunnel) offered equivalent graft fixation strength to BioScrews of similar or larger sizes. Clinical Relevance: Smaller-sized BioScrews can be chosen if EndoPearl augmentation has been used, and EndoPearl augmentation may reduce the risk of tendon rupture while BioScrews are inserted.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the initial fixation strength of tendon grafts between different sizes of bioabsorbable interference screws (BioScrew; Linvatec, Largo, FL) with bioabsorbable bead (EndoPearl; Linvatec) augmentation through biomechanical analysis of a porcine femoral bone model. Methods: Forty pairs of porcine femurs and porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were divided into control and study groups. In the control group 8 × 30-mm BioScrews alone (n = 10) were inserted, whereas different sizes of BioScrews, measuring 7 × 30 mm (n = 10), 8 × 30 mm (n = 10), and 9 × 30 mm (n = 10), with 8-mm EndoPearl augmentation were inserted individually for fixation of tendon grafts in the study groups. All specimens were cyclically loaded with axial forces between 50 and 250 N at 1 Hz for 3,000 cycles and then incrementally loaded to failure at a rate of 150 mm/min. Results: BioScrews with EndoPearl augmentation had a significantly higher failure load than BioScrews alone (8-mm BioScrew alone v 8-mm BioScrew and EndoPearl, P <.05). There were no significant differences in the ultimate failure load (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .201 and P = .871, respectively), stiffness (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .789 and P = .823, respectively), displacement (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .695 and P = .781, respectively), and bone mineral density (P = .728 for all comparisons) except insertion torque (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .045 and P = .518, respectively) between study groups. Less tendon laceration by the screw thread was noted in the group in which smaller-sized BioScrews were used. Conclusions: When EndoPearl augmentation was used, smaller-sized BioScrews (BioScrew size 1 mm smaller than bone tunnel) offered equivalent graft fixation strength to BioScrews of similar or larger sizes. Clinical Relevance: Smaller-sized BioScrews can be chosen if EndoPearl augmentation has been used, and EndoPearl augmentation may reduce the risk of tendon rupture while BioScrews are inserted.

KW - Anterior cruciate ligament

KW - Bioabsorbable bead

KW - Graft fixation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349435993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349435993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.05.011

DO - 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.05.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 19801288

AN - SCOPUS:70349435993

VL - 25

SP - 1101

EP - 1107

JO - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery

JF - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery

SN - 0749-8063

IS - 10

ER -