Choosing the ideal length of a double-pigtail ureteral stent according to body height: Study based on a chinese population

Chen Hsun Ho, Kuo How Huang, Shyh Chyan Chen, Yeong Shiau Pu, Shih Ping Liu, Hong Jeng Yu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We conducted this study to determine the ideal stent length according to body height, as data are limited. Patients and Methods: A total of 408 patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy and stent insertion (22, 24 or 26 cm) were enrolled. The appropriateness of the stent length was determined according to the plain films and was further compared among patients with different body heights and stent lengths. Results: In patients <160 cm, the use of a 22-cm stent was significantly more appropriate than a 24- or 26-cm stent (86.5, 51.9 and 46.4%). In patients between 160 and 175 cm, a 22- or 24-cm stent was significantly more appropriate than a 26-cm stent (79.2, 66.7 and 46.3%), while the difference between the use of a 22- and 24-cm stent was not significant. In patients >175 cm, a 24- or 26-cm stent might be more appropriate. Conclusions: Body heights can predict the ideal stent length. Based on a Chinese population, a 22-cm stent length is more appropriate for those <175 cm. A longer, 24- or 26-cm stent may be suitable for those >175 cm.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-74
Number of pages5
JournalUrologia Internationalis
Volume83
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Body Height
Stents
Population
Lithotripsy
Motion Pictures

Keywords

  • Double-pigtail ureteral stent
  • Stent length
  • Ureteral obstruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Choosing the ideal length of a double-pigtail ureteral stent according to body height : Study based on a chinese population. / Ho, Chen Hsun; Huang, Kuo How; Chen, Shyh Chyan; Pu, Yeong Shiau; Liu, Shih Ping; Yu, Hong Jeng.

In: Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 83, No. 1, 01.07.2009, p. 70-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ho, Chen Hsun ; Huang, Kuo How ; Chen, Shyh Chyan ; Pu, Yeong Shiau ; Liu, Shih Ping ; Yu, Hong Jeng. / Choosing the ideal length of a double-pigtail ureteral stent according to body height : Study based on a chinese population. In: Urologia Internationalis. 2009 ; Vol. 83, No. 1. pp. 70-74.
@article{f21aed065bef4601abbc100325521d5e,
title = "Choosing the ideal length of a double-pigtail ureteral stent according to body height: Study based on a chinese population",
abstract = "Objective: We conducted this study to determine the ideal stent length according to body height, as data are limited. Patients and Methods: A total of 408 patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy and stent insertion (22, 24 or 26 cm) were enrolled. The appropriateness of the stent length was determined according to the plain films and was further compared among patients with different body heights and stent lengths. Results: In patients <160 cm, the use of a 22-cm stent was significantly more appropriate than a 24- or 26-cm stent (86.5, 51.9 and 46.4{\%}). In patients between 160 and 175 cm, a 22- or 24-cm stent was significantly more appropriate than a 26-cm stent (79.2, 66.7 and 46.3{\%}), while the difference between the use of a 22- and 24-cm stent was not significant. In patients >175 cm, a 24- or 26-cm stent might be more appropriate. Conclusions: Body heights can predict the ideal stent length. Based on a Chinese population, a 22-cm stent length is more appropriate for those <175 cm. A longer, 24- or 26-cm stent may be suitable for those >175 cm.",
keywords = "Double-pigtail ureteral stent, Stent length, Ureteral obstruction",
author = "Ho, {Chen Hsun} and Huang, {Kuo How} and Chen, {Shyh Chyan} and Pu, {Yeong Shiau} and Liu, {Shih Ping} and Yu, {Hong Jeng}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1159/000224872",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "70--74",
journal = "Urologia Internationalis",
issn = "0042-1138",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choosing the ideal length of a double-pigtail ureteral stent according to body height

T2 - Study based on a chinese population

AU - Ho, Chen Hsun

AU - Huang, Kuo How

AU - Chen, Shyh Chyan

AU - Pu, Yeong Shiau

AU - Liu, Shih Ping

AU - Yu, Hong Jeng

PY - 2009/7/1

Y1 - 2009/7/1

N2 - Objective: We conducted this study to determine the ideal stent length according to body height, as data are limited. Patients and Methods: A total of 408 patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy and stent insertion (22, 24 or 26 cm) were enrolled. The appropriateness of the stent length was determined according to the plain films and was further compared among patients with different body heights and stent lengths. Results: In patients <160 cm, the use of a 22-cm stent was significantly more appropriate than a 24- or 26-cm stent (86.5, 51.9 and 46.4%). In patients between 160 and 175 cm, a 22- or 24-cm stent was significantly more appropriate than a 26-cm stent (79.2, 66.7 and 46.3%), while the difference between the use of a 22- and 24-cm stent was not significant. In patients >175 cm, a 24- or 26-cm stent might be more appropriate. Conclusions: Body heights can predict the ideal stent length. Based on a Chinese population, a 22-cm stent length is more appropriate for those <175 cm. A longer, 24- or 26-cm stent may be suitable for those >175 cm.

AB - Objective: We conducted this study to determine the ideal stent length according to body height, as data are limited. Patients and Methods: A total of 408 patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy and stent insertion (22, 24 or 26 cm) were enrolled. The appropriateness of the stent length was determined according to the plain films and was further compared among patients with different body heights and stent lengths. Results: In patients <160 cm, the use of a 22-cm stent was significantly more appropriate than a 24- or 26-cm stent (86.5, 51.9 and 46.4%). In patients between 160 and 175 cm, a 22- or 24-cm stent was significantly more appropriate than a 26-cm stent (79.2, 66.7 and 46.3%), while the difference between the use of a 22- and 24-cm stent was not significant. In patients >175 cm, a 24- or 26-cm stent might be more appropriate. Conclusions: Body heights can predict the ideal stent length. Based on a Chinese population, a 22-cm stent length is more appropriate for those <175 cm. A longer, 24- or 26-cm stent may be suitable for those >175 cm.

KW - Double-pigtail ureteral stent

KW - Stent length

KW - Ureteral obstruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68549118963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68549118963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000224872

DO - 10.1159/000224872

M3 - Article

C2 - 19641363

AN - SCOPUS:68549118963

VL - 83

SP - 70

EP - 74

JO - Urologia Internationalis

JF - Urologia Internationalis

SN - 0042-1138

IS - 1

ER -