Comparison of cage application modality in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation-A finite element study

Yang Hwei Tsuang, Yueh Feng Chiang, Chih Y. Hung, Hung W. Wei, Chang Hung Huang, Cheng Kung Cheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) cages have achieved satisfactory fusion results, but cases of cage migration or mechanical failure were repeatedly reported. Therefore, we conducted a finite element study to determine the impact of cage applications including number, positioning, and adding posterior instrumentation (PI). Methods: A finite element model of the lumbar spine was generated from Computer Tomography scans and was validated. Partial laminectomy, diskectomy with partial facetectomy, and single or double-cage insertion were simulated onto the model, with or without posterior pedicle screws instrumentation. The maximal von Mises stresses between different loading conditions were compared between modalities to evaluate the risks of migration or mechanical failure. Results: Posterior instrumentation decreases at least half the distortion stress of cage-endplate interface and facet joints, and diminishes the differences between the stresses of inserting one or two cages. Based on one cage insertion, adding posterior instrumentation provides more efficient stability than an additional cage. Furthermore, an obliquely inserted cage with posterior instrumentation produced lower stress than a cage inserted on one side due to better structural symmetry. Conclusively, one oblique anterior cage and bilateral posterior pedicle screws reconstructed the tripod system as the intact disc and facet joints, and provided similar stability as two cages did.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)565-570
Number of pages6
JournalMedical Engineering and Physics
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Zygapophyseal Joint
Fusion reactions
Diskectomy
Laminectomy
Spine
Tomography
Pedicle Screws

Keywords

  • Cage position
  • Finite element analysis (FEA)
  • Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Comparison of cage application modality in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation-A finite element study. / Tsuang, Yang Hwei; Chiang, Yueh Feng; Hung, Chih Y.; Wei, Hung W.; Huang, Chang Hung; Cheng, Cheng Kung.

In: Medical Engineering and Physics, Vol. 31, No. 5, 06.2009, p. 565-570.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsuang, Yang Hwei ; Chiang, Yueh Feng ; Hung, Chih Y. ; Wei, Hung W. ; Huang, Chang Hung ; Cheng, Cheng Kung. / Comparison of cage application modality in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation-A finite element study. In: Medical Engineering and Physics. 2009 ; Vol. 31, No. 5. pp. 565-570.
@article{b79af1bb8c3e4c2a80275655b8eede03,
title = "Comparison of cage application modality in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation-A finite element study",
abstract = "Background: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) cages have achieved satisfactory fusion results, but cases of cage migration or mechanical failure were repeatedly reported. Therefore, we conducted a finite element study to determine the impact of cage applications including number, positioning, and adding posterior instrumentation (PI). Methods: A finite element model of the lumbar spine was generated from Computer Tomography scans and was validated. Partial laminectomy, diskectomy with partial facetectomy, and single or double-cage insertion were simulated onto the model, with or without posterior pedicle screws instrumentation. The maximal von Mises stresses between different loading conditions were compared between modalities to evaluate the risks of migration or mechanical failure. Results: Posterior instrumentation decreases at least half the distortion stress of cage-endplate interface and facet joints, and diminishes the differences between the stresses of inserting one or two cages. Based on one cage insertion, adding posterior instrumentation provides more efficient stability than an additional cage. Furthermore, an obliquely inserted cage with posterior instrumentation produced lower stress than a cage inserted on one side due to better structural symmetry. Conclusively, one oblique anterior cage and bilateral posterior pedicle screws reconstructed the tripod system as the intact disc and facet joints, and provided similar stability as two cages did.",
keywords = "Cage position, Finite element analysis (FEA), Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)",
author = "Tsuang, {Yang Hwei} and Chiang, {Yueh Feng} and Hung, {Chih Y.} and Wei, {Hung W.} and Huang, {Chang Hung} and Cheng, {Cheng Kung}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.012",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "565--570",
journal = "Medical Engineering and Physics",
issn = "1350-4533",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of cage application modality in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation-A finite element study

AU - Tsuang, Yang Hwei

AU - Chiang, Yueh Feng

AU - Hung, Chih Y.

AU - Wei, Hung W.

AU - Huang, Chang Hung

AU - Cheng, Cheng Kung

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Background: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) cages have achieved satisfactory fusion results, but cases of cage migration or mechanical failure were repeatedly reported. Therefore, we conducted a finite element study to determine the impact of cage applications including number, positioning, and adding posterior instrumentation (PI). Methods: A finite element model of the lumbar spine was generated from Computer Tomography scans and was validated. Partial laminectomy, diskectomy with partial facetectomy, and single or double-cage insertion were simulated onto the model, with or without posterior pedicle screws instrumentation. The maximal von Mises stresses between different loading conditions were compared between modalities to evaluate the risks of migration or mechanical failure. Results: Posterior instrumentation decreases at least half the distortion stress of cage-endplate interface and facet joints, and diminishes the differences between the stresses of inserting one or two cages. Based on one cage insertion, adding posterior instrumentation provides more efficient stability than an additional cage. Furthermore, an obliquely inserted cage with posterior instrumentation produced lower stress than a cage inserted on one side due to better structural symmetry. Conclusively, one oblique anterior cage and bilateral posterior pedicle screws reconstructed the tripod system as the intact disc and facet joints, and provided similar stability as two cages did.

AB - Background: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) cages have achieved satisfactory fusion results, but cases of cage migration or mechanical failure were repeatedly reported. Therefore, we conducted a finite element study to determine the impact of cage applications including number, positioning, and adding posterior instrumentation (PI). Methods: A finite element model of the lumbar spine was generated from Computer Tomography scans and was validated. Partial laminectomy, diskectomy with partial facetectomy, and single or double-cage insertion were simulated onto the model, with or without posterior pedicle screws instrumentation. The maximal von Mises stresses between different loading conditions were compared between modalities to evaluate the risks of migration or mechanical failure. Results: Posterior instrumentation decreases at least half the distortion stress of cage-endplate interface and facet joints, and diminishes the differences between the stresses of inserting one or two cages. Based on one cage insertion, adding posterior instrumentation provides more efficient stability than an additional cage. Furthermore, an obliquely inserted cage with posterior instrumentation produced lower stress than a cage inserted on one side due to better structural symmetry. Conclusively, one oblique anterior cage and bilateral posterior pedicle screws reconstructed the tripod system as the intact disc and facet joints, and provided similar stability as two cages did.

KW - Cage position

KW - Finite element analysis (FEA)

KW - Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349134674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349134674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.012

DO - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 19117789

AN - SCOPUS:67349134674

VL - 31

SP - 565

EP - 570

JO - Medical Engineering and Physics

JF - Medical Engineering and Physics

SN - 1350-4533

IS - 5

ER -