Comparison and prediction of pullout strength of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws within synthetic bone

Wen Chi Tsai, Po Quang Chen, Tung Wu Lu, Shing Sheng Wu, Kao Shang Shih, Shang Chih Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. This study was designed to derive the theoretical formulae to predict the pullout strength of pedicle screws with an inconstant outer and/or inner diameter distribution (conical screws). For the transpedicular fixation, one of the failure modes is the screw loosening from the vertebral bone. Hence, various kinds of pedicle screws have been evaluated to measure the pullout strength using synthetic and cadaveric bone as specimens. In the literature, the Chapman's formula has been widely proposed to predict the pullout strength of screws with constant outer and inner diameters (cylindrical screws). Methods. This study formulated the pullout strength of the conical and cylindrical screws as the functions of material, screw, and surgery factors. The predicted pullout strength of each screw was compared to the experimentally measured data. Synthetic bones were used to standardize the material properties of the specimen and provide observation of the loosening mechanism of the bone/screw construct. Results. The predicted data from the new formulae were better correlated with the mean pullout strength of both the cylindrical and conical screws within an average error of 5.0% and R2= 0.93. On the other hand, the average error and R2value of the literature formula were as high as -32.3% and -0.26, respectively. Conclusion. The pullout strength of the pedicle screws was the functions of bone strength, screw design, and pilot hole. The close correlation between the measured and predicted pullout strength validated the value of the new formulae, so as avoid repeating experimental tests.

Original languageEnglish
Article number44
JournalBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Bone Screws
Bone and Bones
Observation
Pedicle Screws

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Comparison and prediction of pullout strength of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws within synthetic bone. / Tsai, Wen Chi; Chen, Po Quang; Lu, Tung Wu; Wu, Shing Sheng; Shih, Kao Shang; Lin, Shang Chih.

In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 10, No. 1, 44, 2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsai, Wen Chi ; Chen, Po Quang ; Lu, Tung Wu ; Wu, Shing Sheng ; Shih, Kao Shang ; Lin, Shang Chih. / Comparison and prediction of pullout strength of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws within synthetic bone. In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2009 ; Vol. 10, No. 1.
@article{7ad0e1055d3f4e2583651cc435983934,
title = "Comparison and prediction of pullout strength of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws within synthetic bone",
abstract = "Background. This study was designed to derive the theoretical formulae to predict the pullout strength of pedicle screws with an inconstant outer and/or inner diameter distribution (conical screws). For the transpedicular fixation, one of the failure modes is the screw loosening from the vertebral bone. Hence, various kinds of pedicle screws have been evaluated to measure the pullout strength using synthetic and cadaveric bone as specimens. In the literature, the Chapman's formula has been widely proposed to predict the pullout strength of screws with constant outer and inner diameters (cylindrical screws). Methods. This study formulated the pullout strength of the conical and cylindrical screws as the functions of material, screw, and surgery factors. The predicted pullout strength of each screw was compared to the experimentally measured data. Synthetic bones were used to standardize the material properties of the specimen and provide observation of the loosening mechanism of the bone/screw construct. Results. The predicted data from the new formulae were better correlated with the mean pullout strength of both the cylindrical and conical screws within an average error of 5.0{\%} and R2= 0.93. On the other hand, the average error and R2value of the literature formula were as high as -32.3{\%} and -0.26, respectively. Conclusion. The pullout strength of the pedicle screws was the functions of bone strength, screw design, and pilot hole. The close correlation between the measured and predicted pullout strength validated the value of the new formulae, so as avoid repeating experimental tests.",
author = "Tsai, {Wen Chi} and Chen, {Po Quang} and Lu, {Tung Wu} and Wu, {Shing Sheng} and Shih, {Kao Shang} and Lin, {Shang Chih}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2474-10-44",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders",
issn = "1471-2474",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison and prediction of pullout strength of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws within synthetic bone

AU - Tsai, Wen Chi

AU - Chen, Po Quang

AU - Lu, Tung Wu

AU - Wu, Shing Sheng

AU - Shih, Kao Shang

AU - Lin, Shang Chih

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Background. This study was designed to derive the theoretical formulae to predict the pullout strength of pedicle screws with an inconstant outer and/or inner diameter distribution (conical screws). For the transpedicular fixation, one of the failure modes is the screw loosening from the vertebral bone. Hence, various kinds of pedicle screws have been evaluated to measure the pullout strength using synthetic and cadaveric bone as specimens. In the literature, the Chapman's formula has been widely proposed to predict the pullout strength of screws with constant outer and inner diameters (cylindrical screws). Methods. This study formulated the pullout strength of the conical and cylindrical screws as the functions of material, screw, and surgery factors. The predicted pullout strength of each screw was compared to the experimentally measured data. Synthetic bones were used to standardize the material properties of the specimen and provide observation of the loosening mechanism of the bone/screw construct. Results. The predicted data from the new formulae were better correlated with the mean pullout strength of both the cylindrical and conical screws within an average error of 5.0% and R2= 0.93. On the other hand, the average error and R2value of the literature formula were as high as -32.3% and -0.26, respectively. Conclusion. The pullout strength of the pedicle screws was the functions of bone strength, screw design, and pilot hole. The close correlation between the measured and predicted pullout strength validated the value of the new formulae, so as avoid repeating experimental tests.

AB - Background. This study was designed to derive the theoretical formulae to predict the pullout strength of pedicle screws with an inconstant outer and/or inner diameter distribution (conical screws). For the transpedicular fixation, one of the failure modes is the screw loosening from the vertebral bone. Hence, various kinds of pedicle screws have been evaluated to measure the pullout strength using synthetic and cadaveric bone as specimens. In the literature, the Chapman's formula has been widely proposed to predict the pullout strength of screws with constant outer and inner diameters (cylindrical screws). Methods. This study formulated the pullout strength of the conical and cylindrical screws as the functions of material, screw, and surgery factors. The predicted pullout strength of each screw was compared to the experimentally measured data. Synthetic bones were used to standardize the material properties of the specimen and provide observation of the loosening mechanism of the bone/screw construct. Results. The predicted data from the new formulae were better correlated with the mean pullout strength of both the cylindrical and conical screws within an average error of 5.0% and R2= 0.93. On the other hand, the average error and R2value of the literature formula were as high as -32.3% and -0.26, respectively. Conclusion. The pullout strength of the pedicle screws was the functions of bone strength, screw design, and pilot hole. The close correlation between the measured and predicted pullout strength validated the value of the new formulae, so as avoid repeating experimental tests.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650670718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650670718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2474-10-44

DO - 10.1186/1471-2474-10-44

M3 - Article

C2 - 19402917

AN - SCOPUS:67650670718

VL - 10

JO - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

JF - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

SN - 1471-2474

IS - 1

M1 - 44

ER -