Comparing Longitudinal Effects of an Intervention by Different Statistical Approaches

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Repeated measures ANOVA and individual regression analysis are used in longitudinal data. Data from Chang (2006) study was illustrated the similarities and differences between them. The purpose of study was to test effects of a training program. Findings from RMANOVA concluded that treatment group had better knowledge (F=56, p< 0.001) and greater intention (belief: F=4.4, p=0.03) than control group. No conclusions could be drawn regarding direction, magnitude, and timing of change. Results from IRA indicated that there were significantly different patterns of change on knowledge (t=-4.8, p< 0.001), attitude (t=1.8, p=0.07), perceived behavior control (t=1.9, p=0.06), and intention (freq.: t=-2.3, p=0.02; beliefs: t=-2.7, p=0.01) between two groups. IRA and use of both methods as complementary are suggested.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-22
Number of pages6
Journal健康管理學刊
Volume6
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Behavior Control
Analysis of Variance
Regression Analysis
Education
Control Groups
Therapeutics
Direction compound

Keywords

  • 縱貫性研究
  • 重複性測量變異量分析
  • 個人化回歸模式劍斤
  • Longitudinal study
  • Repeated measures ANOVA RMANOVA
  • Individual regression analysis IRA

Cite this

Comparing Longitudinal Effects of an Intervention by Different Statistical Approaches. / Chang, Chia-Chi.

In: 健康管理學刊, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2008, p. 17-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{079474a2cca54ea1b72a8267e39e9141,
title = "Comparing Longitudinal Effects of an Intervention by Different Statistical Approaches",
abstract = "Repeated measures ANOVA and individual regression analysis are used in longitudinal data. Data from Chang (2006) study was illustrated the similarities and differences between them. The purpose of study was to test effects of a training program. Findings from RMANOVA concluded that treatment group had better knowledge (F=56, p< 0.001) and greater intention (belief: F=4.4, p=0.03) than control group. No conclusions could be drawn regarding direction, magnitude, and timing of change. Results from IRA indicated that there were significantly different patterns of change on knowledge (t=-4.8, p< 0.001), attitude (t=1.8, p=0.07), perceived behavior control (t=1.9, p=0.06), and intention (freq.: t=-2.3, p=0.02; beliefs: t=-2.7, p=0.01) between two groups. IRA and use of both methods as complementary are suggested.",
keywords = "縱貫性研究, 重複性測量變異量分析, 個人化回歸模式劍斤, Longitudinal study, Repeated measures ANOVA RMANOVA, Individual regression analysis IRA",
author = "Chia-Chi Chang",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "17--22",
journal = "健康管理學刊",
issn = "1811-1947",
publisher = "臺灣健康管理學會",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing Longitudinal Effects of an Intervention by Different Statistical Approaches

AU - Chang, Chia-Chi

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Repeated measures ANOVA and individual regression analysis are used in longitudinal data. Data from Chang (2006) study was illustrated the similarities and differences between them. The purpose of study was to test effects of a training program. Findings from RMANOVA concluded that treatment group had better knowledge (F=56, p< 0.001) and greater intention (belief: F=4.4, p=0.03) than control group. No conclusions could be drawn regarding direction, magnitude, and timing of change. Results from IRA indicated that there were significantly different patterns of change on knowledge (t=-4.8, p< 0.001), attitude (t=1.8, p=0.07), perceived behavior control (t=1.9, p=0.06), and intention (freq.: t=-2.3, p=0.02; beliefs: t=-2.7, p=0.01) between two groups. IRA and use of both methods as complementary are suggested.

AB - Repeated measures ANOVA and individual regression analysis are used in longitudinal data. Data from Chang (2006) study was illustrated the similarities and differences between them. The purpose of study was to test effects of a training program. Findings from RMANOVA concluded that treatment group had better knowledge (F=56, p< 0.001) and greater intention (belief: F=4.4, p=0.03) than control group. No conclusions could be drawn regarding direction, magnitude, and timing of change. Results from IRA indicated that there were significantly different patterns of change on knowledge (t=-4.8, p< 0.001), attitude (t=1.8, p=0.07), perceived behavior control (t=1.9, p=0.06), and intention (freq.: t=-2.3, p=0.02; beliefs: t=-2.7, p=0.01) between two groups. IRA and use of both methods as complementary are suggested.

KW - 縱貫性研究

KW - 重複性測量變異量分析

KW - 個人化回歸模式劍斤

KW - Longitudinal study

KW - Repeated measures ANOVA RMANOVA

KW - Individual regression analysis IRA

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 17

EP - 22

JO - 健康管理學刊

JF - 健康管理學刊

SN - 1811-1947

IS - 1

ER -