Comparison of accessing online databases between physicians and nurses in Taiwan

Ya Wen Chiu, Yi Hao Weng, Heng Lien Lo, Ya Hui Shih, Chih Cheng Hsu, Ken N. Kuo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Online databases have been increasingly used as a key resource in the search for health information. The current study aims to compare the use patterns of online databases between physicians and nurses. A structured questionnaire was mailed to physicians and nurses of randomly selected regional hospitals in Taiwan. Valid questionnaires with complete answers were collected from 544 physicians and 1,573 nurses from November 2008 to February 2009. In general, physicians made more use of online databases than nurses (p <0.001). They more often accessed English-language online databases (p <0.001), including MEDLINE, MD Consult, UpToDate, Cochrane Library and ProQuest. On the other hand, nurses accessed Chinese-language online databases more frequently than physicians (p <0.001). Using a multivariate logistic regression model to adjust the personal characteristics, we found that nurses more often accessed Chinese-language online databases than physicians. Physicians used online databases to locate health information the most for clinical practice (76.6%), followed by instruction preparation (63.3%), and research (57.0%). Nevertheless, nurses used such databases more often for class assignments (66.4%) and clinical practice (55.8%). In conclusion, the behavior and motivation of access to online databases varied between physicians and nurses. Our findings provide evidence in the strategies to enhance the accessing of online databases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)230-241
Number of pages12
JournalInformatics for Health and Social Care
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Taiwan
Nurses
Databases
Physicians
Language
Logistic Models
Health
MEDLINE
Libraries
Motivation

Keywords

  • Databases
  • Evidence-based
  • Nurses
  • Online
  • Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management
  • Nursing (miscellaneous)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparison of accessing online databases between physicians and nurses in Taiwan. / Chiu, Ya Wen; Weng, Yi Hao; Lo, Heng Lien; Shih, Ya Hui; Hsu, Chih Cheng; Kuo, Ken N.

In: Informatics for Health and Social Care, Vol. 37, No. 4, 12.2012, p. 230-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chiu, Ya Wen ; Weng, Yi Hao ; Lo, Heng Lien ; Shih, Ya Hui ; Hsu, Chih Cheng ; Kuo, Ken N. / Comparison of accessing online databases between physicians and nurses in Taiwan. In: Informatics for Health and Social Care. 2012 ; Vol. 37, No. 4. pp. 230-241.
@article{97b9dd51c2f04be4bb4ea0581a7738ca,
title = "Comparison of accessing online databases between physicians and nurses in Taiwan",
abstract = "Online databases have been increasingly used as a key resource in the search for health information. The current study aims to compare the use patterns of online databases between physicians and nurses. A structured questionnaire was mailed to physicians and nurses of randomly selected regional hospitals in Taiwan. Valid questionnaires with complete answers were collected from 544 physicians and 1,573 nurses from November 2008 to February 2009. In general, physicians made more use of online databases than nurses (p <0.001). They more often accessed English-language online databases (p <0.001), including MEDLINE, MD Consult, UpToDate, Cochrane Library and ProQuest. On the other hand, nurses accessed Chinese-language online databases more frequently than physicians (p <0.001). Using a multivariate logistic regression model to adjust the personal characteristics, we found that nurses more often accessed Chinese-language online databases than physicians. Physicians used online databases to locate health information the most for clinical practice (76.6{\%}), followed by instruction preparation (63.3{\%}), and research (57.0{\%}). Nevertheless, nurses used such databases more often for class assignments (66.4{\%}) and clinical practice (55.8{\%}). In conclusion, the behavior and motivation of access to online databases varied between physicians and nurses. Our findings provide evidence in the strategies to enhance the accessing of online databases.",
keywords = "Databases, Evidence-based, Nurses, Online, Physicians",
author = "Chiu, {Ya Wen} and Weng, {Yi Hao} and Lo, {Heng Lien} and Shih, {Ya Hui} and Hsu, {Chih Cheng} and Kuo, {Ken N.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.3109/17538157.2012.654842",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "230--241",
journal = "Informatics for Health and Social Care",
issn = "1753-8157",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of accessing online databases between physicians and nurses in Taiwan

AU - Chiu, Ya Wen

AU - Weng, Yi Hao

AU - Lo, Heng Lien

AU - Shih, Ya Hui

AU - Hsu, Chih Cheng

AU - Kuo, Ken N.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Online databases have been increasingly used as a key resource in the search for health information. The current study aims to compare the use patterns of online databases between physicians and nurses. A structured questionnaire was mailed to physicians and nurses of randomly selected regional hospitals in Taiwan. Valid questionnaires with complete answers were collected from 544 physicians and 1,573 nurses from November 2008 to February 2009. In general, physicians made more use of online databases than nurses (p <0.001). They more often accessed English-language online databases (p <0.001), including MEDLINE, MD Consult, UpToDate, Cochrane Library and ProQuest. On the other hand, nurses accessed Chinese-language online databases more frequently than physicians (p <0.001). Using a multivariate logistic regression model to adjust the personal characteristics, we found that nurses more often accessed Chinese-language online databases than physicians. Physicians used online databases to locate health information the most for clinical practice (76.6%), followed by instruction preparation (63.3%), and research (57.0%). Nevertheless, nurses used such databases more often for class assignments (66.4%) and clinical practice (55.8%). In conclusion, the behavior and motivation of access to online databases varied between physicians and nurses. Our findings provide evidence in the strategies to enhance the accessing of online databases.

AB - Online databases have been increasingly used as a key resource in the search for health information. The current study aims to compare the use patterns of online databases between physicians and nurses. A structured questionnaire was mailed to physicians and nurses of randomly selected regional hospitals in Taiwan. Valid questionnaires with complete answers were collected from 544 physicians and 1,573 nurses from November 2008 to February 2009. In general, physicians made more use of online databases than nurses (p <0.001). They more often accessed English-language online databases (p <0.001), including MEDLINE, MD Consult, UpToDate, Cochrane Library and ProQuest. On the other hand, nurses accessed Chinese-language online databases more frequently than physicians (p <0.001). Using a multivariate logistic regression model to adjust the personal characteristics, we found that nurses more often accessed Chinese-language online databases than physicians. Physicians used online databases to locate health information the most for clinical practice (76.6%), followed by instruction preparation (63.3%), and research (57.0%). Nevertheless, nurses used such databases more often for class assignments (66.4%) and clinical practice (55.8%). In conclusion, the behavior and motivation of access to online databases varied between physicians and nurses. Our findings provide evidence in the strategies to enhance the accessing of online databases.

KW - Databases

KW - Evidence-based

KW - Nurses

KW - Online

KW - Physicians

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870681434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870681434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/17538157.2012.654842

DO - 10.3109/17538157.2012.654842

M3 - Article

C2 - 22657100

AN - SCOPUS:84870681434

VL - 37

SP - 230

EP - 241

JO - Informatics for Health and Social Care

JF - Informatics for Health and Social Care

SN - 1753-8157

IS - 4

ER -