Clinical outcome of severe head injury using three different ICP and CPP protocol-driven therapies

Sheng Jean Huang, Wei Chen Hong, Yin Yi Han, Yuan Sen Chen, Chung Shi Wen, Yi Shin Tsai, Yong Kwang Tu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the past 5 years, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) management has become the standard in the treatment of severe head injuries. Guidelines published in 2000 suggest that CPP should be at least 70 mmHg; however, there is still debate about the optimal CPP. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of these three widely used therapies: (i) intracranial pressure (ICP) targeted; (ii) CPP-targeted with CPP >70 mmHg; and (iii) modified CPP-targeted (mCPP) therapy with CPP >60 mmHg. The clinical procedures, complications and outcomes of patients in the different groups were compared. Data, including patient age, sex, initial Glasgow Coma Scale, ICP, CPP, fluid status, amount of mannitol and vasopressor used, daily fluid intake and output, complications and clinical results, were collected from 213 patients with severe head injuries over a 12-year period. Patients were categorized into three groups (ICP, CPP, mCPP) according to the treatment protocol used. Retrospective data collection was performed by chart review. The mortality rate was 28.6%, 14.3% and 13.5% in the ICP, CPP, and mCPP groups, respectively. Highest intake/output ratio, amount of vasopressor used and pulmonary complications were seen in the CPP patients. The mCPP patients showed the best clinical outcome and lowest complication rate. Although CPP-targeted therapy is the most recommended therapeutic protocol, our data show that patients treated with modified CPP-target therapy with CPP >60 mmHg have better clinical outcomes and fewer complications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)818-822
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Neuroscience
Volume13
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cerebrovascular Circulation
Intracranial Pressure
Craniocerebral Trauma
Therapeutics
Glasgow Coma Scale

Keywords

  • Cerebral perfusion pressure
  • Intracranial hypertension
  • Protocol-driven therapy
  • Severe head injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Clinical outcome of severe head injury using three different ICP and CPP protocol-driven therapies. / Huang, Sheng Jean; Hong, Wei Chen; Han, Yin Yi; Chen, Yuan Sen; Wen, Chung Shi; Tsai, Yi Shin; Tu, Yong Kwang.

In: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 13, No. 8, 01.10.2006, p. 818-822.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huang, Sheng Jean ; Hong, Wei Chen ; Han, Yin Yi ; Chen, Yuan Sen ; Wen, Chung Shi ; Tsai, Yi Shin ; Tu, Yong Kwang. / Clinical outcome of severe head injury using three different ICP and CPP protocol-driven therapies. In: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2006 ; Vol. 13, No. 8. pp. 818-822.
@article{61fdbbd2b104473ab2ef156c4fba1f7c,
title = "Clinical outcome of severe head injury using three different ICP and CPP protocol-driven therapies",
abstract = "In the past 5 years, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) management has become the standard in the treatment of severe head injuries. Guidelines published in 2000 suggest that CPP should be at least 70 mmHg; however, there is still debate about the optimal CPP. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of these three widely used therapies: (i) intracranial pressure (ICP) targeted; (ii) CPP-targeted with CPP >70 mmHg; and (iii) modified CPP-targeted (mCPP) therapy with CPP >60 mmHg. The clinical procedures, complications and outcomes of patients in the different groups were compared. Data, including patient age, sex, initial Glasgow Coma Scale, ICP, CPP, fluid status, amount of mannitol and vasopressor used, daily fluid intake and output, complications and clinical results, were collected from 213 patients with severe head injuries over a 12-year period. Patients were categorized into three groups (ICP, CPP, mCPP) according to the treatment protocol used. Retrospective data collection was performed by chart review. The mortality rate was 28.6{\%}, 14.3{\%} and 13.5{\%} in the ICP, CPP, and mCPP groups, respectively. Highest intake/output ratio, amount of vasopressor used and pulmonary complications were seen in the CPP patients. The mCPP patients showed the best clinical outcome and lowest complication rate. Although CPP-targeted therapy is the most recommended therapeutic protocol, our data show that patients treated with modified CPP-target therapy with CPP >60 mmHg have better clinical outcomes and fewer complications.",
keywords = "Cerebral perfusion pressure, Intracranial hypertension, Protocol-driven therapy, Severe head injury",
author = "Huang, {Sheng Jean} and Hong, {Wei Chen} and Han, {Yin Yi} and Chen, {Yuan Sen} and Wen, {Chung Shi} and Tsai, {Yi Shin} and Tu, {Yong Kwang}",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jocn.2005.11.034",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "818--822",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Neuroscience",
issn = "0967-5868",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical outcome of severe head injury using three different ICP and CPP protocol-driven therapies

