Comparing the effectiveness of laser vs. conventional endoforehead lifting

Cheng Jen Chang, De Yi Yu, Shu Ying Chang, Yen Chang Hsiao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of laser versus conventional endoforehead lifting. Over a period of 12 years (January 2000–January 2012), a total of 110 patients with hyperactive muscles over the frontal region have been collected for a retrospective study. The SurgiLase 150XJ CO2 laser system, in conjunction with the flexible FIBERLASE, was used. The endoscope was 4 mm in diameter with an angle of 30°. The primary efficacy measurement was the assessment of the final outcome for using laser vs. conventional methods. Both groups were observed at three weeks, six weeks and six months after surgery. The most common complication in early convalescence (three weeks) was swelling. This was followed by local paraesthesia, ecchymosis, localized hematomas and scar with alopecia. All these problems disappeared completely after the 6-month study period. Based on a chi-square analysis, there were clinically and statistically significant differences favouring the laser endoforehead surgery in the operative time, early and late complications. All patients achieved significant improvement after both laser and conventional endoforehead surgery in the final outcome. However, the early and late complications indicated a greater difference in the laser group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-95
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 17 2018

Fingerprint

Lasers
Ecchymosis
Gas Lasers
Paresthesia
Endoscopes
Alopecia
Laser Therapy
Operative Time
Hematoma
Cicatrix
Retrospective Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Safety
Muscles

Keywords

  • CO laser
  • Endoforehead lifting
  • FIBERLASE

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dermatology

Cite this

Comparing the effectiveness of laser vs. conventional endoforehead lifting. / Chang, Cheng Jen; Yu, De Yi; Chang, Shu Ying; Hsiao, Yen Chang.

In: Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, Vol. 20, No. 2, 17.02.2018, p. 91-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chang, Cheng Jen ; Yu, De Yi ; Chang, Shu Ying ; Hsiao, Yen Chang. / Comparing the effectiveness of laser vs. conventional endoforehead lifting. In: Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy. 2018 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 91-95.
@article{9e6d6f6639eb43b883be62096cec73e5,
title = "Comparing the effectiveness of laser vs. conventional endoforehead lifting",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of laser versus conventional endoforehead lifting. Over a period of 12 years (January 2000–January 2012), a total of 110 patients with hyperactive muscles over the frontal region have been collected for a retrospective study. The SurgiLase 150XJ CO2 laser system, in conjunction with the flexible FIBERLASE, was used. The endoscope was 4 mm in diameter with an angle of 30°. The primary efficacy measurement was the assessment of the final outcome for using laser vs. conventional methods. Both groups were observed at three weeks, six weeks and six months after surgery. The most common complication in early convalescence (three weeks) was swelling. This was followed by local paraesthesia, ecchymosis, localized hematomas and scar with alopecia. All these problems disappeared completely after the 6-month study period. Based on a chi-square analysis, there were clinically and statistically significant differences favouring the laser endoforehead surgery in the operative time, early and late complications. All patients achieved significant improvement after both laser and conventional endoforehead surgery in the final outcome. However, the early and late complications indicated a greater difference in the laser group.",
keywords = "CO laser, Endoforehead lifting, FIBERLASE",
author = "Chang, {Cheng Jen} and Yu, {De Yi} and Chang, {Shu Ying} and Hsiao, {Yen Chang}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/14764172.2016.1256487",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "91--95",
journal = "Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy",
issn = "1476-4172",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the effectiveness of laser vs. conventional endoforehead lifting

AU - Chang, Cheng Jen

AU - Yu, De Yi

AU - Chang, Shu Ying

AU - Hsiao, Yen Chang

PY - 2018/2/17

Y1 - 2018/2/17

N2 - The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of laser versus conventional endoforehead lifting. Over a period of 12 years (January 2000–January 2012), a total of 110 patients with hyperactive muscles over the frontal region have been collected for a retrospective study. The SurgiLase 150XJ CO2 laser system, in conjunction with the flexible FIBERLASE, was used. The endoscope was 4 mm in diameter with an angle of 30°. The primary efficacy measurement was the assessment of the final outcome for using laser vs. conventional methods. Both groups were observed at three weeks, six weeks and six months after surgery. The most common complication in early convalescence (three weeks) was swelling. This was followed by local paraesthesia, ecchymosis, localized hematomas and scar with alopecia. All these problems disappeared completely after the 6-month study period. Based on a chi-square analysis, there were clinically and statistically significant differences favouring the laser endoforehead surgery in the operative time, early and late complications. All patients achieved significant improvement after both laser and conventional endoforehead surgery in the final outcome. However, the early and late complications indicated a greater difference in the laser group.

AB - The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of laser versus conventional endoforehead lifting. Over a period of 12 years (January 2000–January 2012), a total of 110 patients with hyperactive muscles over the frontal region have been collected for a retrospective study. The SurgiLase 150XJ CO2 laser system, in conjunction with the flexible FIBERLASE, was used. The endoscope was 4 mm in diameter with an angle of 30°. The primary efficacy measurement was the assessment of the final outcome for using laser vs. conventional methods. Both groups were observed at three weeks, six weeks and six months after surgery. The most common complication in early convalescence (three weeks) was swelling. This was followed by local paraesthesia, ecchymosis, localized hematomas and scar with alopecia. All these problems disappeared completely after the 6-month study period. Based on a chi-square analysis, there were clinically and statistically significant differences favouring the laser endoforehead surgery in the operative time, early and late complications. All patients achieved significant improvement after both laser and conventional endoforehead surgery in the final outcome. However, the early and late complications indicated a greater difference in the laser group.

KW - CO laser

KW - Endoforehead lifting

KW - FIBERLASE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042910221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042910221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14764172.2016.1256487

DO - 10.1080/14764172.2016.1256487

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042910221

VL - 20

SP - 91

EP - 95

JO - Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy

JF - Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy

SN - 1476-4172

IS - 2

ER -