Can knowledge of election results change recall of our predictions? Neural correlates of political hindsight bias

Yin Hua Chen, Hsu Po Cheng, Yu Wen Lu, Pei Hong Lee, Georg Northoff, Nai Shing Yen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Hindsight bias (HB) is the tendency to retrospectively exaggerate one’s foresight knowledge about the outcome of an event. Cognitive processes influenced by newly obtained outcome information are used to explain the HB phenomenon, but the neural correlates remain unknown. This study investigated HB in the context of election results using a memory design and functional magnetic resonance imaging for the first time. Participants were asked to predict and recall the percentage of votes obtained by (pairs of) candidates before and after an election. The results revealed that 88% of participants showed HB by recalling that their predictions were closer to the actual outcomes than they really were; and participants had HB for 38% of the events. The HB effect was associated with activation in the medial superior frontal gyrus and bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), which have been implicated in updating an old belief due to new information and is similar to the process of reconstruction bias. Furthermore, participants with a greater HB effect showed greater activation of the left IFG. In conclusion, we successfully observed the HB phenomenon in election results, and our imaging results suggested that the HB phenomenon might involve reconstruction bias.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0220690
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume14
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Prefrontal Cortex
Chemical activation
prediction
Imaging techniques
Data storage equipment
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
magnetic resonance imaging
cognition
image analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • General

Cite this

Can knowledge of election results change recall of our predictions? Neural correlates of political hindsight bias. / Chen, Yin Hua; Cheng, Hsu Po; Lu, Yu Wen; Lee, Pei Hong; Northoff, Georg; Yen, Nai Shing.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 10, e0220690, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8129ad413bb54fc1aa85646c2f1b1f02,
title = "Can knowledge of election results change recall of our predictions? Neural correlates of political hindsight bias",
abstract = "Hindsight bias (HB) is the tendency to retrospectively exaggerate one’s foresight knowledge about the outcome of an event. Cognitive processes influenced by newly obtained outcome information are used to explain the HB phenomenon, but the neural correlates remain unknown. This study investigated HB in the context of election results using a memory design and functional magnetic resonance imaging for the first time. Participants were asked to predict and recall the percentage of votes obtained by (pairs of) candidates before and after an election. The results revealed that 88{\%} of participants showed HB by recalling that their predictions were closer to the actual outcomes than they really were; and participants had HB for 38{\%} of the events. The HB effect was associated with activation in the medial superior frontal gyrus and bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), which have been implicated in updating an old belief due to new information and is similar to the process of reconstruction bias. Furthermore, participants with a greater HB effect showed greater activation of the left IFG. In conclusion, we successfully observed the HB phenomenon in election results, and our imaging results suggested that the HB phenomenon might involve reconstruction bias.",
author = "Chen, {Yin Hua} and Cheng, {Hsu Po} and Lu, {Yu Wen} and Lee, {Pei Hong} and Georg Northoff and Yen, {Nai Shing}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0220690",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can knowledge of election results change recall of our predictions? Neural correlates of political hindsight bias

AU - Chen, Yin Hua

AU - Cheng, Hsu Po

AU - Lu, Yu Wen

AU - Lee, Pei Hong

AU - Northoff, Georg

AU - Yen, Nai Shing

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Hindsight bias (HB) is the tendency to retrospectively exaggerate one’s foresight knowledge about the outcome of an event. Cognitive processes influenced by newly obtained outcome information are used to explain the HB phenomenon, but the neural correlates remain unknown. This study investigated HB in the context of election results using a memory design and functional magnetic resonance imaging for the first time. Participants were asked to predict and recall the percentage of votes obtained by (pairs of) candidates before and after an election. The results revealed that 88% of participants showed HB by recalling that their predictions were closer to the actual outcomes than they really were; and participants had HB for 38% of the events. The HB effect was associated with activation in the medial superior frontal gyrus and bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), which have been implicated in updating an old belief due to new information and is similar to the process of reconstruction bias. Furthermore, participants with a greater HB effect showed greater activation of the left IFG. In conclusion, we successfully observed the HB phenomenon in election results, and our imaging results suggested that the HB phenomenon might involve reconstruction bias.

AB - Hindsight bias (HB) is the tendency to retrospectively exaggerate one’s foresight knowledge about the outcome of an event. Cognitive processes influenced by newly obtained outcome information are used to explain the HB phenomenon, but the neural correlates remain unknown. This study investigated HB in the context of election results using a memory design and functional magnetic resonance imaging for the first time. Participants were asked to predict and recall the percentage of votes obtained by (pairs of) candidates before and after an election. The results revealed that 88% of participants showed HB by recalling that their predictions were closer to the actual outcomes than they really were; and participants had HB for 38% of the events. The HB effect was associated with activation in the medial superior frontal gyrus and bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), which have been implicated in updating an old belief due to new information and is similar to the process of reconstruction bias. Furthermore, participants with a greater HB effect showed greater activation of the left IFG. In conclusion, we successfully observed the HB phenomenon in election results, and our imaging results suggested that the HB phenomenon might involve reconstruction bias.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073123160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073123160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0220690

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0220690

M3 - Article

C2 - 31600216

AN - SCOPUS:85073123160

VL - 14

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 10

M1 - e0220690

ER -