AU - Huang, Sheng Jean

AU - Hong, Wei Chen

AU - Han, Yin Yi

AU - Chen, Yuan Sen

AU - Wen, Chung Shi

AU - Tsai, Yi Shin

AU - Tu, Yong Kwang

PY - 2006/10/1

Y1 - 2006/10/1

N2 - In the past 5 years, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) management has become the standard in the treatment of severe head injuries. Guidelines published in 2000 suggest that CPP should be at least 70 mmHg; however, there is still debate about the optimal CPP. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of these three widely used therapies: (i) intracranial pressure (ICP) targeted; (ii) CPP-targeted with CPP >70 mmHg; and (iii) modified CPP-targeted (mCPP) therapy with CPP >60 mmHg. The clinical procedures, complications and outcomes of patients in the different groups were compared. Data, including patient age, sex, initial Glasgow Coma Scale, ICP, CPP, fluid status, amount of mannitol and vasopressor used, daily fluid intake and output, complications and clinical results, were collected from 213 patients with severe head injuries over a 12-year period. Patients were categorized into three groups (ICP, CPP, mCPP) according to the treatment protocol used. Retrospective data collection was performed by chart review. The mortality rate was 28.6%, 14.3% and 13.5% in the ICP, CPP, and mCPP groups, respectively. Highest intake/output ratio, amount of vasopressor used and pulmonary complications were seen in the CPP patients. The mCPP patients showed the best clinical outcome and lowest complication rate. Although CPP-targeted therapy is the most recommended therapeutic protocol, our data show that patients treated with modified CPP-target therapy with CPP >60 mmHg have better clinical outcomes and fewer complications.

AB - In the past 5 years, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) management has become the standard in the treatment of severe head injuries. Guidelines published in 2000 suggest that CPP should be at least 70 mmHg; however, there is still debate about the optimal CPP. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of these three widely used therapies: (i) intracranial pressure (ICP) targeted; (ii) CPP-targeted with CPP >70 mmHg; and (iii) modified CPP-targeted (mCPP) therapy with CPP >60 mmHg. The clinical procedures, complications and outcomes of patients in the different groups were compared. Data, including patient age, sex, initial Glasgow Coma Scale, ICP, CPP, fluid status, amount of mannitol and vasopressor used, daily fluid intake and output, complications and clinical results, were collected from 213 patients with severe head injuries over a 12-year period. Patients were categorized into three groups (ICP, CPP, mCPP) according to the treatment protocol used. Retrospective data collection was performed by chart review. The mortality rate was 28.6%, 14.3% and 13.5% in the ICP, CPP, and mCPP groups, respectively. Highest intake/output ratio, amount of vasopressor used and pulmonary complications were seen in the CPP patients. The mCPP patients showed the best clinical outcome and lowest complication rate. Although CPP-targeted therapy is the most recommended therapeutic protocol, our data show that patients treated with modified CPP-target therapy with CPP >60 mmHg have better clinical outcomes and fewer complications.

KW - Cerebral perfusion pressure

KW - Intracranial hypertension

KW - Protocol-driven therapy

KW - Severe head injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748803953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748803953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.11.034

DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.11.034

M3 - Article

C2 - 16908157

AN - SCOPUS:33748803953

VL - 13

SP - 818

EP - 822

JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

SN - 0967-5868

IS - 8

ER -