Comparison of body's center of mass motion relative to center of pressure between treadmill and over-ground walking

Hsuan Lun Lu, Tung Wu Lu, Hsiu Chen Lin, Wing P. Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Treadmills have been used in rehabilitation settings to provide convenient protocols and continuous monitoring of movement over multiple cycles at well-controlled speeds for gait and balance training. However, the potential differences in the movement control may affect the translation of the training outcomes to real life over-ground walking (OW). The similarities and differences in the balance control between treadmill walking (TW) and OW have largely been unexplored. The current study bridged the gap by comparing the motions of the body's center of mass (COM) relative to the center of pressure (COP) between TW and OW, in terms of the COM-COP inclination angle (IA) and its rate of change (RCIA). The movement of the COM and COP separately were quite different between OW and TW, but when describing the COM motion relative to the COP, the COM motions became similar qualitatively with similar butterfly patterns. However, significantly increased peak values in themediolateral RCIA and greater ranges of mediolateral IA were found during TW (p < 0.004). In the sagittal plane, the posterior velocity of the belt led to an anterior RCIA (posterior RCIA in OW) with increasing anterior IA during early double-limb support phase, and reduced posterior RCIA (p < 0.009) with an increased anterior IA (p < 0.001) during the remainder of the phase. These differences between TW and OW may have to be taken into account in future designs of strategies to optimize the translation of treadmill gait training outcomes into real life over-ground walking.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)248-253
Number of pages6
JournalGait and Posture
Volume53
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Walking
Pressure
Butterflies
Gait
Rehabilitation
Extremities

Keywords

  • Balance control
  • COM COP movement
  • Over-ground walking
  • Treadmill walking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Comparison of body's center of mass motion relative to center of pressure between treadmill and over-ground walking. / Lu, Hsuan Lun; Lu, Tung Wu; Lin, Hsiu Chen; Chan, Wing P.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 53, 01.03.2017, p. 248-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{61aa1a63aee1437aa749fb432187263e,
title = "Comparison of body's center of mass motion relative to center of pressure between treadmill and over-ground walking",
abstract = "Treadmills have been used in rehabilitation settings to provide convenient protocols and continuous monitoring of movement over multiple cycles at well-controlled speeds for gait and balance training. However, the potential differences in the movement control may affect the translation of the training outcomes to real life over-ground walking (OW). The similarities and differences in the balance control between treadmill walking (TW) and OW have largely been unexplored. The current study bridged the gap by comparing the motions of the body's center of mass (COM) relative to the center of pressure (COP) between TW and OW, in terms of the COM-COP inclination angle (IA) and its rate of change (RCIA). The movement of the COM and COP separately were quite different between OW and TW, but when describing the COM motion relative to the COP, the COM motions became similar qualitatively with similar butterfly patterns. However, significantly increased peak values in themediolateral RCIA and greater ranges of mediolateral IA were found during TW (p < 0.004). In the sagittal plane, the posterior velocity of the belt led to an anterior RCIA (posterior RCIA in OW) with increasing anterior IA during early double-limb support phase, and reduced posterior RCIA (p < 0.009) with an increased anterior IA (p < 0.001) during the remainder of the phase. These differences between TW and OW may have to be taken into account in future designs of strategies to optimize the translation of treadmill gait training outcomes into real life over-ground walking.",
keywords = "Balance control, COM COP movement, Over-ground walking, Treadmill walking",
author = "Lu, {Hsuan Lun} and Lu, {Tung Wu} and Lin, {Hsiu Chen} and Chan, {Wing P.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.02.003",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "248--253",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of body's center of mass motion relative to center of pressure between treadmill and over-ground walking

AU - Lu, Hsuan Lun

AU - Lu, Tung Wu

AU - Lin, Hsiu Chen

AU - Chan, Wing P.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Treadmills have been used in rehabilitation settings to provide convenient protocols and continuous monitoring of movement over multiple cycles at well-controlled speeds for gait and balance training. However, the potential differences in the movement control may affect the translation of the training outcomes to real life over-ground walking (OW). The similarities and differences in the balance control between treadmill walking (TW) and OW have largely been unexplored. The current study bridged the gap by comparing the motions of the body's center of mass (COM) relative to the center of pressure (COP) between TW and OW, in terms of the COM-COP inclination angle (IA) and its rate of change (RCIA). The movement of the COM and COP separately were quite different between OW and TW, but when describing the COM motion relative to the COP, the COM motions became similar qualitatively with similar butterfly patterns. However, significantly increased peak values in themediolateral RCIA and greater ranges of mediolateral IA were found during TW (p < 0.004). In the sagittal plane, the posterior velocity of the belt led to an anterior RCIA (posterior RCIA in OW) with increasing anterior IA during early double-limb support phase, and reduced posterior RCIA (p < 0.009) with an increased anterior IA (p < 0.001) during the remainder of the phase. These differences between TW and OW may have to be taken into account in future designs of strategies to optimize the translation of treadmill gait training outcomes into real life over-ground walking.

AB - Treadmills have been used in rehabilitation settings to provide convenient protocols and continuous monitoring of movement over multiple cycles at well-controlled speeds for gait and balance training. However, the potential differences in the movement control may affect the translation of the training outcomes to real life over-ground walking (OW). The similarities and differences in the balance control between treadmill walking (TW) and OW have largely been unexplored. The current study bridged the gap by comparing the motions of the body's center of mass (COM) relative to the center of pressure (COP) between TW and OW, in terms of the COM-COP inclination angle (IA) and its rate of change (RCIA). The movement of the COM and COP separately were quite different between OW and TW, but when describing the COM motion relative to the COP, the COM motions became similar qualitatively with similar butterfly patterns. However, significantly increased peak values in themediolateral RCIA and greater ranges of mediolateral IA were found during TW (p < 0.004). In the sagittal plane, the posterior velocity of the belt led to an anterior RCIA (posterior RCIA in OW) with increasing anterior IA during early double-limb support phase, and reduced posterior RCIA (p < 0.009) with an increased anterior IA (p < 0.001) during the remainder of the phase. These differences between TW and OW may have to be taken into account in future designs of strategies to optimize the translation of treadmill gait training outcomes into real life over-ground walking.

KW - Balance control

KW - COM COP movement

KW - Over-ground walking

KW - Treadmill walking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013287745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013287745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.02.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 28231557

AN - SCOPUS:85013287745

VL - 53

SP - 248

EP - 253

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

ER -