Common brain activations for painful and non-painful aversive stimuli

Dave J. Hayes, Georg Northoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Identification of potentially harmful stimuli is necessary for the well-being and self-preservation of all organisms. However, the neural substrates involved in the processing of aversive stimuli are not well understood. For instance, painful and non-painful aversive stimuli are largely thought to activate different neural networks. However, it is presently unclear whether there is a common aversion-related network of brain regions responsible for the basic processing of aversive stimuli. To help clarify this issue, this report used a cross-species translational approach in humans (i.e. meta-analysis) and rodents (i.e. systematic review of functional neuroanatomy).Results: Animal and human data combined to show a core aversion-related network, consisting of similar cortical (i.e. MCC, PCC, AI, DMPFC, RTG, SMA, VLOFC; see results section or abbreviation section for full names) and subcortical (i.e. Amyg, BNST, DS, Hab, Hipp/Parahipp, Hyp, NAc, NTS, PAG, PBN, raphe, septal nuclei, Thal, LC, midbrain) regions. In addition, a number of regions appeared to be more involved in pain-related (e.g. sensory cortex) or non-pain-related (e.g. amygdala) aversive processing.Conclusions: This investigation suggests that aversive processing, at the most basic level, relies on similar neural substrates, and that differential responses may be due, in part, to the recruitment of additional structures as well as the spatio-temporal dynamic activity of the network. This network perspective may provide a clearer understanding of why components of this circuit appear dysfunctional in some psychiatric and pain-related disorders.

Original languageEnglish
Article number60
JournalBMC Neuroscience
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 7 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neuroanatomy
Septal Nuclei
Somatoform Disorders
Raphe Nuclei
Brain
Mesencephalon
Amygdala
Names
Psychiatry
Meta-Analysis
Rodentia
Pain

Keywords

  • Animal models
  • Aversion
  • Meta-analysis
  • Neuroimaging
  • Pain
  • Translational

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Common brain activations for painful and non-painful aversive stimuli. / Hayes, Dave J.; Northoff, Georg.

In: BMC Neuroscience, Vol. 13, No. 1, 60, 07.06.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e66522af0f804c67877b3399fab11de1,
title = "Common brain activations for painful and non-painful aversive stimuli",
abstract = "Background: Identification of potentially harmful stimuli is necessary for the well-being and self-preservation of all organisms. However, the neural substrates involved in the processing of aversive stimuli are not well understood. For instance, painful and non-painful aversive stimuli are largely thought to activate different neural networks. However, it is presently unclear whether there is a common aversion-related network of brain regions responsible for the basic processing of aversive stimuli. To help clarify this issue, this report used a cross-species translational approach in humans (i.e. meta-analysis) and rodents (i.e. systematic review of functional neuroanatomy).Results: Animal and human data combined to show a core aversion-related network, consisting of similar cortical (i.e. MCC, PCC, AI, DMPFC, RTG, SMA, VLOFC; see results section or abbreviation section for full names) and subcortical (i.e. Amyg, BNST, DS, Hab, Hipp/Parahipp, Hyp, NAc, NTS, PAG, PBN, raphe, septal nuclei, Thal, LC, midbrain) regions. In addition, a number of regions appeared to be more involved in pain-related (e.g. sensory cortex) or non-pain-related (e.g. amygdala) aversive processing.Conclusions: This investigation suggests that aversive processing, at the most basic level, relies on similar neural substrates, and that differential responses may be due, in part, to the recruitment of additional structures as well as the spatio-temporal dynamic activity of the network. This network perspective may provide a clearer understanding of why components of this circuit appear dysfunctional in some psychiatric and pain-related disorders.",
keywords = "Animal models, Aversion, Meta-analysis, Neuroimaging, Pain, Translational",
author = "Hayes, {Dave J.} and Georg Northoff",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2202-13-60",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "BMC Neuroscience",
issn = "1471-2202",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Common brain activations for painful and non-painful aversive stimuli

AU - Hayes, Dave J.

AU - Northoff, Georg

PY - 2012/6/7

Y1 - 2012/6/7

N2 - Background: Identification of potentially harmful stimuli is necessary for the well-being and self-preservation of all organisms. However, the neural substrates involved in the processing of aversive stimuli are not well understood. For instance, painful and non-painful aversive stimuli are largely thought to activate different neural networks. However, it is presently unclear whether there is a common aversion-related network of brain regions responsible for the basic processing of aversive stimuli. To help clarify this issue, this report used a cross-species translational approach in humans (i.e. meta-analysis) and rodents (i.e. systematic review of functional neuroanatomy).Results: Animal and human data combined to show a core aversion-related network, consisting of similar cortical (i.e. MCC, PCC, AI, DMPFC, RTG, SMA, VLOFC; see results section or abbreviation section for full names) and subcortical (i.e. Amyg, BNST, DS, Hab, Hipp/Parahipp, Hyp, NAc, NTS, PAG, PBN, raphe, septal nuclei, Thal, LC, midbrain) regions. In addition, a number of regions appeared to be more involved in pain-related (e.g. sensory cortex) or non-pain-related (e.g. amygdala) aversive processing.Conclusions: This investigation suggests that aversive processing, at the most basic level, relies on similar neural substrates, and that differential responses may be due, in part, to the recruitment of additional structures as well as the spatio-temporal dynamic activity of the network. This network perspective may provide a clearer understanding of why components of this circuit appear dysfunctional in some psychiatric and pain-related disorders.

AB - Background: Identification of potentially harmful stimuli is necessary for the well-being and self-preservation of all organisms. However, the neural substrates involved in the processing of aversive stimuli are not well understood. For instance, painful and non-painful aversive stimuli are largely thought to activate different neural networks. However, it is presently unclear whether there is a common aversion-related network of brain regions responsible for the basic processing of aversive stimuli. To help clarify this issue, this report used a cross-species translational approach in humans (i.e. meta-analysis) and rodents (i.e. systematic review of functional neuroanatomy).Results: Animal and human data combined to show a core aversion-related network, consisting of similar cortical (i.e. MCC, PCC, AI, DMPFC, RTG, SMA, VLOFC; see results section or abbreviation section for full names) and subcortical (i.e. Amyg, BNST, DS, Hab, Hipp/Parahipp, Hyp, NAc, NTS, PAG, PBN, raphe, septal nuclei, Thal, LC, midbrain) regions. In addition, a number of regions appeared to be more involved in pain-related (e.g. sensory cortex) or non-pain-related (e.g. amygdala) aversive processing.Conclusions: This investigation suggests that aversive processing, at the most basic level, relies on similar neural substrates, and that differential responses may be due, in part, to the recruitment of additional structures as well as the spatio-temporal dynamic activity of the network. This network perspective may provide a clearer understanding of why components of this circuit appear dysfunctional in some psychiatric and pain-related disorders.

KW - Animal models

KW - Aversion

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Neuroimaging

KW - Pain

KW - Translational

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861845296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861845296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2202-13-60

DO - 10.1186/1471-2202-13-60

M3 - Article

C2 - 22676259

AN - SCOPUS:84861845296

VL - 13

JO - BMC Neuroscience

JF - BMC Neuroscience

SN - 1471-2202

IS - 1

M1 - 60

ER -